User talk:IndianBio/Archive 17

Archive 10

←

Archive 15

Archive 16

Archive 17

Archive 18

Archive 19

Archive 20

Rihanna

On the other hand, I see you are also a fan of Rihanna. I want to propose you a collaboration on some of her articles, since I checked your impressive work which is really awesome! We should collaborate on a song/album/video, but like make it really major, GAN it and then FAC it! :D Any ideas? Ofc, If you accept the collabo. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 14:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I have the lead single from R8 in mind :P Of course I'm happy that you like my work and appreciate that you want to collaborate. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:52, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

OMG I just can't wait for the new music to come! Sure, we can do both the lead single and R8, but maybe something older too. Talk That Talk or Unapologetic kinda cry for attention tbh xD never bothered to fix them up tbh... — Tomíca^(T2ME) 14:54, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

From her older stuff "Don't Stop the Music" is my favorite. I'm not a big fan of TTT or U era songs except WFL (her best IMO). —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:56, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

"Don't Stop the Music" is her most iconic song tbh. I maintained the article pretty well I believe, but feel free to add info If you find something extra. :) TTT sucked imo, except WFL, TTT (song) and WHYB, the rest were RR and Loud leftovers. I kinda liked U better especially Diamonds, Stay and What Now... :) — Tomíca^(T2ME) 14:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

The only reason I bought U was because of "Stay" and "Love Without Tragedy". Tomica I wanted to ask you, I hope you have not got any grudge against me or Snuggums regarding the AFD issues involving Rihanna articles. We were truly acting in good faith. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:04, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I don't have nothing against you, because I felt that you did it in good faith. If I did I would never write on your talk lol. As for the former, I don't like his behavior on Wikipedia and he has been staple in making me traps a lot of times or stalking me crazily (IK he will read but idc)... :) — Tomíca^(T2ME) 15:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Ok lets not talk about this then anymore. So, Rihanna is still not announced as a performer for Grammys but I saw one tweet with eight navy anchors from Grammy account. Surely that must mean R8? —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 15:09, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Yeah I saw the tweet, tbh there is no other explanation for it rather than that. Also I heard this major rumor that she's gonna drop the album on the Grammy night, after the show finishes... I am going crazy !!! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 15:11, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Lol and just that we were talking about R8's lead single and "FourFiveSeconds" got released. The article is all yours, the song is atrocious :P —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:34, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

OMG! Really? I fucking love it!!! It's awesome according to me, all grown Rihanna. I am done of her EDM shit tbh, I wanted this, just an acoustic guitar and her vocals no autotune no shit... I am so happy! :D — Tomíca^(T2ME) 12:11, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Can you please AFD this BS? All fan made non sense. — Tomíca^(T2ME) 17:48, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Tomica, all done. And great that you love the song. I'm still not into it yet, but its a little better. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:59, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Taylor Swift's claim sales

Hi, Yes I know that 175m-claim of her sales is inflated but I believe you're already know that Swift's certification sales has reach 118m. So, the 110m-claim is no longer reliable.

I just want to encourage the media to release the better claim sales for Swift or at least same like the claim sales I have found for her.

Therefore we're not only count just one claim sales source from New Strait Times but also many options.

When Swift's certification sales pass 125m. I will update her claim sales in her Bio and I hope you agree with me.

Need your advise also. Thanks Politsi (talk) 09:28, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga: Cheek to Cheek Live!

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga: Cheek to Cheek Live! you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 23W -- 23W (talk) 06:21, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

The Prismatic World Tour

My username is Kobsters1 and you reverted an edit I made to The Prismatic World Tour page. All I did was correctly add the 6 new dates Katy Perry announced today for the tour on both her official website and official Twitter page. Kobsters1 (talk) 07:19, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

@Kobsters1:, when you provided the dates, you should provide sources as well. Her twitter page is not deemed reliable, so it has to come from an official source like the tour page, live nation or katyperry.com. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 08:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

@IndianBio:, When I added the dates under the Shows link I sourced her official website which had the Asian dates which I had added.

Your GA nomination of Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga: Cheek to Cheek Live!

