Jump to content

User talk:Howpper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion nomination of Intrastate

[edit]

Hello Howpper,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Intrastate for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blurred Lines 18:24, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to:"Speedy deletion nomination of Intrastate"

[edit]

Ok. Thanks for letting me know.

November 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Keller, Washington may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Weather box

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:06, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Preston, Idaho may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {{Weather box |imperial first = Y

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:45, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

San Diego clim

[edit]

Don't un-transclude templates without good reason again. Editing the data is not one of them. "My master, Annatar the Great, bids thee welcome!" 01:44, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Intrastate listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Intrastate. Since you had some involvement with the Intrastate redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Imzadi 1979  07:01, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 2 June

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In noticed you've been changing climate data on various articles, but you are not adding a source. What is the source of your data, and why have you not been adding it to your edits? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:11, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use your IP address to revert edits. It's that same IP that edited your sandbox here. What a coincidence. If you continue to add unsourced content, or revert edits using your IP address, I'll report you as a vandal. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:19, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your message on my talk page. When you use the same source please update the date you retrieved the information, so it shows that you actually used a source. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:05, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Dawnseeker2000 17:03, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cable Creek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Zip's Drive-in
added links pointing to Washington, Coeur d'Alene and Tri-Cities
Clark, Washington
added links pointing to Washington and Lake Roosevelt
2015 North American heat wave
added a link pointing to Washington
Rathdrum Prairie
added a link pointing to Coeur d'Alene

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of tallest buildings in Wenatchee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per WP:OUTCOMES cities of this size don't merit stand alone tallest buildings lists

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lewiston-Clarkston metropolitan area, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clarkston. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Howpper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give U.S. Route 85 Business (Williston, North Dakota) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Imzadi 1979  15:40, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:U.S. Route 85 Business (Williston, North Dakota), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Imzadi 1979  15:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I undid your cut n paste move

[edit]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Dish, Texas a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into DISH, Texas. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:55, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same at Inland Northwest (United States). — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:56, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages

[edit]

Hello, Howpper. When you moved Portland metropolitan area to a new title and then changed the old title into a disambiguation page, you may not have been aware of WP:FIXDABLINKS, which says:

When creating disambiguation pages, fix all resulting mis-directed links.
Before moving an article to a qualified name (in order to create a disambiguation page at the base name, to move an existing disambiguation page to that name, or to redirect that name to a disambiguation page), click on What links here to find all of the incoming links. Repair all of those incoming links to use the new article name.

It would be a great help if you would check the other Wikipedia articles that contain links to "Portland metropolitan area" and fix them to take readers to the correct article. Thanks. R'n'B (call me Russ) 11:08, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lincoln (proposed Northwestern state), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mount Adams. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Meters. I noticed that you made a change to an article, List of fastest production cars by acceleration, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Not only does that car not appear to meet the inclusion criteria (production car for public street use, not modified or tuned, etc) but the 11.00 claim is not sourced. Please discuss this on the article's talk page before adding it again. Meters (talk) 21:25, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

[edit]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Moses Lake, Washington, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 20:00, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Seattle metropolitan area, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SounderBruce 17:26, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Behemoth's World

[edit]

Hello, Howpper,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Behemoth's World should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behemoth's World .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Mduvekot (talk) 12:25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Howpper. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent edit to this article. However, you do not appear to have supplied a reference source for the death details. Is this forthcoming ?

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 13:54, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I have now added a source that I found myself. Please bear in mind the need for references in all such cases in the future. I have lost count of the number of editors who have tried to post bogus death notices on Wikipedia over the past decade and more ! Thank you,
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 19:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue Öyster Cult, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Take Me Away (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of tallest buildings in the Tri-Cities has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTDIR. The entries would not be notable enough for their own articles, and the list itself is little more than a WP:SYNTH of database lists. There's no secondary coverage, especially locally, and it's rarely discussed at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SounderBruce 05:07, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra, New Zealand

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at Alexandra, New Zealand, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.-gadfium 18:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Smallest asteroid listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smallest asteroid. Since you had some involvement with the Smallest asteroid redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

[edit]

Are you aware of Cascadia Wikimedians User Group? We usually meet in Seattle, but if there's an Eastern Washington contingent who would like to participate, maybe we could arrange a Hangouts session or even meet in the middle at some future date? ☆ Bri (talk) 02:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greenacres Middle School moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Greenacres Middle School, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. PLEASE NOTE: Middle Schools rarely meet our criteria for inclusion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:34, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Zzzoom. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Todd Rogers (video game player) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks.


