User talk:InterstellarGamer12321/Archive 8
This is an archive of past discussions with User:InterstellarGamer12321. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 |
Japan electoral district articles
I noticed you added a lot of them to the Category:Districts of Japan tree. While the terms are the same in English, they are completely different things, especially with the Japanese terms (electoral district: 選挙区; district of Japan: 郡). So please refrain from adding them to the category tree in the future. ミラP@Miraclepine 00:45, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Miraclepine: apologies for adding the wrong categories, and I will not add them to these categories in the future. Because there are so many of these electoral districts, is it worth creating category trees at Category:Electoral districts in Japan or Category:Constituencies in Japan? InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 10:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Well, Category:Parliamentary districts of the Diet of Japan already has all the electoral district pages, but since there might be room for Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly et al districts, maybe in the future. I think the former wording is fine at least. ミラP@Miraclepine 17:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- After looking at other similar trees, I think "Electoral districts in [Prefecture]" might be more reasonable since all the prefectures are very unlikely to have more than two House of Councillors districts (and one in almost all cases) and there's some need to diffuse from the "Politics in [Prefecture]" categories and also accomodate prefectural assembly districts and have a less complex category tree. ミラP@Miraclepine 21:35, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Well, Category:Parliamentary districts of the Diet of Japan already has all the electoral district pages, but since there might be room for Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly et al districts, maybe in the future. I think the former wording is fine at least. ミラP@Miraclepine 17:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thanks for your work at AfC! <3
QuantumRealm (meow • pawtrack) 11:18, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter
Hello, and welcome to the December 2023 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since September. Don't forget that you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election news: The Guild needs coordinators! If you'd like to help out, you may nominate yourself or any suitable editor—with their permission—for the Election of Coordinators for the first half of 2024. Nominations will close at 23:59 on 15 December (UTC). Voting begins immediately after the close of nominations and closes at 23:59 on 31 December. All editors in good standing (not under current sanctions) are eligible, and self-nominations are welcome. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term that ends at 23:59 on 30 June. Drive: Of the 69 editors who signed up for the September Backlog Elimination Drive, 40 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 661,214 words in 290 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here. Blitz: Of the 22 editors who signed up for the October Copy Editing Blitz, 13 copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 109,327 words in 52 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here. Drive: During the November Backlog Elimination Drive, 38 of the 58 editors who signed up copy-edited at least one article. Between them, they copy-edited 458,620 words in 234 articles. Barnstars awarded are listed here. Blitz: Our December Copy Editing Blitz will run from 10 to 16 December. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 20:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 344 requests since 1 January, and the backlog stands at 2,191 articles. Other news: Our Annual Report for 2023 is planned for release in the new year. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Zippybonzo. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Message sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
New pages patrol January 2024 Backlog drive
New Page Patrol | January 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Thank you for participating in AfC November 2023 Backlog Drive
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your participation in the Articles for Creation's November 2023 Backlog Drive! You made a total of 63 reviews, for a total of 139 points. – robertsky (talk) 06:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC) |
Happy holidays!
– robertsky (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
– robertsky (talk) 06:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, InterstellarGamer12321. Thank you for your work on Mie 2nd district. MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
the mentioned source says that a different person won in 2021
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
-MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:46, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- @MPGuy2824: thank you for leaving me a message about this problem. I did not actually create the article; I only redirected it to where the district was mentioned in List of districts of the House of Representatives of Japan. Please contact User:ギルディアス156世 who actually created the article and added the source. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 09:37, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping. Sorry, the software automatically sends it to the page creator even though in this case you just created it as a redirect. I've pinged the relevant user on the article's talk page. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:35, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Zdenko_Domancic BLP draft page
Hi InterstellarGamer12321, I've seen a comment about rejection of the Zdenko_Domancic page due to lack of references. Though there are 12 references with publicly available interviews from different countries and different publication, news and media houses. Additionally there are 4 books written about subject and a documentary short film that is listed in publications, all created and published from independent authors. Not sure what more is needed to get this article published. I've read recommendations and guidelines for BLP and reliable sources, and seemed to me that was followed. Thanks NoErr (talk) 18:28, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
- @NoErr: in a WP:BLP article sourcing requirements are also about the amount of unreferenced content in the article. The referencing requirements are much stricter for BLPs, with all statements and claims needing to be sourced, which basically means you should put one inline citation at the end of each sentence ideally. Currently, several paragraphs are completely unreferenced and inline citations should be added to them or they should be removed if they are unverifiable. The references you currently have in the article are likely enough to establish notability, but I decline on the basis of the amount of unsourced information, not the lack of notability. InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 22:48, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, InterstellarGamer12321. Thank you for your work on TOI-1136. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)