The article Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga: Cheek to Cheek Live! you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga: Cheek to Cheek Live! for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 23W -- 23W (talk) 07:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga: Cheek to Cheek Live!

The article Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga: Cheek to Cheek Live! you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga: Cheek to Cheek Live! for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 23W -- 23W (talk) 07:41, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Re:January 2015

What disruptive editing are you talking about? I fixed the sample's description and you reverted it as if it was vandalism. Stop tagging user's pages with vandalism when it is clearly not. Please restore the sample yourself. MaRAno ^FAN 14:26, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

@MaranoFan: your page was warned for disruptive editing, not vandalism. You have continuously edit warred, uploaded samples and screenshots failing WP:NFCC and failed to understand that Wikipedia does not promote addition of non-free content without any critical commentary or any text to aid the reader. Time and time again this has been explained to you in WP:FFD and in addition to that, coming from a block you have again started to engage in WP:EW. Toe your line carefully, administrators are watching you. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:29, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Now, would you please restore the sample with the fixed description? MaRAno ^FAN 14:31, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

@MaranoFan:, no as I have explained, it fails WP:NFCC#8. There is nothing in the article that describes or aids the reader in understanding the sample and why it is needed. Check an article like that of Rihanna's "FourFiveSeconds" and see how the sample is actually aiding the reader, and not added just as a decoration. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Your revert

Do you know what a singer-songwriter is? And are you not interested in bringing Madonna back to FA status? (Why I put Michigan up there).--A21sauce (talk) 17:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

@A21sauce: Which of Madonna's work are you asserting is in the folk-acoustic tradition, as described in the singer-songwriter article? You should probably discuss to get discussion to change away from what appears to be consensus that Madonna is a singer and a songwriter but not a singer-songwriter; IndianBio's revert to the status quo appears to be in order. —C.Fred (talk) 17:40, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

@A21sauce: I am perfectly aware of the term, and Madonna is not a singer-songwriter. She is a singer, and a songwriter. And you are linking common terms like American and actor and businesswoman which are not allowed per WP:OVERLINK. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Thanks C.Fred. IndianBio, I don't buy your rationale about the overlink. Go into any featured article and you will find this set-up. I won't fight you on this, though as I have bigger fish to fry.--A21sauce (talk) 17:48, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Super Bowl XLVI halftime show, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mirrorball and Barco. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Super Bowl halftime

Bro, I couldn't help but notice your sandbox work for the Super Bowl XLVI halftime show, and it's quite impressive. When do you think you'll transfer it over to the main article? Also, would you mind helping me out with Super Bowl XLIX halftime article?? I first made the redirect back in October, and plan to work on the article after the event takes place. I'm not sure I could take on this alone. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Snuggs, thanks buddy. I'm planning to move it by today I think, its pending from a long time. And yes we should start work on MissPurry's enigmatic moment too :D. I can't even imagine what she is gonna do, but Lenny Kravitz? Seriously? —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:29, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

No problem. I'm sure it'll go against many expectations, and was initially surprised myself to hear about Mr. Kravitz joining, but we must remember that Ms. Hudson isn't exactly the most predictable person in the world :P. Here's what Time guesses she'll perform. All I do know is that more KatyCats than ever will be watching. For now, I'm listing sources at Talk:Super Bowl XLIX halftime show, and will take this to DYK after the show takes place. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:44, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: Voila! —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Lovely start :3 Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:47, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Snuggs I believe Katy's article can become as good as Madonna's in my sandbox. We need similar sources like the development, costumes, light and stage setup etc. I wish we knew who she is collaborating with, like Madonna did with Cirque du Soleil. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

So do I, but something tells me we won't get that info until after the show happens. As for Madge, TRANSFER THAT FUCKER OVER TO MAINSPACE! Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:56, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

A no fan comment: No offense, but I just hope she doesn't sound like this during the performance! :P — Tomíca^(T2ME) 14:21, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

