User talk:IndigoJo

Welcome!

Hello, IndigoJo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Avant-garde a clue-hexa Chord ² 10:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kesgrave Hall School

I was in the first intake at the school (under Mr Shepherd) when it was definitely referred to as a school for "maladjusted boys with a high IQ". That predates whatever prospectus you might have, and I'm not entirely comfortable with the term "strong academic bent" either. What's you issue with "high IQ"? Greyskinnedboy Talk 10:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably better to keep all threads of a discussion together (so I've posted your response back here). Greyskinnedboy Talk 20:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The prospectus I read was printed in the early 1980s, under Shepherd's (sp?) headship, and mentioned several of the staff of that era. I don't know if we still have it or where it is; perhaps one of the other guys has it or could distribute a scanned copy. The prospectus was still in use until 1990; Mike Smith had a new prospectus printed in 1990 (there is a picture of me and Darren Young reading one of my computer magazines in Nelson dorm in there). I don't recall IQ per se being mentioned as a criteria in all the time I was there; the talk was of bright or intelligent boys and academic ability. If IQ was a criterion, we would have had to take an IQ test before entering, which I didn't and don't recall anyone mentioning it.

Other schools did use IQ; Bicknell school in Bournemouth did, and the headmaster of that school told me and my parents that he had removed a pupil from that school for coming below-par in an IQ test. Very few pupils were expelled from KHS while I was there (1989-93) and never for that reason. IQ is actually a controversial test of intelligence and not all education authorities would have used it.

You can find a definition of "bent" here and that's what the authors of the prospectus meant by it:

1 a: a strong inclination or interest : bias b: a special inclination or capacity : talent —Preceding unsigned comment added by IndigoJo (talk • contribs) 19:20, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I'm not sure I recall seeing "high IQ" ever written down, so we'll go with your affirmation of "academic bent" being in the school prospectus. It's good to have a thrust and parry to get to the bottom of things. Thanks for your patience. Greyskinnedboy Talk 20:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the "citation to prospectus" - can you please provide a link to a scanned copy ? --Mrodgers2099 (talk) 09:45, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your rather rude post to my talk page :

1. I am not dictating what any one edits.

2. the reason for the request (I was not insisting) for a link to a scanned copy of the 20 year old prospectus was out of interest - and since the threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth, I just wanted to make sure that the page was correct. --Mrodgers2099 (talk) 15:10, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re your comments on the talk page 10:01, 15 August 2009, where you write :

but from a KHS point of view it was just the last chapter in the whole sorry KHS story

I was going to send this as a direct messgae, but as you have that option off I will say it here.

A wikipedia article has to be of a Neutral point of view (WP:NPOV) comments like that could imply that your views on the school may be tarnished. Mrodgers2099 (talk) 12:25, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To IndigoJo : WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK YOU ARE DEMANDING TO KNOW WHO I AM OR TO DECIDE WHAT IS IRRELEVANT - LET THE READERS OF THE KESGRAVE HALL ARTICLE DECIDE FOR THEMSELVES OR ARE YOU SCARED WHAT CONCLUSIONS INFORMED READERS WILL THINK OF YOU !! When you no longer claim on your user page to be the main author, I will edit it to reflect that. The rest as it is true stays. Codf1977 (talk) 14:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kesgrave Hall. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Please see Kesgrave Hall Talk Mrodgers2099 (talk) 18:29, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IndigoJo I hope you were not makeing that comment on my talk page as a threat. As I said on the KH talk page you are acting like a bully trying to decide for everyone else what is relevant. It should be up to the reader to decide what is important. It should not be up to one individual acting only in self interest. Codf1977 (talk) 13:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IndigoJo, I do think that your "If I had posted a rant against the staff or management, let alone the pupils, at Wikipedia then you might have a point" and "It is a personal attack and has no relevance" Talk:Kesgrave Hall(16:25, 19 August 2009) is a little hypocritical. I can't help but notice you were happy to leave a rant and personal attack about someone else on the page for nearly six months last year, I know you did not make the edit in question but you were remiss in your obligations to Wikipedia not to try and do something about it. Mrodgers2099 (talk) 12:01, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion about the relevance of a paragraph added by Codf1977 to the Kesgrave Hall School (1976 - 1973) section of the Kesgrave Hall page has been moved to Talk:Kesgrave Hall School following a section split. Please continue discussion here.

IndigoJo, I have spit the KHS section off onto a new page Kesgrave Hall School and I have made it clear on both pages about the close links between KHS and Shawe Manor. Please if you have any more information about Shawe Manor, such as the month in 1993 it "opened" (and thus KHS closed) and the month it closed please can you add it. Mrodgers2099 (talk) 19:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IndigoJo, Re edit about current occupation of former headmaster, Michael G Smith - I am fairly sure that it is in breach of the following policy Biographies of living persons [WP:BLP] - the section "Privacy of personal information" as you have posted contact information via a link to a website not maintained by him. Mrodgers2099 (talk) 05:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep deleting the section I add ? - leave it in, if you must change it then edit it, but as it as far as i can see does not go against any policy I have no idea why you keep deleting it.

Codf1977 (talk) 11:32, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

IndigoJo, I am lost for words about your blog and youtube post. You have played into Codf1977's hands. You are, by your actions, making yourself part of the story. Like it or not now your comments are becoming relevant as you are discussing them in context of the school. But by showing him (or her) that they are getting to you, they are going to carry on.

I would also like you to understand that it is a fundamental right that Wikipedia grants all it's readers and editors to remain anonymous and just because you have chosen not to remain anonymous that does not give you the right to criticise others who have chosen not to.

Before (or when) you delete Codf1977's comments AGAIN (which I am sure you are going to do) can you please post here or on the KHS talk page what is your reason. If it is simply you believe you are not a notable ex-pupil, that is not for you to say and you need to find another reason. Mrodgers2099 (talk) 12:33, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As some one who has edited the Kesgrave Hall School page, can I have your help on a number of issues relating to the page. I have posted to the Talk page. Mrodgers2099 (talk) 08:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sign you posts

Please can you remember to sign your posts on talk pages, especially other users profile talk pages. Greyskinnedboy Talk 11:33, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Matthew Yusuf Smith

I have removed the notability template on the Matthew Yusuf Smith page, for the reasons I have outlined on the Talk page. Codf1977 (talk) 15:58, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Matthew Yusuf Smith

The article Matthew Yusuf Smith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Over opionanated blogger with no real importance.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mrodgers2099 (talk) 20:17, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matthew Yusuf Smith for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Matthew Yusuf Smith, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Yusuf Smith until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mrodgers2099 (talk) 12:05, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A roads in Zone 2 of the Great Britain numbering scheme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stockbridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, IndigoJo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, IndigoJo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, IndigoJo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testimony (Ferron album) (September 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NALBUM.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Testimony (Ferron album) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 23:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, IndigoJo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 23:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Testimony (Ferron album) has been accepted

Testimony (Ferron album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 12:09, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shadows on a Dime has been accepted

Shadows on a Dime, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Bilorv (talk) 15:17, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phantom Center (Ferron album) has been accepted

Phantom Center (Ferron album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mach61 (talk) 23:11, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]