User talk:HoHighlights

May 2020

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to User:HoHighlights/sandbox. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. JBW (talk) 23:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. I have no desire to make this Wikipedia page promotional and advertorial in nature. There is no page that exists explaining what House of Highlights is and it is a huge media brand and notable company. I was referencing the pages of similar media brands like "Complex Networks (Media)" -- and even the page of the individual previously associated with House of Highlights media brand Omar Raja -- to try and ensure I was following examples of similar pages that had been approved on Wiki and avoid anything advertorial in nature without neglecting key parts of the brand description (platforms it lives on, followers, content) or history (founder, milestones, acquisition, etc). I will go back through the copy and ensure any descriptions are clearly objective and substantiated by 3rd-party sources. Honestly, I was still work-shopping this and revising before submitting for review(adding links, etc.). Is there any additional feedback that you can provide so I don't trigger anything editors feel is advertorial? HoHighlights (talk) 01:34, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

House of Highlights moved to draftspace

Based on your username and your comments above, it appears that you have a conflict of interest with House of Highlights. Please disclose your COI, as well as whether you have been paid to make edits, on your user page as well as the talk pages of any affected articles, as explained at WP:DCOI. Editors with conflicts of interest are strongly suggested to submit new articles through the Articles for creation process. To this end, I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:28, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COI username notice

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "HoHighlights", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username, by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:40, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: House of Highlights (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Recently moved from mainspace back to draft for being promotional and needing better sourcing outside the company.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:House of Highlights and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:House of Highlights, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HoHighlights! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:43, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Attention needed at username change request

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 14:51, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: House of Highlights has been accepted

House of Highlights, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SMB9 9thx my edits! 09:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]