User talk:Hdepot

License tagging for File:Above parispaint2002thumb.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Above parispaint2002thumb.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Above parispaint2002.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Above parispaint2002.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Above train2003 thumb.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Above train2003 thumb.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Above train2003.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Above train2003.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Above paris2002thumb.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Above paris2002thumb.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Above paris2002.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Above paris2002.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:07, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Above parispaint2002.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Above parispaint2002.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. B (talk) 19:25, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Above berlinwall1.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Above berlinwall1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 04:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:EASTER AIG FULL SPREAD.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:EASTER AIG FULL SPREAD.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 04:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Above naked truth horizontal web.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Above naked truth horizontal web.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk 04:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple Issues with article Above

Hi, just to inform you that I have added a multiple issues tag to this article containing a significant number of issues. The reason for each item being added is discussed in the talk page. In summary, I feel the article is now overly long, very rambling, not written in an objective, encyclopedic manner and contains far, far to many lengthy quotes from the artist himself making up a substantial amount of the article. I think that the article needs to be pared down massively for now, what is there taken to a user page (I am writing this here because I note you have almost exclusively edited this page in the last year or so) and worked on. If there is not a significant change in the articles tone, content, references and structure in a reasonable time period, then I feel this is an article that would have to be put forward for deletion on the grounds of its overly promotional tone. Fenix down (talk) 10:34, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

Hello Hdepot. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Above (artist), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 11:31, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Passport Book Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Passport Book Cover.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. /ƒETCH COMMS / 00:19, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Special 1 72.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Special 1 72.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:07, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Passport_above_cover_image.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Passport_above_cover_image.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 12:33, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Above

Hello. Your edit history shows that you are a Single-purpose account, since all of your edits have been about Above (artist). That's not necessarily a bad thing, but some of your edits have been pretty heavily promotional (this:[1] being an example of what I mean). Maybe you already know all of this, but if you are connected to Above, you might have a conflict of interest, and you need to read this: WP:COI. If you are just an admirer, you should probably read WP:NOTADVOCATE, if you haven't already. Grayfell (talk) 04:09, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Artist, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page OBEY (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013

Hello, I'm Grayfell. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Above (artist) because it appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 21:59, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Above Promotion

I admire your enthusiasm. The article needs a lot of work, it should not be a catalog of every single thing the artist has done. I'm trying to go through and pair down to essentials and noteworthy pieces. Adding a ton of details is only making it harder to tell which parts are really important. Adding links to a bunch of videos and an ad for a book is never acceptable. Grayfell (talk) 22:26, 6 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

EL

Please familiarize yourself with external link guidelines. It is very very rare that you should be adding external links to pages. Your edits are still FAR too promotional, and this isn't helping. Grayfell (talk) 00:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thank you Grayfell for you support and modifications. Your revisions look stronger and more refined. I will try to tone down my links and enthusiasm for this artist in the wikipedia page.

No prob. Using external links is fine inside ref tags, or in talk pages, but in the article it's usually not okay.

Having some examples of what he does is great, but the article makes everything he does look exactly the same. All the examples are given the same amount of space, and explained in the same level of detail. I don't think that's very flattering to him, honestly. If you can figure out some of the bits-and-pieces that aren't critically important for understanding the artist, and remove them, that would be a huge improvement to the article.

If the only source talking about a piece that Above did is from Above himself than he better be saying "This is one of the most important pieces I have done" or something like that, because otherwise, it doesn't deserve more than a single sentence, (if that). This is NOT a catalog of every piece he's done. If it's not important to other people, and it's not important to Above, why is it in the article?

You might want to look over some of the article on this list:Wikipedia:Good_articles/Art_and_architecture#Art These are all articles that are especially good. Most of the artists on this list who have been making art for as long as Above, like Olek (very, very different artist, but been active for about as long) have articles much smaller than Above's. Figuring out what belongs in an article is difficult until after some time has passed.

Also, I am following your talk page, so you can respond here, and I will see it. Or, of course at Talk:Above (artist) and a lot more people who are interested will see it.Grayfell (talk) 06:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very kindly Grayfell for your words of wisdom. Your revisions really are wonderful and appreciated. As a fan of this artist and others I try to inform on their respective artworks. I will continue to finish the artist's key and notable doing for 2012. (small text about his solo exhibition in Melbourne, but mostly focus on his #socialmedia piece in Denmark and the artist's painting in Spain about the global economy.) I feel these are important to discuss in his 2012 archive. After these are added all we need to do is wait until the end of 2013 for updating his wikipedia page. Thank you again for making his and other artist pages refined and spectacular. -Carter.

You're welcome. I don't think the #socialmedia video belongs as a separate link, but I'm not sure, since the paragraph is about the video itself, rather than a video of a separate installation. (Personally I think the video is extremely cool, and yes, I admit it, I did share it on Facebook.) I'm going to poke around the Manual of style and see what it says about video links like that. It's not a situation I've dealt with before. Grayfell (talk) 03:07, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I looked into the video link issue, but didn't find anything. I think the best comparison would be a rock band and a music video. Even when a section is specifically about a music video, links to the actual video are (as far as I can tell) never included in the article. That's not really a Wikipedia policy, but it seems like a good indicator of how things go. Grayfell (talk) 03:44, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 29 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Above (artist) page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:31, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Above (artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portland. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Above (artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Overlapping. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:00, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Above (artist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blood Diamond. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hdepot. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Above Haiti 1.jpg

The file File:Above Haiti 1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

probably copyrighted 2D art

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:37, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hdepot. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hdepot. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:HNH XTRA LARGE.jpg

The file File:HNH XTRA LARGE.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused image of someone else's art, free use claim unlikely to be valid

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:49, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:AboveLefthanders.jpg

The file File:AboveLefthanders.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

File:Word 16.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tavar Zawacki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Site-specific (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABOVElove.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ABOVElove.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hi Hdepot! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Tavar Zawacki that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:18, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]