User talk:Inspiringflow1

Welcome!

Hello, Inspiringflow1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and Please read and comply with WP:PAID. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:12, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Inspiringflow1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:13, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Hello, Inspiringflow1, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:14, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Inspiringflow1. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Inspiringflow1. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Inspiringflow1|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:18, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:24, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not for self promotion

You (and your other account Inspiringflow) appear to be on Wikipedia for the sole purpose of promoting yourself and any organisation associated with you. This is not the purpose of Wikipedia. With the organisation you have not complied with the mandatory paid editing disclosure. You are using two accounts, which is only allowed in very restricted circumstances. The circumstances of your using two do not seem to meet those restricted circumstances. You do not appear to be here to create an encyclopaedia. Instead you appear to be here to seek to enhance your personal reputation.

There are many websites where you may do that, including your own. Here, it is against all policies. Please cease and desist. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:03, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, how are you?

I hope you're well.

I apologize for the two accounts; it was my mistake. I thought that one account could only be used for one version of Wikipedia, whereas the same account can be used for both the English and French Wikipedias.

The error was mine.

If you could delete the inspiringflow1 account so that only the inspiringflow account remains, I would be very grateful.

Thank you.

Regarding compensation, I would like to inform you that I am not being paid in any way. I write the articles without any remuneration, so I am not paid at all for the articles I write.

For the previous article that you converted to a draft, could you please tell me how to rewrite it in a way that complies with your Wikipedia regulations?

I would also like to clarify that I am not on Wikipedia for self-promotion, but simply to write articles. Thank you.

Additionally, regarding the Thierry Rayer article, I wrote it with reliable and independent sources that are authoritative, coming from prestigious sources such as Forbes, Arabnews, and the French, Emirati, and UNESCO ministries. The style used is similar to that employed at UNESCO and in the cultural world. Furthermore, the Circle provides knowledge transmission for free. Could you please assist me and let me know how to proceed, as I am only copying what they write? Thank you in advance.

I would like to write more articles in the fields of art and education and would like to work with other contributors, if possible.

Could you please let me know what to do, how to write it, what points should not be mentioned, and what points should be included to ensure it complies with Wikipedia's rules? Inspiringflow (talk) 17:31, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With respect, this is your organisation, founded by you. You receive benefit from your name being associated with it. Your reputation is enhanced. Thus you are subject to the rules for paid editing.

You say "I am not on Wikipedia for self-promotion, but simply to write articles" but your editing history differs from that diametrically. Special:Contributions/Inspiringflow1 and Special:Contributions/Inspiringflow both show that you are not here for any other purpose. You may wish to comment on that to prove that you are here to write article about entities other than yourself and your organisation(s). Wikipedia is not here for you to enhance your reputation.

Users may not be deleted. Period. It may have been a mistake, but it is a mistake you are perpetuating by slipping between them. This account is the one you wish to be deleted, yet this account is the one you are using.

To save yourself from making this mistake again deploy {{Admin help me}} (read how to use it before deploying it) on this page or the other page, but not both, in a new section and ask for it to be blocked, explaining your error, and please do this as a matter of importance. Transparency is everything, as it is with a formal declaration of paid editing. Not sure if you are a paid editor? Declare it anyway. It save a whole world of painful explanations

_____

With regard to writing the article correctly your history makes it seem that you are impervious to advice, but I will try.

Your concept of independent sources and of reliable sources differs from Wikipedia's. Press release and PR pierces are primary sources. Do not use them. For Forbes, see WP:FORBESCON, where you will understand that Forbes often contains unreliable material. You also do not understand significant coverage. A trademark registration is neither significant coverage, nor is it useful to verify notability. Anyone can register a trademark. It signifies that money has been exchanged for a set of right.

You have written this advert for your organisation backwards. Instead of saying what you want to say and scratching around for references for it, do the reverse. Find all the references for it, real references. We need references for an organisation as follows:

We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS please. See WP:42. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain or this draft to be accepted. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

Marshall them into a storyboard, and write, in your own words (that means not a close paraphrase nor a direct translation), what they say. Wikipedia has absolutely no interest in what you wish to say about your organisation, nor what it wishes to say about itself. We are only interested in what is said about it in significant coverage, in multiple reliable independent sources.

However, recognise that you are likely to be unable to write this article on you own organisation in an unbiased manner. It takes a rare editor to be able to do that. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:14, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cercle d'Études Scientifiques Pierre Rayer. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:05, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 18:37, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]