User talk:MoonHoaxBat

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by MuZemike 00:49, 8 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

MoonHoaxBat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a sockpuppet. I was blocked earlier for having two usernames that were not acceptable to an admin. The admin User:Jehochman asked me to create this name and he was opposed past (failed) attempts to block me on this username. The only way to do as this admin requested was to create this name, which he found acceptable. It would be pretty hard for me to be a "sockpuppet" if I acknowledged the former usernames. I could have simply created a new name. I didn't. I came into compliance with the admin's request and the rules of Wikipedia. My names have only been offensive to the Great Moon Hoax's fictional moon-bats and my user page explained this. My current name isn't even offensive to them. I am confident that this mistake will be reversed. I would like an admin to tell me how I can contact Jehochman while blocked, as I believe he (as the original blocker) can provide some valuable context to this discussion. This might also be useful: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks#.22Bad_username.22_blocks--. If this doesn't work, I will file an appeal with the Arbitration Committee because clearly I have been a constructive user under this name, which is inoffensive in the first place. If I was a real sockpuppet, I would just change my IP and create a new name.(talk) 01:15, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Checkuser evidence and similar patterns of disruptive edits have confirmed that you are indeed a sockpuppet of User:Moonbatssuck. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moonbatssuck. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am using this username now. I am documenting this on here so not to be accused of being a sockpuppet.--FredUnavailable (talk) 18:42, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]