User talk:Hadjnix

This is Hadjnix's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Rodoljupci moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rodoljupci. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Azarctic (talk) 00:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Daniel Haqiqatjou, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iranian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:The 100 most prominent Serbs according to a committee of academicians at the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts has been nominated for deletion

Category:The 100 most prominent Serbs according to a committee of academicians at the Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 00:10, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Austrian legislative election

Hello. I don't understand why you only added swings to the results table for five of the twelve parties. Could you add the remaining seven so the rest of the column is not empty? Thanks, Number 5 7 19:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hi. I didnt have time. I added the rest Hadjnix 13:42, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello, I'm AkiyamaKana. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Islam seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. AkiyamaKana (talk) 13:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Strahinja Janjić (October 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Strahinja Janjić and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hadjnix! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User report to personal talk page. Thank you.CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Islam) for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 11:59, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a false warning and it has been made to scare me. I've tested that I am still able to edit on Wikipedia. Hadjnix 12:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sure you can. Even Talk:Islam. But not Islam. Doug Weller talk 16:16, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Birthdate incorrect on Dennis Assanis?

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Dennis_Assanis Born 1967 and BA 1980, MAs in 1982, PhD in 1985? Would have been 13, 15 and 18 years old respectively. This is the date that has been in the entry since 2016, but it can't be right. BD comes up on aggregator sites as Feb 1959. 108.52.214.85 (talk) 20:23, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I appreciate that you’ve found errors in the article. However, I did not put that birth date. You can freely correct the birth date if you want. Hadjnix 20:32, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I/P restriction notification

Since it is not clear whether you have been made aware of this:

Your unilateral addition to Kamala Harris/FAQ—which you should not have made without consensus or any prior discussion regardless—is clearly a violation of the I/P extended confirmed restriction as such. Please be aware of this going forward. Remsense ‥ 论 06:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prior accounts

Hi Hadjnix. Could you confirm if you have any relation to User:Fournineo, User:Some random serbian, or User:Aca1291? -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 12:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Hadjnix 12:21, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You should appeal your block as Aca1291, they apply to the editor not the account. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 12:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t have issues with being blocked from editing Islam but ok. Hadjnix 13:04, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You misunderstand as long as the Aca1291 account is blocked you should not be editing at all. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested «@» °∆t° 13:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, that's not true. Hadjnix 14:27, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are incorrect. What you are doing is WP:SOCK. I have blocked this account. Please log in to your original account to appeal. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:55, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My older accounts are inactive, I don't have access to them anymore which is why I made this one. Hadjnix 15:40, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your older account is blocked. You should not have made this account at all. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:24, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made it at Serbian Wikipedia, and forgot about Aca1291 being blocked on English Wikipedia until now. Hadjnix 17:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're blocked then any editing outside what your block allows is considered block evasion regardless of what you remember. But in any case, now that you're aware of your block again, any editing would be block evasion even by your own definition. So you need to remain blocked until you successfully appeal you earlier block/s. Nil Einne (talk) 16:03, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As to how to appeal the block see WP:Guide to appealing blocks and WP:Standard offer. At a minimum when appealing your block you should list all your older accounts and you will need to carefully consider how you went wrong with your older account/s as well as with this one and explain how you will avoid that in the future. Noting that in this case you managed to get partially blocked before anyone even connected you demonstrating that there are continued problems with your editing even putting aside the block evasion. In addition the fact you edited here and even when reminded of your block didn't seem to understand why you should not be editing IMO means it's fairly likely you'll be treated as a sockpuppet regardless or what you may have forgotten. We ultimately have no way to know if you really did forget about your blocks or just thought you could escape them. This means you should also wait at least 6 months from now before appealing a block. To be clear, any editing by any account or IP on the English wikipedia other than to your talk page will reset that 6 months no matter what you may forget. So make sure you remember that your are blocked and cannot edit until you successfully appeal. Nil Einne (talk) 16:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. UtherSRG (talk) 14:53, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hadjnix (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

It ain’t a sockpuppet because the intention of this account wasn’t to break the rules of Wikipedia but because I lost access to my older accounts so I made this one instead.

Decline reason:

Okay, that's not a "sockpuppet" in the "pretending to be different people" sense, but it's still very much a problem in the "block evasion" sense. You were blocked for disruptive edits and personal attacks against people and groups. It looks like you've continued those attacks onto this account and been blocked for it: [1]. That was less than a month ago. -- asilvering (talk) 21:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hadjnix 15:41, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not in the block evasion sense because I forgot that my old account was blocked on Wikipedia when I made this one. Hadjnix 21:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Aca1291 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Aca1291. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 23:36, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]