User talk:Igec133

Opinion polling for the next Romanian legislative election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Opinion polling for the next Romanian legislative election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone 20:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Direction – Social Democracy, you may be blocked from editing. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 20:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Heger's Cabinet moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Heger's Cabinet, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aaaahfvk

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Aaaahfvk, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:02, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Opinion polling for the next Slovak parliamentary election

A tag has been placed on Template:Opinion polling for the next Slovak parliamentary election requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

template only used in one article

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster _talk 15:19, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Opinion polling for the next Slovak parliamentary election

Template:Opinion polling for the next Slovak parliamentary election has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ... discospinster _talk 16:40, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Opinion polling for the next Romanian legislative election

Hello, Igec133. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Opinion polling for the next Romanian legislative election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:04, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Citations

Hello Igec, I've noticed your contribution on Voice – Social Democracy, I would recommend you to read WP:HOWCITE since it explains how to add proper citations, not bare links. This would help you and others a lot in the future. --Vacant0 (talk) 18:47, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Opinion polling for the next Romanian legislative election

Hello, Igec133. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Opinion polling for the next Romanian legislative election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, People's Party Our Slovakia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 14:31, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Neo-Nazism is the main ideology in the article and has the most resources. If you are not blind and have basic intelligence, you will understand why this has been changed. --Igec133 (talk) 15:14, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 16:46, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alliance (Slovakia)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Alliance (Slovakia), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
It covers a topic on which we already have an article - Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Romania. (See section A10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Romania, or to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2A01:4C8:A1:F08E:BD9A:CCD7:C7BA:DDA6 (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Alliance (Slovakia)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Alliance (Slovakia). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Romania. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Democratic Alliance of Hungarians in Romania. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Toastskat (talk) 12:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint that you are editing while logged out

Hello Igec133. A user at the edit warring noticeboard has complained that you are editing with both an account and an IP. You can respond if you wish. EdJohnston (talk) 14:56, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

– Igec's reaction: I would like to comment on this.

Regarding the section on IP address and login. I admit, this is happening to me and it is entirely my fault. I don't have automatic login set up, so sometimes I edit not logged in. However, this is not an intention, but an ordinary human error.

As for non-constructive edits. At the National Council, I adjusted its composition and simplified it. I used the official website of the National Council as a source and marked only official parliamentary clubs on the article. In my opinion, this cannot be perceived as an unconstructive edit. The version, which, by the way, had no overall source, I replaced with a version whose source was the official website of the Parliament where its composition was listed.

As for the Next Slovak Elections, I simply pointed out here that only official parliamentary clubs should be in the main template. In Slovakia, the parliamentary club must be approved and it must meet some conditions. If not, party deputies are non-attached. And so they are officially mentioned in the media. At the same time, I would like to point out as an example that even in the template for the German elections, there was no Die Partei, even though it held one seat and was de facto a parliamentary party. And Number57 added non-attached parties there and invented his own abbreviations.

In conclusion, I would like to say that I consider this a normal and ordinary editorial conflict. I would not like to solve it with some blocks and I prefer the debate. I don't find this report fair and I would never do it. But I am willing to defend myself in a cultured way. --Igec133 (talk) 17:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warned per the complaint at WP:AN3 about Slovak elections

Hello Igec133. You've been warned for editing logged out and for edit warring on Slovak politics. You may be blocked if this continues. You should get consensus in your favor on a talk page before reverting again on any articles mentioned in the report such as Next Slovak parliamentary election. The steps of WP:Dispute resolution are open to you. Let me know if you have any questions. EdJohnston (talk) 17:30, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are now continuing the edit war, per a report on my talk page. I do not perceive you have discussed your desired changes anywhere. EdJohnston (talk) 14:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Continued warring at Next Slovak parliamentary election

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Continued warring on 28 October after an 8 October warning at WP:AN3. The details of your reverts were stated on my talk page by User:Number 57. You were told about his complaint (above) but made no response. You have also made no effort to get a talk page consensus for your changes on this article. Judging from your last comment at WP:AN3 you don't feel that the requirement to get consensus applies to you. EdJohnston (talk) 03:55, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Igec133. If you continue to edit war on Slovak politics you are risking an indefinite block. Wikipedia is a group project not a solo venture. EdJohnston (talk) 16:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Přísaha

Hi, can I ask why you moved this article? Sources (English and Czech) routinely refer to this party as Přísaha, so we should too. Jdcooper (talk) 19:24, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Slovak protests moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2018 Slovak protests, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 17:36, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Slovak polls

Why did u reversed my edits to add Polis Braganza (talk) 08:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Slovak Government approval

Template:Slovak Government approval has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:03, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Slovak polls: Development of individual parties

Template:Slovak polls: Development of individual parties has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Slovak polls: Development – government vs. opposition

Template:Slovak polls: Development – government vs. opposition has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Slovak polls – seats

Template:Slovak polls – seats has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 08:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hello, I'm Vif12vf. I noticed that you recently removed content from Direction – Slovak Social Democracy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 23:54, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Direction – Slovak Social Democracy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Vif12vf/Tiberius (talk) 03:08, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2018 Slovak protests

Hello, Igec133. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2018 Slovak protests, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2018 Slovak protests

Hello, Igec133. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2018 Slovak protests".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:21, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Your recent editing history at Direction – Slovak Social Democracy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Schazjmd (talk) 15:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Igec133 reported by User:Schazjmd (Result: ). Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 15:28, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Due to long-term edit warring and disruption at Direction – Slovak Social Democracy. Problems with your editing were explained in the compaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 18:22, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Slovak polls – %

Template:Slovak polls – % has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:20, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Igec133. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:26, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Igec133 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I don't quite understand what happened. My account was blocked and so was my IP. However, the 14-day IP block was supposed to expire today. But I still can't edit. Therefore, I would like to appeal to the block. First of all, I want to say that its educational function was partially fulfilled. I waited two weeks and really had time to think about my mistakes. At the same time, I would like to say that what I was blocked for was not vandalism or abuse. I simply admit that I made a mistake. Yes, I should have looked for consensus more during the edits. Today I realize that's what Wikipedia is about. I should have let the administrator guide me. Regarding block IP for account abuse and sockpuppetry. I didn't know about this at all. In this case, I was not familiar with Wikipedia's policy. Today, however, I know that and I would not act the same way. I know ignorance is no excuse though. But I think my two-week block is over. I cannot judge whether the punishment was adequate. But I know that it fulfilled its educational function, I also already know the policy regarding accounts and I am ready and determined to make edits in consensus with all users. I don't think I'm a threat to Wikipedia, but more and more a benefit. I realize that some of my edits were harmful and I regret it. I am only asking for IP unblocking. I do not think that I have committed such an offense (which was btw unconscious and in good faith) that it was necessary to resort to such a drastic and step. I would consider it an unreasonable use of power and authority. I know that it is necessary to be consistent and to do systematic self-reflection. I do. I admit my mistake. However, I am convinced that the vast majority of my edits were of benefit to Wikipedia, and if you doubt that, I will be happy to show you the results of my work, which I want to continue. For Wikipedia, the largest online free encyclopedia. For a great project.--Igec133(talk) 11:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts; you'll need to address that, and only that in, in any future unblock request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:11, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Igec133 (talk) 14:57, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon: They are now editing as 178.143.106.39 (talk · contribs). Number 5 7 21:50, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

blocked thanks --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 22:50, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cabinet of Eduard Heger

Template:Cabinet of Eduard Heger has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:57, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]