Jump to content

User talk:IrisSpine

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Call of the Void has been accepted

[edit]
The Call of the Void, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 16:52, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds great!! Thank you for your time and help! :) IrisSpine (talk) 19:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm FormalDude. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Call of the Void, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ––FormalDude talk 18:51, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FormalDude! Thank you for looking into this page! I think the cast list was right. But the source was wrong. Is there a way for me to link the creator's website instead? https://www.acornartsandentertainment.com/cotv-cast IrisSpine (talk) 02:46, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you can add that link as a citation. ––FormalDude talk 05:39, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Alan Herman (March 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 21:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi S0091!
Thank you for the help on this article! I appreciate how fast and professional you were in helping me. As I provide more evidence (non-primary sources) would you like me to replace the old sources? Or just leave them there? Thank you again for your time and help! IrisSpine (talk) 01:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, IrisSpine! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 21:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Alan Herman (March 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 02:26, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Alan Herman (March 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 02:59, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Alan Herman (March 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 15:06, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Alan Herman has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Alan Herman. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 16:12, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @S0091! Thank you so much for the feedback and help here. It is seriously so helpful. I read through the notability page again, and I still think that Michael qualifies. Under the creative professionals section, is says a person is likely to be notable if they created a significant work. Michael was the co-creator of the Webby-honored fiction podcast The Call of the Void. The Webby Awards are some of the largest awards on the Internet. I tried to link some articles that proved Michael was a creator on this caliber, but I must still be doing something wrong. IrisSpine (talk) 22:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, IrisSpine. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

First let me apologize for missing the fact an article about the podcast already exists. I got caught up looking at the sources so certainly an oversight. As for COI, please read through the material above. If you do have a COI, you need to make the declaration. Having a COI does not preclude for from working on/submitting a draft so feel free to carry on but other rules apply to articles. S0091 (talk) 16:41, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Alan Herman (April 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Michael Alan Herman has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Michael Alan Herman. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:25, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your help! I appreciate your time and input. :) IrisSpine (talk) 16:50, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Alan Herman (April 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 15:39, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Greenman!
I hope you are having a great day. I would love to respond to the WP:COI query, but I am not sure how to do that. Haha. Could you point me in the right direction? IrisSpine (talk) 17:34, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Alan Herman (June 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Carpimaps was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Carpimaps talk to me! 13:04, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Michael Alan Herman

[edit]

Information icon Hello, IrisSpine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Michael Alan Herman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

[edit]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

  • Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
  • State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
  • Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.
signed, Rosguill talk 19:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]