User talk:InverseWeiner

October 2020

Hello, I'm Gladamas. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Blunt, South Dakota—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 22:26, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

@Gladamas: sorry

Speedy deletion of Ben Kleis Jr

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Ben Kleis Jr, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 00:46, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Your username brightened my day. InedibleHulk (talk) 11:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to September 11 attacks. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 01:23, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at September 11 attacks, you may be blocked from editing. David J Johnson (talk) 10:58, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the September 11 attacks. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:37, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]