User talk:International Police Organization Academy

Welcome!

Hello, International Police Organization Academy, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:International Police Organization Academy/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:International Police Organization Academy/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:International Police Organization Academy/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:International Police Organization Academy/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, International Police Organization Academy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 16:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Secretlondon (talk) 16:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

International Police Organization Academy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Hanynino (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand that my previous edits were seen as promotional, which is against Wikipedia’s policies. I apologize for this and assure you that my future contributions will adhere to Wikipedia’s guidelines. I will focus on providing neutral, well-sourced content. I do not receive any compensation for my contributions, but if I do in the future, I will disclose it as required. I hope to contribute to articles on history and biographies. Thank you for considering my request.

Decline reason:

You forgot to address your perceived violation of WP:COI. Claiming that your previous edits "were seen as promotional" is not sufficient. Your edits were blatantly promotional, some of the most clearly promotional content I've ever seen in my entire time on Wikipedia. Nothing here convinces me you'll stay away from writing about the International Police Organization Academy and any other subjects for which you have a conflict of interest. In fact, you are indicating you will write in these subject areas. Given your edits so far, it's unlikely you'll be unblocked to do that. Yamla (talk) 20:01, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Yamla and Wikipedia Administrators,

I understand that my previous edits were promotional and violated Wikipedia’s policies, specifically WP:COI (Conflict of Interest) and WP:NPOV (Neutral Point of View). I sincerely apologize for these violations. I now realize the importance of adhering to Wikipedia’s guidelines and maintaining the integrity of its content.

To address the specific concerns:

Acknowledgment of COI: I acknowledge that my previous contributions about the International Police Organization Academy were promotional and reflected a conflict of interest. I understand that such content is not acceptable on Wikipedia.
Commitment to Neutrality: I commit to avoiding any articles where I have a conflict of interest. Instead, I will focus on editing and contributing to topics where I have no personal or professional stake, such as general history and biographies that are unrelated to any organizations or individuals I have been associated with.
Disclosure of Potential COI: If I ever contribute to a topic where I might have a potential conflict of interest in the future, I will fully disclose this on the article's talk page and refrain from making direct edits to the article itself, instead suggesting changes for the community to review.
Improved Sourcing: I will ensure all my contributions are well-sourced, using reliable and verifiable references, and written from a neutral point of view.

I am genuinely interested in contributing valuable content to Wikipedia and learning from this experience. I hope you will consider giving me another chance to participate in this community while adhering strictly to its guidelines.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Dr. ALexander Jan International Police Organization Academy (talk) 20:38, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't specified the exact nature of your conflict of interest. Now is the time to do so. Additionally, you have a contradiction. You say you commit to avoiding any article for which you have a conflict but you also say if you contribute to such an article, you'll disclose this. Both statements cannot simultaneously be true. Finally, according to zerogpt.com, your response was generated by an AI. We have no interest in AI chatbots editing Wikipedia. You need to specifically address your use of AI in the past and going forward. --Yamla (talk) 21:10, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yamla,

Thank you for raising these concerns. I'd like to address each point clearly and professionally:

Conflict of Interest (COI):

Nature of COI: I want to be transparent about my conflict of interest. I have connections with the international police organization academy, as i am the executive director / CEO of the academy.

Commitment to Avoidance: To clear up any confusion, my primary commitment is to avoid editing articles where there's a conflict of interest. However, if I ever contribute to such an article, I will ensure my COI is disclosed.

Use of AI:

Past Use of AI: I have indeed used AI tools to assist in my editing and responses. Today, many people use AI to help with various tasks, and my goal has always been to provide accurate and helpful contributions.

Going Forward

I understand the importance of transparency and will make sure my use of AI aligns with Wikipedia’s standards.

I appreciate your efforts to maintain the integrity of Wikipedia. If this response does not address your concerns and my account remains blocked, I accept that decision, and if that is good for you and you want I will remove my account. International Police Organization Academy (talk) 13:20, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]