User talk:Ichbinbored

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Janicism. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NawlinWiki 16:54, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Janicism. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Daveydw ee b (^chat/_review!) 09:52, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Janicism

Welcome, Ichbinbored! I noticed that you joined the discussion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janicism. Participation in the community is encouraged, of course, but your status as a brand new user means that your opinions might not be counted. Please understand that this is a common practice on Wikipedia, and it is necessary to prevent deliberate misuse of our discussion pages. Our discussion processes value consensus over raw numbers and reasoned debate over simple voting. However, please do make further contributions to Wikipedia and express your opinion on policy matters.

Block notice

Blocked
You have been blocked for one month for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism. EVula // talk // ☯ // 16:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:2differentpeople.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:2differentpeople.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 21:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Riddlesdown and Vandalism

Hello Ichbinbored, you appear to have labelled my edits as vandalism. Please read about what vandalism is and is not. A good faith attempt to cleanup a school article in need of cleanup is not vandalism. I actually removed very little of the history and timeline sections, instead converting most of it, including several one-line sections, to prose. The parts of these sections I removed were mostly highly POV and unverifiable original research. Examples:

"It is widely accepted that the quality of education provided by the Sixth Form is inferior.."
"Much to the disappointment of the school, the most academically able and gifted students tend to leave Riddlesdown..."
"controversy amongst parents who are shocked by the fact that the majority of involvement that their children can have with the Science..."
"students who do not excel in the Sciences are in danger of having the subjects in which they excel overlooked..."
"One theory ... Riddlesdown is trying to improve the rather poor A-Level results by merely admitting only intelligent students..."

Under the verifiability policy I hereby request reliable references for this material.

In your reversion you also restored some spelling and formatting mistakes, but more importantly you also restored some very derogatory remarks about the headmaster and some other completely unencyclopaedic and again unverifiable trivia ("Doctor Dibbs apears to have been assaulted" ?). I intend removing this again as an extreme violation of the NPOV, verifiability, and No original research policies. Perhaps you have no objections to it being removed? Otherwise, perhaps you could provide some independent reliable references. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 19:17, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MFD debate

You may want to comment in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ichbinbored/janicism. MER-C 09:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake

Yeah you were right. The guy who provided the stickers was Crusty, not Heretic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BrutusCirrus (talk • contribs) 22:49, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HAY SUP

=3 Amzi (Talk To Me) 12:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:ShieldRDHS.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:ShieldRDHS.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:ShieldRDHS.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Channel ® 22:58, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Janicefireworks.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Janicefireworks.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 07:44, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]