User talk:Itsfaizanfaizi

Welcome!

Hello, Itsfaizanfaizi, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Wireless router, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorials
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! HaeB (talk) 09:40, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... How can I add the image to an article? Itsfaizanfaizi (talk) 07:06, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at this article: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Help:Pictures

Replace the help me template if you still have questions. Geode (talk) 07:15, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images are not considered during the draft review process, so first work on getting your draft approved. David notMD (talk) 15:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Itsfaizanfaizi/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:09, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Itsfaizanfaizi! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:09, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, I'm Obi2canibe. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the main body of Private school (Sri Lanka). Generally, any relevant external links should be listed in an "External links" section at the end of the article and meet the external links guidelines. Links within the body of an article should be internal wikilinks. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Obi2canibe (talk) 16:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, @Obi2canibe. Thank you for letting me know about the changes you made. I appreciate your efforts in maintaining Wikipedia’s guidelines. I understand the importance of keeping external links in the appropriate section and will ensure to follow the external links guidelines in the future.

If the removed link(s) contained valuable information that could benefit readers, would it be possible to consider including them in the "External links" section? Please let me know if there’s a better way to contribute such resources.

Thank you for your time. @Itsfaizanfaizi Itsfaizanfaizi (talk) 10:29, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if the link you tried to add was relevant to the article, you can add an external link section.--Obi2canibe (talk) 18:27, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Ethernet. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Zac67 (talk) 10:09, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Itsfaizanfaizi. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Itsfaizanfaizi. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Itsfaizanfaizi|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 10:41, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hafeez Center (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I am taking the unusual step of a second review. This was, is, and remains an advert. I am loath to give it one more chance to be edited correctly but I will.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hafeez Center and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:26, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a blatant advert. I almost decided to reject it and send it for deletion as an advert. I have given you a further chance to edit it. This time please do the work. Lose promotional words: leading, massive, numerous, prominence, prominent, significant, spanning. Rephrase anything that looks like a paean of praise. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:30, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I addressed the peacock prose by removing or rephrasing exaggerated terms and subjective descriptions. Itsfaizanfaizi (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hafeez Center (December 27)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Still advertising, and still no indication of notability.

bonadea contributions talk 20:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Itsfaizanfaizi! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Submission declined, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:15, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]