User talk:Idinahui660

December 2024

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres, as you did to Lithium (Evanescence song), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Lapadite (talk) 02:20, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Redneck (song), you may be blocked from editing. Doctorhawkes (talk) 06:17, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's policy against harassment.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 19:49, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Idinahui660 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Contributing with genres, but the other genres presented were unsourced as well, so...You can unblock me after a while, but he pissed me off

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you:
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:13, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Idinahui660 (talk) 15:34, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Idinahui660 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood that I harassed him and I apologise. But @Doctorhawkes made some abuse in removing my useful contributions. Although my genres were unsourced, the genres added in the respective songs that were already added were unsourced as well. :My questions are: :1. Why should I source my genre if the genres already added are unsourced as well? :2. What's the problem in adding unsourced genres into a song with unsourced genres as well? :Thank you Idinahui660 (talk) 4:21 am, Yesterday (UTC−9)

Decline reason:

See NOTTHEM You are not blocked for your genre edits, you are blocked for throwing a two-day long screaming tantrum here on your userpage, riddled with obscenity and eventually hate speech:[1]. You're going to need to adress that directly if you ever want to be unblocked. Also plase make new posts below older posts. El Beeblerino ^{if you're not into the whole brevity thing} 22:56, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|reason=I was too temper. I apologise. I promise not to do the same temperamental issues if you reduce my ban for at least a month or two. }} Idinahui660 (talk) 19:02, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved your unblock request to the bottom of the page. Please post any new requests at the bottom. Thanks. PhilKnight (talk) 19:54, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

*:{{unblock|reason=I apologise. It was nothing but a disrespectful behaviour of mine. I want to reduce my ban at 2 months. That's all.}} Idinahui660 (talk) 20:06, 2 January 2025 (UTC) I've "turned off" these two unblock requests now that the user has been reblocked without talk page access. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 20:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is not a negotiation over the length of the block. If you write a compelling enough request, you can be unblocked right then. What I'm seeing here strikes me as a little too simplistic to expect us to just forget what went on here, including hate speech. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 23:40, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What did you actually see, man? Some complaints? Yeah, a user made some abuse against me. I admit, I insulted him and I apologise. What else do you want?! Idinahui660 (talk) 09:34, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note that this is the same abusive user as TheEagle230. They don't seem competent to edit collaboratively. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 15:35, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Full of crap. Idinahui660 (talk) 18:07, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There does seem to be a behavioral match there, I saw it very quickly. I suppose that one needs a block as well then. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 20:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Given that this user's name Иди на хуй means "go fuck yourself", we're clearly done here. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:24, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.