A tag has been placed on Fraud Rogers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheSandDoctor Talk 06:00, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lewiston-Clarkston metropolitan area, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Lewiston and Clarkston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Akanthos of Sparta and the diaulos

[edit]

What is your source for Akanthos winning the diaulos? Both Eusebius and Beale say that he won the dolichos, but I cannot find any source for his victory in the diaulos... Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 21:36, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Caeciliusinhorto: I reverted my edit, I was just confused somehow. Howpper

A tag has been placed on Hellgate Canyon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Seraphim System (talk) 08:57, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spokane-Coeur d'Alene Combined Statistical Area, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coeur d'Alene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

85B

[edit]

Just thought I'd ask: Is there another U.S. 85B other than this one? If not, then I'd be happy to move it from the identifier. ToThAc (talk) 15:26, 15 April 2018 (UTC) @ToThAc: No, there isn't another highway named U.S. 85B. I would really appreciate it if you could move the page. Thanks, Howpper 20:03, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

50 metres (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Maurice Greene
60 metres (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Maurice Greene

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Metallica, you may be blocked from editing. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 04:44, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my closing statement at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2018 May 2#IDubbbzTV regarding the best method for getting the creation protection from IDubbbzTV removed. Steel1943 (talk) 16:28, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 16:28, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Lookout Mountain. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 16:36, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As with the previous editor, I posted this as you seem to have issues with page moves, specifically the move of Lookout Mountain to Lookout Mountain (Walker County, Georgia). Please discuss such moves in the future. Thanks. - BilCat (talk)

Lookout Mountain (Walker County, Georgia) listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lookout Mountain (Walker County, Georgia). Since you had some involvement with the Lookout Mountain (Walker County, Georgia) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:59, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

U.S. Route 85B (Williams County, North Dakota)

[edit]

I gave a reason when I moved it back, which is the naming convention at WP:USSH. That convention specifies that special and suffixed routes get their locations in their names, even if otherwise unique. USSH came about after the end of a VERY contentious page move war over a decade ago, and the convention was the result of an ArbCom case. In short, changing USSH or going against it is the third rail of USRD, and yes, we use disambiguation terms even when titles would be unique without them (which is why the article is at "M-185 (Michigan highway)" instead of just "M-185"). Imzadi 1979  01:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article List of tallest buildings in Wenatchee, Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Almost entirely unsourced article for a city of 33K; has exactly one building that has an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 05:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kansas City, Kansas

[edit]

Hey Howpper, I noticed you added Kansas City, Kansas to the vital article level 5 list. Maybe you did this by mistake? Kansas City, Missouri is already listed and Kansas City, Kansas is a suburb of that. It doesn't seem to match the rest of the cities on the list which are either large central cities or state capitols. I can go ahead a remove it but I wanted to check first. Thanks. Grey Wanderer (talk) 00:38, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've responded over at my talk page to keep the conversation together. Grey Wanderer (talk) 23:49, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be reverting and cleaning up your edits to the exit list over the next few days. For future reference, the Destinations column should only list what is actually on the signs (as seen in Google Street View or WSDOT SRweb), even if they omit cross-streets. Adding names from Google Maps (which are not always accurate) is borderline WP:OR, so I'd rather see it left off the page. SounderBruce 03:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tallest buildings in Wenatchee, Washington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tallest buildings in Wenatchee, Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SounderBruce 04:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Foo Fighters. 4TheWynne(talk)(contribs) 05:47, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at RiceGum, you may be blocked from editing. As I said in the edit summary, combining 100 and Bubbling Under peaks violates WP:SYNTH. Read WP:USCHARTS; it states this already. Songs don't re-enter the Bubbling Under chart if they fall out of the Hot 100, therefore number one on the Bubbling Under chart is not necessarily 101, so it's misleading to claim it is. This is why the guideline exists. Ss112 05:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue Öyster Cult discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CMC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  5 albert square (talk) 16:38, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bazzi songs has been nominated for discussion

[edit]

Category:Bazzi songs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:16, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see you moved, without any form of discussion, the article I created eleven years ago. Never before has anyone seriously questioned the title. Discussion before such a controversial move would have been IS the right thing to do. The only question about terminology, and clarification, offered is found in the archives here. Read the last sentence.

