User talk:Imxxd17

February 2023

Hello, I'm Ppt91. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Krasna Hora, Donetsk Oblast, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ppt91 (talk) 22:26, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Communist Party (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Communist Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 17:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Imxxd17! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 17:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Plenary Committee of the American Communist Party

The article Plenary Committee of the American Communist Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Recreation of topic just deleted at different AfD: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/American_Communist_Party

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yaksar (let's chat) 02:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Plenary Committee of the American Communist Party

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Plenary Committee of the American Communist Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/American_Communist_Party. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yaksar (let's chat) 02:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please stop. Your persistent attempts to recreate American Communist Party that was deleted following a community discussion at WP:AFD, under that and similar names, is disruptive. If this continues you may have your editing privileges revoked. This should be understood as a Formal Warning. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I never “persistently tried to recreate the said site. I created an article/page that was linked to my draft and thus bears no link to your claim of “disruptive contributions/editing”. I put the time and effort to create those pages with citations. In what way is that disruptive? I didn’t even create that page initially! What was the point of deleting my other page? Imxxd17 (talk) 03:16, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at American Communist Party, you may be blocked from editing. Continuing to recreate American Communist Party against consensus will result in your account being blocked from editing. Home Lander (talk) 00:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Home Lander (talk) 00:11, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am not disrupting. You guys wanted proof of the ACP on secondary media? I gave it to you. But specifically your standards desire the need for media that is biased and fails to actually address what they represent, such as the Guardian, and they do more to belittle and degrade such people than actually analyse what they are doing. Imxxd17 (talk) 00:19, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And you’re seriously deleting the ACP and the PCACP pages for a repost? Did you not see the drastic content increase and source addition on the sites? Did you even take the time to review what I added? Imxxd17 (talk) 00:28, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Haz al-Din for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Haz al-Din is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haz al-Din until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:45, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recreating Deleted Pages

Hi Imxxd17 - I recognize that you are frustrated by the deletion of the American Communist Party article, but if you keep recreating it against consensus it will be seen as disruptive editing and may get your account banned.

I would suggest reading up on Wikipedia's notability guidelines before again creating the page. In short -- it's not about the substance of the article, or anyone's personal thoughts on the topic, but rather the lack of significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. If the party starts to get significant coverage in news sources, books, etc, then it may be worth revisiting, but that does not appear to be the case based on the pages you are continually recreating. Yaksar (let's chat) 23:12, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Frustrated is an understatement- I am totally confused and pissed off as to why not only this page but my other pages are almost immediately getting flagged for speedy deletion. What for? I put time and effort to create the entire code for those articles, trying to improve and add to Wikipedia to the best of my ability, yet Wikipedia administrators can’t seem to wrap that around their head and instantly mark them for deletion. Is this what Wikipedia is now? Why can’t you give the article some time before deleting it? Like 2-3 days. I still managed to have a few secondary sources across the 3 articles, but I cannot understand how the specific information that the person/group says publicly and/or online (primary sources) are regarded as unreliable. Surely Wikipedia and its administration honour the contributions of normal editors? If so, why can’t the least be done by leaving such articles alone even for 1 day before deletion? I find such policies utterly unfair to editors who are trying to fill the information gaps. Imxxd17 (talk) 23:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's being deleted for failing the notability guidelines. It doesn't matter how much blood, sweat and tears you pour into a page -- if the subject isn't discussed at a significant level in independent, reliable sources, it doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards, whether it's a political party, restaurant, rock band, or tech startup. It's not that there isn't verifiable information showing the subject exists (I don't think that part is in question) -- it also has to be notable as shown through independent coverage.

If you want to keep contributing to Wikipedia by creating a page, are there other topics you are interested in that do get notable coverage and lack an article? Perhaps unrelated to political causes and political parties, if that gives more options?--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand if you want to delete other types of pages about organisations, etc, but are you seriously telling me that you need verifiable information (i.e : secondary sources) to agree that Haz al-Din exists? Or do you need a neutral source to speak about his personal views that he’s already mentioned and explained in detail on his own platforms? And by the way, I did put some independent coverage on this page - an entire interview that took up the whole 1st section! Imxxd17 (talk) 23:49, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really familiar with him -- I'm referring to you continually recreating pages for the American Communist Party using alternative titles, and trying to give you a heads up (or warning, if you'd prefer) that continuing to ignore or circumvent guidelines by doing so is going to get you banned.

That being said, I think you are again misunderstanding the requirements for an article. It is NOT about showing verifiable information to prove the subject exists. Otherwise, just about anyone or any subject would have an article. It's about meeting the notability requirements through significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject -- for example, a newspaper, academic textbook, news site generally viewed as reliable, etc. I fully believe that you can provide evidence these subjects exist, but that isn't really an important question here.--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Interviews are, by definition, not independent or secondary, as their content comes from the subject himself even if through another media outlet. Of course, no one is doubting that Haz al-Din exists, but showing that he or his party are notable requires secondary commentary on them. We can't really write an encyclopedic article just from what a person has to say about themselves. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The only ‘secondary commentary’ according to your standards available is biased and disingenuous media like the Guardian that do more to try and defame and belittle their actions rather than address what they follow or stand for. And who would know the party or movement better and what they stand for than the individual(s) themselves? Imxxd17 (talk) 00:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like to work on an article without worrying about it being deleted, you can do so in the draft space. ... discospinster _talk 23:54, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I can't speak for this user, I think they are aware, having created and submitted a draft that was rejected already.--Yaksar (let's chat) 23:57, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Yaksar (let's chat) 01:03, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is unfortunate. Multiple users have tried to advise you on reading up on the notability requirements - continually ignoring all guidance and deliberately breaking the rules to recreate the page without observing the notability requirements is likely going to get you banned.--Yaksar (let's chat) 01:05, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Give me a break. Multiple users who haven’t even taken the time to actually review the changes I’ve made but instead mark it for instant deletion because it’s the consensus of other Wikipedia administrators. I can see why your last edit on wikipedia as a non-administrator was quite a while ago. No-one has any incentive to actually be on this site as an editor if the people who manage what is visible to other people is restricted. I provided substantially more information and more importantly media coverage that shows the party is being represented to an audience. Imxxd17 (talk) 01:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Plenary Committee of the American Communist Party

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Plenary Committee of the American Communist Party requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/American_Communist_Party. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Home Lander (talk) 00:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of American Communist Party (2024)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on American Communist Party (2024) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Communist Party. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Home Lander (talk) 00:10, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Partially blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing new pages for repeatedly recreating deleted pages.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Given that you seem intent on recreating this page despite the deletion discussion ending in a deletion, I've removed your ability to create new pages. If you want to create new pages, make an unblock request that explains our inclusion criteria and how to contest it. Once you do that, any administrator can unblock you without consulting me. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: American Communist Party (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gobonobo was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

An article for the subject was recently deleted at AfD. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Communist Party.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:American Communist Party and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

gobonobo ⁺ ^c 23:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Imxxd17. Thank you. SociusMono1976 (talk) 00:58, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Imxxd17. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:12, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:American Communist Party

Draft:American Communist Party, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:American Communist Party and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:American Communist Party during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Yaksar (let's chat) 16:20, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Imxxd17. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 22:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]