User talk:Idetestlunarbats

Blocked

I give up. You were warned to stop battling. Your choice of new username is a classic case of disrupting Wikipedia to make a point. Jehochman ^Talk 21:20, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

?

Moonbatssuck (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

You said not to use the word "moonbat" because it could be offensive. At first I dismissed it outright. After reconsideration of your point, I agreed. Some people could take offense because they wouldn't know the context. They would just see the username and think it was an attack on liberals. So I removed "moonbat" completely. I apologized to Ratel for any trouble I caused her. And now you're banning me again? You're the one proving a point!

There is nothing actually offensive about my username and you are banning me because of it. I have a feeling this won't hold up on appeal. --Idetestlunarbats (talk) 21:23, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you chose this as your first username and edited properly, there would have been no issue. Once you started bringing real world battles into Wikipedia, your second chance was to choose a new username and go edit well. This choice of username is indicative of you continuing to want to battle, as is this. That's not acceptable. Jehochman ^Talk 21:28, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Idetestlunarbats (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was told to pick a new user name. I picked this one to clarify that I dislike the fictional lunar bats of the Great Moon Hoax, not liberals. This user name does that and I've been a responsible user thus far. Yet I am being blocked for "baiting" and "disrupting." How am I doing either? You want me to change my original username? That's impossible. You also say that you gave me "second chance." No you didn't. You weren't the one who unblocked me. You told me to create a new name and then blocked me before I could do so.

I put that on my talk page as a joke. How was it offensive or disruptive? Who are you to guess at my "intentions?" I am not battling with you. I don't know why you are blocking me when I'm making constructive edits. If you see an edit that is unfair or wrong, feel free to call me out over it. Until then, take it easy.

Decline reason:

The reference to the original "Moonbat" is obvious, and Jehochman is correct in that your edits are deliberately provocative and not conducive to building a collaborative encyclopedia. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:40, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do not remove declined unblock notices. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 21:44, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was unintentional. I was trying to appeal. I tried to change it back by adding in "reviewed" again but then I was totally blocked from editing. How about Mr. Yalie stops harassing me and let's me just do constructive edits. Judge me on my edits, not my username. --MoonHoaxBat (talk) 21:52, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]