User talk:Indian editor television

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indian editor television (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock! What technical evidence do u guys have? Indian editor television (talk) 14:57, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You must be joking. I don't often see a sockpuppet case as blatantly obvious as this one. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

IP address confirmation, as well as other technical data; also, behavioral evidence says that it's likely you are the same. Any more denials? Origamite^{\(·_·\)(/·_·)/} 18:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Indian editor television (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sock! Indian editor television (talk) 10:45, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Technical evidence says otherwise! OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:48, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Indian editor television, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Indian editor television! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:15, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

False edit summaries

Please note that I have reverted a number of your edits. You noted in your edit summaries that you "removed unsourced info", however in a number of cases, Akashdeep Saigal for example, the information you removed did indeed contain sources. Please ensure you are leaving accurate and valid edit summaries when removing content from articles. Thank you, --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:52, 25 August 2014 (UTC) Hello i did not create any false edit summaries, the sources used in the akaashdeep sehgal page are not valid sources[reply]

other edit summary issues

At Wikipedia, we assume that other editors are trying to make a better encyclopedia. In edit summaries such as "seems like u have some issues with the person in question," you are making an assumption of bad faith, particularly when the initial edits that you are reverting come with identification of the policies on which the changes were made. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why are you removing sources and information, it is not correct, and why are you only focusing on positives, as in why putting the co-stars name makes him look famous? and why do u have issues if it does? please discuss your queries on the talk page, please

Writing ENCYCLOPEDIA articles

Note that we are writing ENCYCLOPEDIA articles, in this case one ABOUT Karan Singh Grover not "all the names associated with him and his work". An actor has zero say about who they costar with - so neither Grover nor Basu had any say and their appearance together in an upcoming project and including the name has nothing relevant about the subject of the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 13:02, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

so first you go from demanding that costars be listed by name [1] to removing the fact that there are co-stars? ????? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 15:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why are u removing stuff without discussing on the talk page? please revert it back to the original, a few people should discuss how it should be written before u change it, regardsIndian editor television (talk) 15:14, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:50, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Josve05a/Alone

A tag has been placed on User:Josve05a/Alone, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Too late...already exists Alone (2015 film). G8 and U1 applies. Perhaps others as well

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. (t) Josve05a (c) 00:11, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]