User talk:Italian style/Enter your new article name here

Why is this not ready for mainspace? Italian style (talk) 15:32, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Article not ready for the mainspace ~~ GB fan ~~ 15:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Italian style/Enter your new article name here → Lubiam Moda per l'Uomo Spa

Move to main page to launch. User:Italian style 20:23, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as spam? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:51, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Do not move until the article has been properly referenced, so that its notability can be established. Mjroots (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 2

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. While some references have been added, the notability is not established. Also this sounds like a copy vio from somewhere and with that concern, I don't think it belongs in the main name space. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Italian style/Enter your new article name here → Lubiam Moda per l'Uomo Spa — Launch to main page Italian style (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have you looked at Wikipedia's notability requirements? From the article and its references, no notability is established. If you can update the article (and back it up with sources) to reflect any notability it may have, it will be ready. But for now, it looks more like an advertisement. [flaming lawyer] 22:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move

User:Italian style/Enter your new article name here → Lubiam Moda per l'Uomo Spa — Move page to launch. 96.224.9.26 (talk) 16:26, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose - at the moment this reads like an advertisement masquerading as an article. If you tone down the hyperbole and excise the marketing speak and puffery, it may have a chance. – ukexpat (talk) 21:49, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved as there is no consensus this is ready for article space. In future instead of creating a requested move for a move from userspace please follow the instructions at WP:Requested moves#Processes beyond the scope of this page and add {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article instead. Dpmuk (talk) 12:24, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:Italian style/Enter your new article name here → Lubiam Moda per I'Uomo Spa — Move page to launch

Strong oppose - at the moment this reads like an advertisement masquerading as an article. If you tone down the hyperbole and excise the marketing speak and puffery, it may have a chance. Fix this issue rather than keep requesting a page move because if it is moved in this form it will be speedily deleted as spam. – ukexpat (talk) 21:20, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I took out all of the "marketing speak" and the page reads more like a history. I do not understand why it is still getting rejected. Please advise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.224.9.26 (talk) 14:41, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.