User talk:Intelectual123

Quit removing moras age.mora was born 10-10-1962 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kaylatiger23 (talk • contribs) 01:02, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Juliemisselsalvador.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Juliemisselsalvador.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:10, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Intelectual123! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Julia Mora - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

please don't remove valid sources leaving an unsourced biography

I saw your note at Julia Mora, but reverted the changes. Let me explain why.

First, whether you created the article or not, you do not own the article, the Wikipedia policy article WP:OWN talks about this, and may explain your misconception there.

But more importantly, Julia Mora is, as far as I know, a living person, and falls directly under two additional policies.

First, there is our core ("pillar") policy of verifiability. This policy can be found at WP:V. Please read it. All material on Wikipedia should be something which can be verified through independent, reliable sources, e..g., references to newspaper articles, magazines and books.

Even more importantly, this includes our policy on the biographies of living people, which is quite clear that biographies require such references. Your continual attempts to remove the references from this article are therefore non-constructive, and may be reverted at any time, continuing to make those changes (without a better reason, see below) might even lead eventually to your account being blocked here.

Now, if there's a particular reason you'd like that particular newspaper article removed, we can talk about whether that's appropriate or not. This might be appropriate if the article isn't speaking about the subject of the article, or if it contains erroneous information that can be shown to be erroneous by other reliable sources. It might also be appropriate if the source is highly slanted.

As a final note, I realize that it is quite possible that you are, or are close to, the subject of the article. If that is the case, you should be aware that we strongly discourage (but do not prohibit) people from editing their own articles. People editing articles on themselves, people or organizations close to them are subject to our WP:COI policy, which, again, if it applies, you should read and understand.

If you have any questions, please feel free to leave a note on my talk page. I'll be glad to explain further. --joe decker ^{talk to me} 15:22, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Julia Mora. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 18:17, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Julia Mora and Erik Estrada, cover National Enquirer 2008.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Julia Mora and Erik Estrada, cover National Enquirer 2008.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 22:05, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Julia Mora, Miss El Salvador 1985.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Julia Mora, Miss El Salvador 1985.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:42, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Julia Mora

Do not add or re-add information to this article without including sources that establish what you are saying about her is correct. This is either links to web pages or print articles that you are quoting from. What you know from personal experience is not enough. NtheP (talk) 21:48, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Intelectual123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Intelectual123 (talk) 21:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No reason for unblock given. Peridon (talk) 21:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Julia Mora

The article Julia Mora has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Guy (Help!) 21:07, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Julia Mora for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julia Mora is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Mora until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Black Kite (talk) 00:06, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]