True Tomica, her Teenage Dream era live performances were simply not good. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Indeed. There is a slight improvement now for this era (although she relies a lot on the back vocals too, talking about the VMA's "Roar" performance), however, this was sad too :(. She ruined my fav Prism song... — Tomíca^(T2ME) 14:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I didn't understand how was she so-so-so bad that day :O —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I'll pass on watching that video, Roar is my favorite Prism song too. I've also heard bad things about Taylor Swift's live performances too, at least she's not at the Super Bowl. ^{(I still had an eye on your page because of the earlier thread)} --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 20:03, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Haha i'm aware this comment is random but I agree with Snuggums, the Super Bowl article is awesome. Great work! — TheMadonnaMusicCN (talk, contribs) 23:24, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

@Themadonnamusiccn:, thanks a lot. It has FA potential I believe, long way to go though. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 13:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

I guess she didn't sound that bad ("Firework" hurt my ears a bit though), however, the whole performance was such a kitsch, it was insane. I didn't like it tbh, Madonna's was kinda better! — Tomíca^(T2ME) 08:22, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Madonna's and Beyonce's was in a different level. Katy did what she does the best, she did a colorful display of her biggest hits and she was good at it. I did not like the sharks and the palm tree parts, but the opening and closing was just too good. And is it me or the crowd was particularly boring this year? —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 08:28, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

I think that the crowd was bored, not boring :). Haha. Well that's why I dislike about Perry, she acts like 17-year old (even that the Teenage Dream era is over. The beginning was interesting, the final was "earhurt". I didn't like Beyonce's, it was kinda boring too, Bruno and Madonna were good :). — Tomíca^(T2ME) 13:02, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

I started watching Super Bowl when Madonna performed. It was such an event in my country (Sri Lanka). And we were blown away by it, especially when the field sucked up the grass and the giant eye appeared. We were like, is that happening for real? But I have to confess that I really liked Katy's opening better than Madonna's. Burno Mars, hmmmm, I don't know what I saw, especially his dancing. Let's just say I didn't have breakfast. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 13:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Need your explanation

I don't know the reason why but I've seen in the List of Best-Selling artists. The source section for the claim sales from the newspaper has been change from Publisher to work?

This is confusing for me because make the claim source look not quite beautiful. Thanks Politsi (talk) 09:15, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

@Politsi:, as per {{cite news}} the main source from where we are taking the content is the "work" parameter. The publisher parameter is kind of decomissioned now. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 09:36, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Then why not change all remark on that parameter section, there are still a lot of source with Publisher parameter? Do you need my help to do it? Politsi (talk) 10:47, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes we can do it. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 11:06, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

Living for love

What do you mean by this?

"Please do not add Inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Living For Love; It Is Considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -Indian: BIO"

I'm just changing to the original single cover, you're uploading the remix cover and the living for love article is not about the remix. It's about the single, so my cover is correct.

Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bjornamerus (talk • contribs) 10:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Wrong!

What's wrong with the text? Today, I came across that article. That article say about her and others too. IF it was not true I would not have added. Also, I didnt wrote that TOI as its media, who is writing about her much like Balan's Femal Hero. If its peacock for Chopra then, its also for Balan.—Prashant 18:55, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes it is, for the lead, I did not say its inappropriate for the article body. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 18:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Off course not. I mean Its a perception of media much like for Balan. Come on Chopra wad called a Shero much before Vidya. But, nobody added in her article. I had tried but failed saying blah blah blah.We are not writingfiction. Its all true provided by the sources.—Prashant 19:04, 6 February 2015 (UTC) This calls her "the real Hero of Bollywood.—Prashant 19:09, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Blog entries and paid writing does not count as journalism. Anupama Chopra, a leading journalist, introduces Vidya as a female hero in this interview, amongst many other examples. Other than that one puffed-up column in TOI no one calls Priyanka Chopra a "shero". -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 04:02, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Your revert in the Rebel Heart article

I don't understand your reasons for reverting my edit. I simply removed an unsourced UK Super Deluxe Edition from the article and re-ordered the Japanese, FNAC and Super Deluxe editions into a more logical order. MsigDK (talk) 19:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Unsourced? The difference shows that the source was present. What are you talking about? —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 19:06, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

