User talk:InfiniteNexus/Archive 29

Archive 25

←

Archive 27

Archive 28

Archive 29

Focus on the editor

Please look in the mirror. After not reading the responses and the sources fully (that's why I asked that normal question), you are the one alleging that I "falsely claimed" and accused someone (you?) with my "speculation/misinformation" edit summary (which was about the notes and the reception section edit, but you took it personally) while writing that I do not understand the topic ("who may not have fully understood — such as yourself"). And I definitely don't have any sentences questioning "your intelligence". So instead of attacking and creating scenarios every time you see me (it's not helping to make any progress), you can defend your argument by focusing on providing valid reasons that do not oppose MOS:FILMPLOT (and WP:SYNTH, etc.). ภץאคгöร 13:49, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

@Nyxaros: I don't want to go off on this tangent for too long, but "attack" is a strong word and I didn't "attack" you. It's true that your behavior has been known to be hostile; you must understand that we're all here to improve the encyclopedia and that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort. When I said that you didn't "understand", I meant you didn't understand the plot point, which was a testament to the fact that these explanatory footnotes will be helpful. I wasn't insinuating your lack of knowledge in "the topic".

Now, let's refocus on the substance of the argument, which comprised 90% of my latest comment, but of course you chose to focus on the 10% (so your comment here is quite ironic). You can defend your argument by focusing on providing valid reasons that do not oppose MOS:FILMPLOT (and WP:SYNTH, etc.) I did — several times. SYNTH doesn't have anything to do with this, though. InfiniteNexus (talk) 15:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Is that why you are still trying to make snide comments like "your behavior is known to be hostile"? You have been commenting on me since you opened the discussion. So, leaving aside your personal grievance against me that nobody cares about (and your opinion that "I didn't understand"), you should also learn what WP:SYNTH is: To, in this case persistently, make a claim that is not explicitly mentioned in the source, for example an Engineer's face. ภץאคгöร 16:22, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

While I'm disturbed by this continued hostility, again, I'm not going to continue with this back-and-forth. The Engineers example you gave was not SYNTH, which means combining sources to reach an OR conclusion; at most, it was an inaccurate summary of the sources — the reason for this is that the original text wasn't even summarizing the sources; it was citing the film itself, per PLOTCITE. If you see the film, you can clearly see that the hybrid has a face resembling an Engineer, but whatever. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:35, 19 August 2024 (UTC)

Category talk:Microsoft templates

Hello, InfiniteNexus,

There is no need to create this category talk page because the category page, Category:Microsoft templates, was deleted years ago. I've run into this situation with other editors who created unneeded category talk pages for deleted categories and whatever tool you are using that says creating a page like this is necessary, has a bug. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:55, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

@Liz: Sorry, that was my bad. I meant to edit Category talk:Microsoft-related templates and accidentally ended up at the wrong page. Thanks for letting me know and fixing my mistake. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)

About Gemini

In the revision https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gemini_(language_model)&diff=prev&oldid=1240044180, you removed the statement about Oppo and Xiaomi integrating Gemini, claiming they are not notable. But why is the content about Samsung retained? 内存溢出的猫 (talk) 02:14, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Reliable, secondary sources are needed to demonstrate notability; simply citing primary sources on the announcement does not indicate that the information is noteworthy, or else we would need to include every minor update to Gemini. In any case, we do not need to mention every company that integrates Gemini into their products — Oppo and Xiaomi were neither the first to do so, nor are they highly prominent players in the smartphone industry, nor is this partnership particularly impactful or extraordinary, so this information is unlikely to interest most readers. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review for Chromecast

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Chromecast. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 108.44.167.147 (talk) 17:22, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

This page has not been nominated for deletion. InfiniteNexus (talk) 22:24, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

fuck

on Google pixel 9 was android 15 178.36.4.86 (talk) 10:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

It was not. [1] [2] This is discussed in the article under § Software. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:05, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

CoStar Group updates

Hi InfiniteNexus, I proposed a page restructure for CoStar Group, a real estate analytics company that also owns online marketplaces. As you are involved in WP:Companies, I would appreciate your help in reorganizing the page. Thank you very much, Hbensur (talk) 19:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

@Hbensur: Reviewed and  Implemented, see comments on the talk page. InfiniteNexus (talk) 21:57, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Why is the Pixel a considered mid-range if the Pixel and Pixel Pro aren't?

They use the same processor, and 90/120 Hz is not a requirement. As an example, the iPhone 16 (non-Pro) has a 60 Hz display. VitAlv13 (talk) 11:46, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Because they are clearly marketed as such, and you can easily find various sources labeling it as such. The lower price point alone makes the A-series definitively "mid-range", which is the encyclopedic/formal term for "cheaper/more affordable/lite version" and the most common descriptor used to describe the A-series. The A-series is the mid-range counterpart of the Pixel and Pixel Pro, which are the flagship models. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

And is the iPhone 16 (non-Pro) the mid-range version of the iPhone? And the iPhone even has a worse processor. (A18 VS A18 Pro) VitAlv13 (talk) 15:15, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

No one calls it it a mid-range device. The iPhone equivalent to the Pixel A-series (e.g. Pixel 8a) is the iPhone SE. The base-model iPhone (e.g. iPhone 16) is equivalent to the base-model Pixel (e.g. Pixel 9); the pro-model iPhone (e.g. iPhone 16 Pro) is equivalent to the pro-model Pixel (e.g. Pixel 9 Pro). WP:GREATWRONGS; we simply document what sources use, and frankly, it would be ludicrous to try to prove that sources say otherwise. I'll also just say that specs alone are not the only determinant of "mid-range"; the vast price difference (well, it's shrunk in recent years, but there's still a difference, and they continue to market and launch the phones separately) is a pretty clear indicator. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:57, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

CoStar Group further suggestions

Hi InfiniteNexus, thank you for your help in restructuring the CoStar Group article. I appreciated your comment about the Criticisms section, and proposed a suggestion for how to merge the content into the article. If you have some time to look it over and update accordingly, I think it would further improve the article. Thank you! Hbensur (talk) 15:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

 Done – I've cleaned up the entire article. InfiniteNexus (talk) 18:41, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:39, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done InfiniteNexus (talk) 23:39, 15 November 2024 (UTC)