User talk:Iaroszler1

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; however, please remember the essential rule of respecting copyrights. Edits to Wikipedia, such as your edit to the page Draft:Hyman Klein, may not contain material from copyrighted sources unless that text is available under a suitable free license. It is almost never okay to copy extensive text out of a book or website and paste it into a Wikipedia article with little or no alteration, though you can clearly and briefly quote copyrighted text in the right circumstances. Content that does not comply with this legal rule must be removed. For more information on this, see:

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page and someone will be along to answer it shortly. As you get started, you may find the pages below to be helpful.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! -- Diannaa (talk) 11:22, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hyman Klein (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hyman Klein and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jannatulbaqi (talk) 18:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Iaroszler1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jannatulbaqi (talk) 18:20, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julius Kaplan (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jannatulbaqi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Julius Kaplan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jannatulbaqi (talk) 18:23, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you had joined IRC channel #wikipedia-en-help to ask about his draft. I have a few suggestions, but I can't claim that these issues are the only ones holding up acceptance.

You have a few external links in your body text such as the one for Israel Efros. If you cannot link to Wikipedia articles, these should be left as plain text.

The introductory section of an article is supposed to be a summary of sourced material from the body of the article and, as such does not need its own footnotes. You've supplied a summary statement about an important aspect of Kaplan's career; given it a footnote that I can't easily evaluate, though I do see that Kalmin's article cites Kaplan's monograph. Down below, you have a paragraph under 'Work' that expands somewhat on the summary statement, but reads more as your own editorial conclusions rather than as a set of statements supported by the additional articles that you cite, as a lump, at the end. Perhaps you could parse that out better? It should not read as if you, the humble Wikipedia editor, writing in Wikipedia's voice, express the judgment about what is consensus among scholars. It's also a sign of problems when you pile three or more footnotes onto a single sentence.

The notability criteria that should be considered for Kaplan are probably those at WP:NSCHOLAR, since we would not expect to find general press coverage to support the more common sort of notability. It could be that you can only find enough sources to support the notability of his monograph, but not Kaplan himself. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:26, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was very helpful. Thank you! Iaroszler1 (talk) 03:19, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

It looks like you've been marking some of your edits as 'minor' but they do not meet Wikipedia's criteria for minor edits. Minor edits are marked that way because they should be of zero concern to anyone: obvious spelling and typo corrections, cleaning up things that do not change the appearance of a page, ordering an alphabetical list so it is in alphabetical order.... Adding a citation is never going to be a minor edit.

Misuse of the flag has made it nearly completely useless and my advice to new editors is that they never set the minor edit flag. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:54, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julius Kaplan (Talmud scholar) has been accepted

Julius Kaplan (Talmud scholar), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 14:04, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]