You may not realize this, but in Greenland the deer are only referred to as "rensdyr" (reindeer). English and scientific literature tries to translate from Danish, but since there are two words in English, they often get confused and don't consistently use the "right" words in the "right" places, pretty much like English speakers also do. It really depends on whether it's a North American or someone from somewhere else who does the writing. Therefore you're placing far too much weight on a dubious distinction in words. I suspect it's possible to find articles and scientific literature which could be used to bolster each view. I chose the term used in Greenland, since it's about Greenland, and nowhere else. We shouldn't use North American terms and distinctions, unless referring to North American conditions and animals in North America.

Only in North America is there some sense of consistent usage of the two words. Otherwise, everything east of Canada (from Greenland, to Norway, Finland, Russia, and Siberia) are ALL reindeer. All of the ones we hunted in SW Greenland (there are almost no others in the country) were reindeer (there isn't much difference genetically). Nearly all the naturally occurring deer died out and the ones brought from Norway have interbred with the few remaining. Just sayin'...

I've shot 16, and there could be slight differences between animals shot one mile apart. Most of the ones I shot had wet snouts, just like cows.

To top it off, according to the Danes, Santa's Reindeer (not caribou) come from Greenland, and I shot Rudolph in 1990, as the third out of four deer that day. All sightings since then are of imposters. (I know, I know, you don't have to say it.... Santa actually lives at the North Pole (out on the ocean ice), so he must get his reindeer from Greenland, the nearest source of the animals. He also uses his office in Nuuk, the capital of Greenland, where he answers all those letters from children. The mailbox there is huge. )

Anyway, something to think about. We don't just move articles here without discussion. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 05:14, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2015 North American heat wave for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2015 North American heat wave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2015 North American heat wave until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 08:28, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give King of the Dead a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into King of the Dead (disambiguation). This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. —Ketil Trout (<><!) 07:23, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stateline, Idaho, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coeur d'Alene (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Howpper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Genre warring at New York Dolls articles

[edit]

Your revision to the album articles was inappropriate; McNair in The Independent does not refer to either album as "glam punk", only to the band's music at the time of their inception in 1971; a necessary distinction to make when articles are vulnerable to opinion-based genre changes ("more accurate genre"). At New York Dolls, you simply ref-bombed the infobox to give the impression a point-of-view you favor outweighs any opposing views. The Guardian blurb you cited does not even mention "glam punk". I've added a quote from McNair to #Musical style, so it verifies "glam punk", which was already in the infobox. This should suffice. Moreover, there is substantial discussion among sources in the musical style section disputing the view the band were either glam or punk. Dan56 (talk) 18:13, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If in doubt, use Citation needed tag rather than reverting

[edit]

You reverted the edit I had made stating Kongos (band) are South African American. Since most edits improve articles, and are made in good faith, people find it inflammatory to have their edits reverted. Therefore, you should be quite sure that something is wrong before reverting it. In this instance, where you doubted something, but apparently didn't know for sure, I would suggest using the Wikipedia:Citation_needed needed tag. Here's some more guidance on editing: Wikipedia:Editing_policy#Adding_information_to_Wikipedia

In the meantime, I have added a source that mentions the Kongos brothers were raised in SA but now live in Phoenix, AZ. Paulgush (talk) 01:48, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black Blade (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heavy metal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Bazzi Mine.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bazzi Mine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About this...

[edit]

My apologies for hasty editing. Robvanvee 13:28, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:00, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spokane Valley–Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twin Lakes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 US Banknote Contest

[edit]
US Banknote Contest
November-December 2019

There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons.

In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate.


