User talk:Inorap

March 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to To Pimp a Butterfly has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: To Pimp a Butterfly was changed by Inorap (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956011 on 2015-03-23T00:28:56+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:28, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cilvia Demo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SZA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cilvia Demo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page XXL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 90059. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 14:02, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Troy Ave, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 16:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rae Sremmurd, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trap. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

I reverted your recent edits to Kanye West album articles. Metacritic's score for each album is duly noted and elaborated on in the prose of the sections on Critical reception of the album(s), so the addition of it in a ratings template meant to supplement the prose is giving that score undue weight (WP:NPOV). Also, most readers who aren't music geeks will most likely not know what an "aggregate score" or Metacritic is, so it's best left explained in the prose IMO. You also rearranged Rolling Stone and Slant Magazine's scores in some of the articles, which didn't make sense; "S" goes after "R", not before. If you still feel otherwise, you may start a discussion proposing your change or continue here, but do not restore your edits (WP:BOLD). Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 02:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Black on Both Sides was reverted. The Source does not use a star-rating system. Do not use {{rating|4|5}} where the source does not use stars, because it is inaccurate and misleading (Template:Rating#When to use this template) Dan56 (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Compton (album). It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Rob van vee 09:52, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Section.80. Jim1138 (talk) 02:38, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did here at Lemonade (Beyoncé album), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. The star-rating template should not be used in instances where the source does not use a star-rating system. Dan56 (talk) 01:59, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Lemonade (Beyoncé album). Dan56 (talk) 21:01, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Under Pressure, you may be blocked from editing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:10, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at The Impossible Kid (album). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 153.206.140.136 (talk) 21:14, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Z (EP) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:54, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Z (EP). TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 00:53, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 153.204.104.88 (talk) 00:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One of the problems with your edits is that you are not using an edit summary to explain what you're doing. Changing the genre of a music article is generally a contentious edit and should be discussed beforehand. When you don't discuss, don't explain the edit with an edit summary, and keep making the same edit over and over, then editors come to the conclusion that your edits are more disruptive to the encyclopedia than helpful. —C.Fred (talk) 01:02, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Chance the Rapper, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. 153.163.71.173 (talk) 03:54, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Chance 3 with this edit. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to 10 Day (mixtape), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. 153.228.51.125 (talk) 03:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Coloring Book (mixtape), you may be blocked from editing. 153.207.166.34 (talk) 08:26, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Acid Rap, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Juke. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did here at Under Pressure (album), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. The star-rating template should not be used in instances where the source does not use a star-rating system. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked for editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at The Incredible True Story. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, template, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to All Got Our Runnins with edit, you may be blocked from editing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 20:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked for editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at DS2. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:29, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Inorap. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

As much as I declined to take action in that report against you, this is obviously not okay and will lead to your block all the same if you don't stop. Don't do that anymore. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 22:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Inorap. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:01, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Inorap. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]