I am not sure why you are changing my edits - I OWN THE CDR-s and 12" vinyl in question -- and also there is nor ever was a PICTURE SLEEVE issued with any proms except in AUSTRALIA - if you don't know what you are talking about then do your homework. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TFWF12 (talk • contribs) 10:10, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia

Hey! Do you think Chopra's films can be listed on her Book page?—Prashant 08:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

They have to. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 08:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Okay, will do that. I was planning to create Portal and Wikiproject as she has a number of topics. Is it right to create or I should wait for sometime. I will nominate her awards list for FL and then, featured topics.—Prashant 08:59, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Portal is fine. But Wikiproject is kinda unnecessary. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 09:11, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

I dont understand about Wikiproject. I mean I see so many projects. Are they important?—Prashant 09:34, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

@Prashant!:, the music articles have wikiproject for many of the singers, however I have yet to see any such for the film actors being that they are not diversive enough. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 04:54, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I searched several wikiprojects to find out more about them. But, I got wikiprojects about musicians.—Prashant 06:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Legolas2186, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

–Chase (talk / contribs) 04:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

I think it's worth pointing out that despite the filed SPI, I do not harbor any resentment or bad feelings towards you. I admittedly remain cautious for many reasons already pointed out, but at this time I feel no need to more closely examine your edits and try to get you blocked – even if you are Legolas (and you insist you aren't, so I won't assume such), it doesn't appear you've done anything harmful here. I had edited with Legolas previously but was not aware until tonight of his alarming history with fabricating sources, which posed a huge risk to the integrity of Wikipedia. You happened to come to mind when I thought that he could still be out here due to many similarities. Please don't take it personally. For now, I will choose to believe you are being truthful and look forward to continuing to collaborate with you. –Chase (talk / contribs) 05:41, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

@Chasewc91: thanks for your message. I hope you do realize that I am contributing in some way or the other. Even I was not aware of Legolas2186 and his/her fabrications until Mr. Gonna Change My Name Forever notified me of GAR for PAparazzi and LoveGame. This was pretty shocking coming from you though. I know we have had our differences but I have always appreciated the hard work you have put here. So yeah, moving on and you should also from statements like "even if you are Legolas". I am taking offence to it. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:23, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Super Bowl XLIX halftime show

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:21, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Living For Love Debut at #36 US Billboard Pop Song

Debut No. 36 "Living For Love" Madonna

Madonna debuts on Pop Songs at No. 36 with "Living for Love," aided by concentrated on plays on several iHeartMedia-owned stations; for instance, WHTZ New York played it 19 times in the week ending Feb. 22, according to Nielsen Music, and KIIS Los Angeles spun it 16 times. She makes her 29th visit (dating to the chart's October 1992 launch) and first since 2012, when "Give Me All Your Luvin'," featuring Nicki Minaj and M.I.A., and "Girl Gone Wild" reached Nos. 24 and 38, respectively (sparked by notable plays at iHeartMedia; "Luvin' " aired hourly for nearly three days at the chain leading up to her Super Bowl halftime appearance that year). http://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/chart-beat/6480337/chart-highlights-madonnas-living-for-love-debuts-on-pop-songs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjavier1978 (talk • contribs) 13:36, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Madonna Awards

Well, why in MJ page they count as awards? List of awards and nominations received by Michael Jackson — Preceding unsigned comment added by LikeAVirginForEver (talk • contribs) 17:57, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

It should be removed from there as well, those are just listings and rankings, definitely not awards. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 18:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

"Sexxx Dreams"

Thanks for your edits to the article. I think it would be good to get the article to Good status eventually (shouldn't be too hard), so please let me know if you have any feedback. Or, if you work on the article more, I'm happy to co-nominate it. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 15:46, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Patrolled?

