User talk:Hugh16

Welcome!

Hello, Hugh16, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Rjgodoy 04:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Jack F Matlock, Jr.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jack F Matlock, Jr.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:08, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fighting Vandals

Hello, Hugh16! In your recent report to the AIV, you said that you were not sure how to warn or contact the vandals. I am very glad you chose to join the fight against vandals here on Wikipedia. Even though your report was not quite the proper thing to do without warning the person first, it will likely be reviewed and any necessary action will be taken (however I doubt that this will result in a block). This page describes what to do when you spot vandalism. When you gain some basic experience in vandalism-fighting, you might want to try out some of the anti-vandalism tools available for free use (such as Twinkle). If you have any questions about vandalism-fighting, feel free to ask them on my talk page. Thanks. AVand ^talk _contribs 13:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I have now reverted the changes made by the user 202.168.18.153 as they appeared to be vandalism and/or unsourced additions, so the article should be back to normal. AVand ^talk _contribs 13:20, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Avis Howard Thayer

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Avis Howard Thayer, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://oasis.lib.harvard.edu/oasis/deliver/~sch00461. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:33, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Avis Howard Thayer

A tag has been placed on Avis Howard Thayer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. // Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 05:21, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Roger Kirk (diplomat)"

A page you created, Roger Kirk (diplomat), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thanks. BigHairRef | Talk 07:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Flagging Robert E. Hunter for further review

Hello, Hugh16 … I recently encountered the article about Robert E. Hunter and in my opinion, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Biographies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it violates a copyright.

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article, or else a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page … please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Be sure to read Ownership of articles, and remember that Some Other Editors (including at least one administrator) may not share your opinion about the notability of the article's subject.

I do not mean to imply that your contribution is unappreciated … perhaps you should read Your first article … and remember, there was a time when I knew less about how Wikipedia works than you know right now. — triwbe (talk) 07:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Hugh16! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 16 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Leonard S. Unger - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Viron P. Vaky - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Melissa F. Wells - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Robert Pelletreau - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Henry D. Owen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thomas Niles - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Langhorne A. Motley - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Robert Hopkins Miller - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
William H. Luers - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
George W. Landau - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Curtis Warren Kamman 12. Ulric Haynes 13. Brandon Grove 14. Avis Bohlen 15. Reginald Bartholomew

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please check to see if any of these are still unreferenced. I just did Brandon Grove but Wikipedia:Unreferenced BLP Rescue needs your help! Cheers.--Milowent • ^talkblp-r 23:09, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kenneth L. Brown

The article Kenneth L. Brown has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, notability therefore unclear

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 01:38, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:44, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Avis Howard Thayer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Avis Howard Thayer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avis Howard Thayer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 20:49, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hugh16. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]