If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox creation

[edit]

Hello Howpper, i was wondering if you knew any information about the Unincorporated community of Green Bluff, Washington Northeast of Spokane that i could implement into an infobox that i am creating for the article. Thank you for your time.AgentNed (talk) 09:29, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Possible attack of cyber bullying on Joe Exotic wiki page

[edit]

Hi. I am an inactive user on Wikipedia, but with the recent success of Tiger King on Netflix, I was looking at the wiki for Joe Exotic, and I was shocked to see my name posted as one of Joe Exotic's children (Brandon Chappell). I can assure you that I have NO relation to Joe Exotic, but I can tell you that I have been bullied in the past by some not so pleasant people. Upon looking at the edit history, the edit made by User.Rovingrobert, added my name in the infobox as one of his children. As far as I know, Joe Exotic NEVER had any children, and given Rovingrobert's history of bullying on this wiki, he would have his administrator privileges revoked IMMEDIATELY! This hass really hit me hard, and I am utterly embarrassed by this. Could you please remove my name from the infobox and place a lock on the page? Thanks! Brandon (talk) 15:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Witch's Game.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Witch's Game.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minor civil division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magisterial district (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hole Patrol for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hole Patrol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hole Patrol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:45, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Metal Shop.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Metal Shop.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Metal Skool.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Metal Skool.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dancin' in the Ruins.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dancin' in the Ruins.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:In Thee (single).png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:In Thee (single).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Take Me Away.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Take Me Away.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Climate data

[edit]

Your talk page is filled with warnings but not so much appreciation of all the hard work youve done. I just wanted to thank you for coming back day after to day to work on such a thankless task. Specifically regarding climate editing, I'm glad that you've been using the Desert Research Institute instead of corrupt sources like Weatherbase. I wish everyone did that.

Even so, I did also come to let you know that I took away some of the climate table you wrote, because a three-year period of record is much too short to derive meaningful data from the temperature extremes. Let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards, Soap 23:00, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Picture request

[edit]

Hey Howpper! Just want to start off by saying thanks for your great contributions to the website in writing content and adding media. I especially like how you have snapped a lot of pictures to be used to illustrate the articles, the Spokane area related ones in particular. They really bring the articles to life and make you feel like you’re there.

Need updated photo of campus: The treed area to the right in the scene has had the significant addition of a 100-bed psychiatric hospital and a hotel (construction crane visible)

I wanted to message you today to request another photo though, a new picture of the Sacred Heart campus from the same vantage point that you shot File:Sacred Heart Hospital.jpg since the scene has changed a lot since the time you took that photo in 2017. A psychiatric hospital, INBH was constructed at 5th and Browne in 2018 (which has no photo in the Commons yet) and a Hampton Inn primarily to serve people visiting the hospital was put in on McClellan further up above it on the lower South Hill (you can see the cranes in place to build it in that 2017 photo). I like the vantage point you used, shooting up Browne and with the elevated highway in the foreground. You can see most of the campus and it interesting how the hospital seems to gobble up Browne Street with that tunnel. I was considering retaking the photo myself but I couldn’t figure out where you took it lol. If you don’t have the time or aren’t interested, I could take it if you share the location.

Thank you! 2001:5B0:4FD3:F0B8:4DBF:E61E:73E9:7FA7 (talk) 15:27, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Long overdue, but according to the EXIF data in that file, the photo was taken from this location (Google Maps). This appears to be eastbound I-90 at exit 281. I suspect Howpper was the passenger in a vehicle and shot the photo through their window. Alternatively, I suppose you could attempt to stop in the gore point between the interstate and the exit ramp to take a photo. Google Earth shows that you might be able to get a similar angle from the rooftop of the DoubleTree down by the Spokane River, but you'd need a fairly strong zoom to pull it off (a 70-200mm might work). A shot from street level would probably be heavily obscured by the freeway (if shot from the north side of I-90) or possibly too low (if shot from the south side of I-90). A drone shot might be possible, but because of airspace restrictions you need to be part 107 certified (commercial UAS operations) and it requires advance coordination to take off. If I can get certified by summer I might attempt to take a better shot. —Locke Coletc 06:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Witch's Game.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Witch's Game.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 26 § Category:Wikipedia XX-Class level-n vital articles on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 14:47, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]