User talk:95.132.186.233

RFPU

Is this you? If so, weren't you asked under that IP address to stop making RFPU requests? 47.227.95.73 (talk) 13:19, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, I think it's another person who made similar edits. 95.132.186.233 (talk) 13:36, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:38, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.132.186.233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will revert vandalism. Also, my last edit was constructive.

Decline reason:

No, you were mostly wasting other's time with pointless arguments and protection requests. If you continue to do so after this block, you will be blocked for a longer duration. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:03, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.132.186.233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not disrupt Wikipedia. I'm not going to send unprotection requests and will revert vandalism instead. 95.132.186.233 (talk) 14:11, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are obviously the same person as 178.95.99.242. Based on this warning issued six days ago, I can tell you that further pointless requests at RfPP will be met with blocks of increasing length, no matter which IP or account you use. Favonian (talk) 15:18, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm not 178.95.99.242. I did not make edits made by 178.95.99.242. It was another person. Edits by my current IP Address were the only edits which I made. 95.132.186.233 (talk) 16:46, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even though you two both make the exact same type of edits, in the exact same style, made the same RFPU requests, and trace back to the exact same city? I doubt that. 47.227.95.73 (talk) 18:41, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

95.132.186.233 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won't be sending unprotection requests to articles anymore. Will it be OK to request a protection of the article (because of vandalism)?

Decline reason:

You are clearly just trolling us with these unblock requests so I have extended your block to 72 hours. Yamla (talk) 16:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

July 2023

This is your only warning; if you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments again, as you did at User talk:ClueBot Commons, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Technopat (talk) 06:31, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? Do you mean that I changed others people's comments? I did not do so. On User talk:ClueBot Commons, I only changed that ClueBot NG is a Wikipedia bot, not a computer program. That doesn't mean that I changed other people's comments. Also, please provide a valid reason for reverting edits in the future, because it's not clear why you reverted my edit. 95.132.186.233 (talk) 06:58, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unnecessary actions

Hi 95.132.186.233, you're overreacting and making non-useful statements (stating the obvious, for example) in your requests for administrative attention. I'll block you with a long duration if you continue; please find something unrelated to patrolling others' contributions, perhaps off-Wikipedia, to do instead. This is a final warning. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:45, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But is it allowed in this case to revert vandalism? 95.132.186.233 (talk) 08:49, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, you're trolling; you're out. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:50, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for Persistently making disruptively unnecessary requests for administrative action, asking questions that have been answered before and clerking noticeboards in a way that is either trolling or similar enough to it to justify a long-duration block, looking at the history of this page here alone. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 08:51, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

ToBeFree, is it possible that other IP ranges can be checked from the page history of Talk:Voyager 2? It's no coincidence that the other IPs are the same person when looking at the post timing and their individual edit histories. This behavior has persisted for around a year and I can expand on it if needed. – The Grid (talk) 13:51, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll fill in the general info:

95.132.186.233 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
2A02:2378:1181:DEB6:0:0:0:1 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))
93.72.29.12 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

All of them use the same ISP from Ukraine. – The Grid (talk) 13:57, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I never used this IP Address, 95.132.186.233. My current IP Address, 93.72.29.12 is the only one I have used since 2021. I am the same person as from 2021, when I made my first edit. 93.72.29.12 (talk) 18:53, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I also found another, probably the same ISP, from Ukraine, 195.5.3.58. 93.72.29.12 (talk) 18:58, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The Grid, thanks for the ping. I currently can't investigate this, sorry. If the connection is plausible enough to justify a closer look and/or a block, please create a report at WP:SPI (reports about IPs are rare but can be created too) with diff links showing the connection. Thank you very much in advance! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:24, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.