User talk:Harshalhayat

Systems_science

Hi I read your comment on https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Portal_talk:Systems_science

I'm working in the European Institute for Innovation and Technology community - a body of the European Commission - on the 17#GlobalGoals for Sustainable Development SDG's. We are looking for a scientific methodology describing when to bring in what partner to contribute in solving a problem. The problem is that these 17#GlobalGoals are all interconnected, and behind every goal there is a large number of stakeholders. There is a risk and tendency to keep everybody informed all the time on everything, leading to disturbing everybody, all the time, everywhere and people not getting any work done anymore. As in Epposi, you have so many stakeholder groups: patients, health industry, government, ..., and human health being such a complex matter - where to look first, which specialists to bring in to analyse the problem, and then cure - you must have come across such situations too.Can you ask your members if they come across or use a scientific methodology describing when to bring in what partner to contribute in solving a problem.I imagine it would be some tool where you can bring in a data set of : these are all the issues and sub-issues, these are all the groups and the issues/sub-issues they have relevant knowledge about, this is the solution strategy path, and then the methodology shows which people to bring in when.Sounds much like gantt charting. But I'm not sure if Gantt charting methodology can be made so that it automates who to put when. That's up to the human making the chart to do, right? Thy for reading and considering. --SvenAERTS (talk) 04:51, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm Srich32977. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Business cycle because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! – S. Rich (talk) 13:42, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Harshalhayat. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Harshalhayat~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

00:29, 20 March 2015 (UTC)