User talk:Honesthao
Honesthao, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]@Materialscientist: Aren't we allowed to remove ProD's w/o explanation. It should not have been retagged for ProD. (Not that I agree with that.) Now at AfD-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 13:07, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
|
Hi Honesthao! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 28 December 2018 (UTC) |
The article Manifold Vector Machine has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to be original research, published only in the article creator's blog. A Google Scholar search reveals no mention of this in any published paper.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 01:11, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
January 2019
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Manifold Vector Machine. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rekonedth (talk) 11:22, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Manifold Vector Machine, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Rekonedth (talk) 11:41, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Please stop removing maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Manifold Vector Machine, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Rekonedth (talk) 11:45, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Manifold Vector Machine. Rekonedth (talk) 11:47, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 12:06, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Manifold Vector Machine for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manifold Vector Machine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manifold Vector Machine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Balkywrest (talk) 12:14, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Honesthao (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
(1) My page was been attacked abusively by Rekonedth. As a new user, I'm not sure of other options; (2) Regarding to reliability, I referenced what is relevant.
Decline reason:
It is not true that your page was abusively attacked by Rekonedth. In fact, it was you who was being abusive. The deletion notice clearly indicates it must not be removed, but you persisted in removing it. The block was therefore necessary to protect Wikipedia against your attempts to harm it. Yamla (talk) 13:19, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
It was pointed out to me that I'm mistaken in my unblock decline here. The deletion notice currently at that article indicates that it must not be removed, but that's not what you removed. You removed an earlier version, where it specifically is okay. My apologies. I do not choose to override your block, but the above unblock decline is not accurate. "The deletion notice clearly indicates it must not be removed, but you persisted in removing it" is specifically incorrect. My apologies for that. --Yamla (talk) 01:31, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
@Yamla: No worries, apology accepted, have a nice day. Honesthao (talk) 11:30, 3 January 2019 (UTC)