User talk:HarryM54321

January 2017

Please don't change the format of dates, as you did to Nickelodeon Animation Studio. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. JudgeRM (talk to me) 17:55, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Despite the quite valid request above, I see that you went ahead and changed the format at List of Rugrats episodes. Please do not do so again. --AussieLegend (✉) 18:37, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to The Ren & Stimpy Show (season 5). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AussieLegend (✉) 18:43, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Ren & Stimpy Show (season 5). AussieLegend (✉) 18:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability, reliable sources, and consensus

Please read the summary of the Wikipedia policies Verifiability, Reliable Sources, and Consensus. In short, make sure information you add or alter is cited to reliable sources, and if your edits keep getting reverted you need to use the article talk page to discuss the edits and achieve consensus. Your current editing appears to be vandalism because you do not follow these policies. BrightRoundCircle (talk) 19:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. BrightRoundCircle (talk) 19:28, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See the report about you at: WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:HarryM54321 reported by User:BrightRoundCircle (Result: Blocked). Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 03:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]