My notification said you patrolled me. Is that something I should be proud or be scared of? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mat 1997 (talk • contribs) 12:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

No I reverted one edit where you had removed "Wonderland", I had replaced it back. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 12:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Oh. Thank you! Yeah, I kind of messed with that. But I still removed "Wonderland" since it's not an official single yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mat 1997 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

The bonus tracks from the physical album is already available for purchase in the iTunes store but it is not an "official" single. Shake It Off, Blank Space and Style are the only released singles from 1989. I believe there has been a misinterpretation on that part. Mat 1997 (talk) 13:05, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Super Bowl XLVI halftime show

The article Super Bowl XLVI halftime show you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Super Bowl XLVI halftime show for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 08:00, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Deadline is March 7th. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi Snuggums I saw ur review. Will work on it today. Thanks again mate. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:24, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

My pleasure. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Promotional Material

I've made an edit in "Style (Taylor Swift song) and I got reported for promotional material? Explain where in my inputs did I promote something? I am merely editing to provide complete information regarding a subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Riot kiddo (talk • contribs) 10:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

So Help Me God

It's not a false title, but it's there's not enough info yet and obviously "FourFiveSeconds" isn't confirmed as being on the album.  — ₳aron 11:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

@Calvin999: thanks for the explanation, I thought that Rihanna announcing an album name I would have heard, turns out its Kanye's. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 11:37, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Taylor Swift Invite

You have been invited to join the Taylor Swift WikiProject, a WikiProject on the English Wikipedia dedicated to improving articles and lists related to Taylor Swift. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page and add your name to the list of participants. Thank You.

Thanks, I joined. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:39, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Indian Chart

Friend, I think it is official chart. Reason:

• It is done by The Times of India, which is a reputed newspaper.
• It also is archived unlike Saavn charts
• No other chart in India is archived
• This is the only chart which also gets printed in newspapers like Pune and Mumbai Mirror.

I don't get the reason how does it fails. Mike:Golu · ^{[ Confidential message ]} 07:15, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

It is a single network chart. Please consult WP:BADCHARTS. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 08:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

OK man, my bad. I thought this would be official. Sorry for wasting your time. But really isn't there any chart of India?Mike:Golu · ^{[ Confidential message ]} 08:39, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

There really isn't and its so bad that we do not have an official governing body like Billboard, IFPI or OCC. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 08:42, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rebel Heart (Madonna album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Le Grand Journal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Notability (music)

I have made a proposal for a change to the opening paragraph of Wikipedia:Notability (music). You have discussed similar issues on the article's talk page and would appreciate your input. Please see Wikipedia talk:Notability (music)#Do all of these guidelines imply GNG or are they stand-alone?. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Request

Hi friend! I have a request for you. I was wondering if you could review my FLC: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Salman Khan filmography/archive1. It has already two supports and I have sorted out the concerns there. Besides, are you planning to expand Gaga's awards list or something? --FrankBoy _(Buzz) 21:06, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Janet Jackson

An article that you have been involved in editing, Janet Jackson, has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. wia (talk) 23:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Re: Super Bowl XLVI halftime show

Congrats! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 01:23, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your help too AB. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 05:30, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Gentlemen, it was absolutely delightful reviewing a fantastic halftime show performance :) Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:42, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

IB, any plans for FA nomination? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 07:19, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

God, can I? FAs are really big and I'm not as patient as Snuggums. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 07:28, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

They are quite big indeed. Personally, I wouldn't ever recommend going for FA on any article without peer review beforehand, and certainly not right after becoming GA. Not sure if you've ever submitted anything for FA, but it is quite a venture if you ever go for that. I've been contemplating FA nominations myself for some articles, but don't know when I'll be ready for that. Snuggums (talk / edits) 07:42, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

No I have never submitted anything for FA, its a scary monster place. I would require your guidance Snuggums, seeing your efficiency with Katy Perry biography. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 16:35, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

She remains my masterpiece to this day and easily the article work I'm most proud of :3. Thanks again for your input on her page both before and during FAC :D. If you ever submit anything for FA, I'll tell you this: 1) check for dead links beforehand 2) make sure content is properly attributed to given citations 3) it could take a while; the average duration is about one month. I've been meaning to work on her other articles (among others), but haven't yet gotten around to working any of them up to GA/FA potential. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:44, 7 March 2015 (UTC)