Jump to content

User talk:Hitch2413

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Hitch2413! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 12:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC) Thank you so much for your kind words. I will try my best to edit the articles and follow all the guidelines. I would surely be happy if a senior editor adopts me. In this way, I can learn a lot of things. I will surely look into it. Thank you.Hitch2413 (talk) 14:55, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

January 2021

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Digital District, from its old location at User:Hitch2413/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs 15:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello Hitch2413. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Hitch2413. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Hitch2413|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SK2242 (talk) 06:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SK2242, firstly thank you for explaining in detail what Wikipedia expects about its articles. I have to admit that this was the very first article I was working on, but also that I am in no means or ways getting paid to write it. There is absolutely no COI here. I just want to write about VFX companies and the interesting projects that they have worked on because not many are known to the public and it will be interesting to have it on Wikipedia. My principal source is IMDB (which I think is reliable) but I agree forgot to link it in the article. I will improve the article and if possible you can help me check it again.Also, I have read the rules for citations and references I will be modifying it too.Thank you. Have a nice day. Hitch2413 (talk) 14:34, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for replying, but just wanted to note that iMDB is an unreliable source (see WP:IMDB for more details). SK2242 (talk) 14:45, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thank you for the list. I will be including the sources which are acceptable by wikipedia. Hitch2413 (talk) 15:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Digital District has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Digital District. Thanks! SK2242 (talk) 06:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital District (February 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MarioJump83 were:
MarioJump83! 12:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Hitch2413! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarioJump83! 12:54, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital District (February 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 00:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital District (April 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 13:45, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital District (May 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Whispering were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Whispering(t) 20:15, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital District (September 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Krishnavilasom Bhageerathan Pilla was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 18:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]