Jump to content

User talk:Intelcub

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2023

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 22:46, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I successfully edit and create pages in various languages, I do not intend to spam or advertise. I help creative people to be properly represented in the encyclopedia. Please reconsider your decision. Intelcub (talk) 22:58, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Intelcub (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I successfully edit and create pages in various languages, I do not intend to spam or advertise. I help creative people to be properly represented in the encyclopedia. Please reconsider your decision. Intelcub (talk) 23:06, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't see anything here but promotion of a management company and its clients. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 23:28, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Intelcub (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Perhaps you do not see the final version of my work, since I edited it and prepared it for posting, and at this stage there was a blocking. I use public and historical data to generate information about artists, actors, and also post information about some films.Intelcub (talk) 23:33, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is an answer to the previous decline, but doesn't state a case for unblock. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:50, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Intelcub (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I ask once again to treat me carefully dear administrators. I don't plan to break the rules of the community, I want to be able to do useful things for the community again and again. :One of the examples of an article made about a famous musician :https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%84%D0%B2%D1%87%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BA%D0%BE_%D0%9A%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%8F%D0%BD_%D0%94%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%82%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B8%D1%87 :I posted an article about many films and artists in other countries. I have also prepared these versions for the English page. Blocking does not allow me to successfully convey information to the user. Perhaps I made a mistake by starting the placement from the company's page, and not from the page of one of the films. :I admit that I hurried with the publication of an unfinished article. I undertake to be more attentive to the English version of the site in the future. Intelcub (talk) 09:11, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This isn't convincing that you actually understand why you were blocked in the first place. A general statement that you'll follow the rules in the future is fairly meaningless if you can't adequately convince us that you've learnt. stwalkerster (talk) 21:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Intelcub (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I admit my mistake and that I did not carefully follow the rules, I realize that my material was not prepared for publication. From now on, I promise to be serious about the published materials. Please unblock me. Thanks a lot.

Decline reason:

This has no more meaning than your previous, declined, unblock requests. WP:GAB explains how to write an appropriate unblock request. Yamla (talk) 20:14, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

There is also 1 remaining unblock request, which hasn't accepted & declined, see the top of the talk page. 95.132.186.233 (talk) 08:13, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Intelcub (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

  • block is no longer necessary because I understand what are blocked for, I will not do it again, and I will make productive contributions instead;
  • I promise to use the account more for advertising or promotion;
  • this was not done intentionally due to little experience;
  • I have contributed in other languages and hope to do so successfully in English for the whole community Intelcub (talk) 20:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This still doesn't adequately address the reasons for the block and just repeats general platitudes back to us. I assume that you meant to say you will not "use the account for more advertising or promotion". You will need to provide specific discussion demonstrating your understanding of relevant policies and your connection with the subjects of your edits. You will now have to do that via WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 08:28, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

is closed. Run it through the ringer and shake it all out, and what you are left with is the intent to go on promoting Tauron. The subject of WP:UPE has not been broached, but I think it a possibility. User UTRS banned x 6 months. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Tuaron per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tuaron. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Cabayi (talk) 07:55, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]