User talk:Ishbiliyya

Hello, Ishbiliyya, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Rasnaboy (talk) 01:51, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Jewish critics of Islam has been nominated for discussion

Category:Jewish critics of Islam, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 09:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

undiscussed mergers

Please stop merging articles without discussion, if you have a valid case you will succeed.Slatersteven (talk) 14:59, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

.Slatersteven (talk) 14:59, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Icewhiz (talk) 03:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC) [reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Icewhiz (talk) 03:56, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits at Talk:Tulsi Gabbard

Could you tone it down a bit, please? You can get your point across without hyperbole. I've mentioned your recent talk page contribution at ANI (here). SashiRolls ^{t · c} 00:06, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So did I regarding Ishbiliyya's casting aspersion against me. --Mhhossein ^talk 12:44, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jess Phillips

I've reverted your tendentious edits to Jess Phillips, see my edit summary.[1] If you don't respect the sources, you may be topic banned from biographical articles. Bishonen | talk 20:50, 3 June 2019 (UTC).[reply]

And I have reverted the your changes again. You are adding content that is meant to convey a specific WP:POV through insinuation that is not directly supported by the accompanying source. The content is disputed and the burden is on you to get consensus on the talk page to include your additions.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:56, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A review of your edits show a complete disregard for our policies regarding living persons. Your purpose in editing appears to be to throw as much muck about as possible to see what you can get to stick. As you have already been provided with a Discretionary Sanctions alert regarding biographies in a section of your talk page above, plus the warning from Bishonen here, I would say this is your last chance to study this page to avoid a topic ban.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:04, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bishonen, User:Ponyo, I came here to drop a BLP DS warning, but I see it's already here. Please note that I just revdeleted what I consider to be serious BLP violations on Talk:Ash Sarkar. Drmies (talk) 23:12, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You should be indefinitely blocked right now IMO

I notice the 'side of the white teachers', and the 'white administration of the school', wording which you introduced inJess Phillips and invented out of whole cloth[2] — has now been further bulked up by you into "the liberal white supremacist side of the dispute" (my bolding) in your post at Talk:Jess Phillips. Note that even the word "white" is not present in either of the sources, and it's hardly from the point of view of common sense likely that these teachers and administration are predominantly white, in the highly ethnically diverse Birmingham. You're simply making up stuff that suits your agenda. If I hadn't involved myself by reverting you, I would be indefinitely blocking you right about now for the disgraceful BLP-violating white supremacist side and your racist insinuations. Ponyo is involved too. But I believe there are uninvolved admins both posting here, and watching, on this page and Talk:Jess Phillips. I hope they're reading carefully. Bishonen | talk 00:18, 4 June 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Ishiliyya, apparently I didn't really notice that "supremacist" bit when I made my comment. I suppose you should consider this a final warning of sorts, though it may be that other admins disagree, and think that you've gone too far already. Drmies (talk) 00:37, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 10:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jewish critics of Islam

A tag has been placed on Category:Jewish critics of Islam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:36, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Buddhist critics of Islam

A tag has been placed on Category:Buddhist critics of Islam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:25, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Secular critics of Islam has been nominated for discussion

Category:Secular critics of Islam, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]