User talk:Hpushkas318

May 2020

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mary Margaret Blanchard; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:37, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week from certain pages (Mary Margaret Blanchard) for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:39, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marley Rose (Glee) has been accepted

Marley Rose (Glee), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

--TheImaCow (talk • contribs) 08:35, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Marley Rose (Glee) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Marley Rose (Glee), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 17:31, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Marley Rose.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Marley Rose.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 02:26, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elliott Gilbert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glee. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:41, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message and my apologies for any confusion. Hope to get that cleared up ASAP. Also, my sincerest apologies for the late response. Hpushkas318 (talk) 01:51, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marley Rose (Glee), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Voice.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lucifer Morningstar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lucifer Morningstar. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:59, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lucifer Morningstar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lucifer Morningstar. Thanks! Celestina007 (talk) 15:58, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lucifer Morningstar has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lucifer Morningstar. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:46, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucifer Morningstar (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Citations to the episodes are not reliable

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucifer Morningstar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucifer Morningstar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah ^💬 18:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hpushkas318! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noah ^💬 18:03, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hate-watching, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glee.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucifer Morningstar has been accepted

Lucifer Morningstar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 18:43, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for accepting my article for publication. I only wish for nothing but the best and I promise to collaborate more with fellow users if the block is lifted. Hpushkas318 (talk) 01:53, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Screenshot 20230515 014541.png

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot 20230515 014541.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Screenshot 20230515 022539.png

Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot 20230515 022539.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for using unlicensed photographs in my prior drafts. I have remedied this by agreeing only to use licensed photographs in any future drafts or acquiring and affirming licensing status before using the pictures. I promise you this mistake will not be repeated. Hpushkas318 (talk) 01:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your creation of the page Cultural impact of Johnny Depp

Discuss this on the talk page of Johnny Depp and gain consensus. The content you branched off is all duplicated there. You will need consensus for this. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 21:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that my actions were reckless, and I have no excuse for that. Therefore, I take full accountability for what I did, and I promise you it will never happen again. I don't usually make Wikipedia articles that often and still consider myself to be new at this. Therefore, I am still learning the ropes and am in no way an expert. I only decided to take up this task because I enjoyed the challenge. However, given the chaos that I have caused, I think it best to leave the decision of whether or not I will be allowed to edit articles again in your hands for the safety of the website. If you feel that I am a danger, I will more than oblige with that. However, should you change your minds, I can only give you my word that I will engage with other creators more and get their consent before I create a page and take advantage of the fact that Wikipedia is a collaborative community of users. Hpushkas318 (talk) 01:44, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And you recreated it without discussion:[1] This is not good. Again, I strongly suggest you discuss this with other editors at the main page and gain consensus. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 19:18, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do you want to explain why you're engaging in WP:ICANTHEARYOU and WP:RADAR behavior with this[2]? - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 17:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hpushkas318 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for my inability to engage in discourse with other editors. I am not usually a confrontational person and try to avoid conflict. I don't tend to contribute to Wikipedia much, so I'm still learning. However, I will take into consideration the opinions of others before I publish another post and speak with other users about it before doing so. I will seek consent from others and take their opinions into consideration if you decide to lift the block. I understand that my behavior has been disruptive and I am deeply sorry for that. I know that you acted in the way that you did in order to ensure that Wikipedia remains a safe place and to prevent the spread of misinformation. I promise that I will consult with other users in regard to their opinions on what I write, and I will not ignore their opinions.

Decline reason:

The chatbot didn't do you any favors here. This request doesn't address any aspect of why you are blocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 04:06, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hpushkas318 (talk) 02:04, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note According to the edit count tool, this user has never engaged on a talk page. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 18:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My intent to create the page was never done with malice. I had previously created two pages on Wikipedia that were approved and published and hoped to expand my editing skills by tackling a complex topic. I used multiple reliable sources and cited all of them. I intended to discuss the cultural impact of the actor Johnny Depp on our society given that he has remained a topic of conversation that inspired talks about various issues and contributed a lot to the world. Hpushkas318 (talk) 01:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like we're done here, but one thing I'll leave here for the record. If you ever return to Wikipedia, I don't think you should write about Johnny Depp, or anyone else of whom you are such a huge fan. The content you wrote was more appropriate for a fanzine than an encyclopedia. I looked at it and the entire, massive text would have needed to be scrapped and started over. It would have been a lot of work for others. And that would be assuming that the minutia of Depp's career, connections with other celebrities, gushing reviews, etc was even suitable for Wikipedia - which I don't think it is. If you ever return, and since you don't like discussion and collaboration you probably won't, you should not write about celebrities. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 20:30, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Hpushkas318 (talk) 23:45, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:19, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As stated in the block log, the block is for repeated failure to engage with objections (see CV's comments above for examples, with others also apparent in the editing history) and said block can be lifted as soon as Hpushkas318 demonstrates the ability and intent to WP:ENGAGE with other editors as required by policy. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:21, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hpushkas318 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have reviewed the reasons that I have been blocked and I understand that my posting was disruptive. After a great deal of deliberation, I have come to understand that this was, indeed, warranted as my actions were reckless, for which I sincerely apologize to everyone on Wikipedia. I have learned from this experience and have grown to understand that this is a collaborative community meant to spread proper, factual information. From now on, I will consult with others before I make any post, fact-check my sources, learn, and grow from this experience.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:01, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I understand that my failure to respond to objections and engage with others was seen as a sign of bad faith. I assure you that I meant no malice. I was diagnosed as being on the autistic spectrum and I tend to do my best to limit myself and my interactions with others. It is not out of malicious intent. It is because I am a shy person, not out of the fault of anyone else. However, I am working to fix that. Now that you've let me know exactly what the problem is, I can assure you that I will do my best to interact with others on the community and take advantage of potential collaborations. I wanted to write about Johnny Depp's impact on culture because he has had an enormous impact on our culture that cannot be denied through his work and I wanted to highlight, through facts, both good and bad, the ups and downs of Depp's impact on our culture and tried my best to provide an unbiased perspective. However, if you feel that it was not enough, I will gladly revise it. Hpushkas318 (talk) 01:58, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hpushkas318 (talk) 00:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

I just got an email from this new user:

GThompson624 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

They created an account and immediately posted the crap Depp article in their sandbox. They have not engaged on talk anywhere, but wrote me a familiar-sounding email about how, yes, the article Hpushkas318 wrote was a puff piece and could be done better, but it can be salvaged. I'm hearing quacking. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 20:33, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Their manner of speech, particularly with respect to their descriptions Johnny Depp, is a dead ringer. Blocking. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:49, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Good block. - CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 21:12, 2 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@CorbieVreccan @Rosguill New Depp draft just popped up, submitted by an IP. Draft:Cultural impact and reputation of Johnny Depp Qcne (talk) 19:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IPs temp blocked. In the future it may be better to report this to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Hpushkas318 documentation purposes. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're totally right, my bad. Qcne (talk) 12:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]