User talk:Hannahxo
Welcome!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/8/80/Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg/50px-Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg.png)
Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
|
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
Your edits on Jenna Marbles
[edit]Hello, please refrain from edit warring. "Higher quality" is objective, whereas "better looking" is subjective. When available, higher quality images should obviously be used on articles. Here, you have a professional photograph against a blurry/compressed YouTube video screenshot. The choice should be clear. If you still disagree, instead of reverting, you can seek consensus for your edit on the article's talk page. Thank you. Throast (talk) 10:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
June 2021
[edit] Hello, I'm Ken Tony. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Christina Grimmie, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ken Tony Shall we discuss? 17:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
It was clearly cited in the infobox with the subscriber number. I believe this is a wrong revert. Hannahxo (talk) 17:37, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
I'm removing my warning; don't worry about the edit on Camila Morrone. That revert was because the diff showed up incorrectly for me. Your edit's fine. Have a good one here! jp×g 10:38, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you so much JPxG :) Hannahxo (talk) 10:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
You have ignored the KSI talk page discussion and continue to make inaccurate reverts, this is your warning before report
[edit]![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ChicagoWikiEditor (talk) 18:13, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:33, 22 June 2021 (UTC)![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
Hannahxo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'll be honest, yes i know i have used multiple accounts but they were never with ill intent or for vandalism. All the edits i have ever made are just trying to improve an article. My problem was that i constantly got into conflicts with other editors and got my accounts banned because of it and kept making a new one to keep editing. I hope one of my accounts will get unbanned after looking at my history, if not that's fine and i understand. Thank you. Hannahxo (talk) 16:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Each time you make a new account in order to get around a block, you are doing so with ill intent. In fact, you've been so abusive that your original account is now globally locked. It will be very hard for you to come back from this. Your best hope is to follow WP:SO which requires at least six months with zero edits. Even then, you'll need to show substantially more understanding of how disruptive you've been. Yamla (talk) 16:25, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.