This is an archive of past discussions with User:HC7. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Hey there. There's a discussion on the WWE personnel talk page that could use more editors weighing in if you'd like to do so. Thanks! Happy End of February! DantODB (talk) 06:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
WXW Ultimate Hybrid Championship
The WXW Ultimate Hybride Championship is not contested in the German promotion Westside Xtreme Wrestling. It is contested in World Xtreme Wrestling. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it!22:00, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Also, we need more sources outside of Cagematch. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 03:46, 15 May 2017 (UTC
$uicideboy$ request
I deleted your request on the $uicideboy$ talk page, as this was the wrong place for it. If you would like the protection removed, please go to WP:RFUP and post a request there to have the protection removed from the page. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve $uicide boy$
Hi, I'm Robertgombos. HC7, thanks for creating $uicide boy$!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.Could you add some more references to your article? Thanks!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Kay Lee Ray for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Suicide boys for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
A request has been filed for the title of Suicide boys requesting that it be added to the title blacklist. This has been done because the article appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy are often given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent, or are added to the title blacklist.
Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete is considered disruptive and grounds for a block. Thank you.The name was protected because it has been repeatedly recreated despite not being notable.Domdeparis (talk) 13:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on David Finlay Jr, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. REEEEEbbon Salminen(talk)20:58, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
hey
Thanks
Hey man, I was surfing online and saw you made a wiki page for me. I appreciate it. I dont have a profile to edit. I wanted to see if you would post a picture i have? its for my profile. Forrestrox (talk) 22:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, HC7. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiger Joe Tomasso until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk20:40, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Overtagging
Hi, please see WP:Overtagging. In most cases only the two most important tags should be added and the others can wait until the main issues are addressed. Also, tags should not be added to redirect pages, thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 10:34, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priscilla Kelly until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk11:56, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, HC7. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
You proposed deletion of Tom MacDonald (rapper), but you did not provide any reason for deletion. Please provide your rationale for deleting the article, using the "concern = " parameter of the proposed deletion template, so your proposal does not get declined for procedural reasons. Thanks. Bakazaka (talk) 04:43, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (2019 in Germany) has been reviewed!
An article you recently created, 2019 in Norway, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk)08:47, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created, 2019 in South Africa, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk)08:49, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created, 2019 in Russia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk)08:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created, 2019 in New Zealand, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk)08:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created, 2019 in Germany, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk)08:52, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Inappropriate behaviour
HC7, I'm afraid I have to issue you a warning for inappropriate behaviour. You've created a number of unreferenced articles. I posted on your talk page to please discuss the matter on one of the talk pages. You never responded to that message on your talk page. I twice pinged you from an article's talk page. Again, you chose not to respond to that. I'd like to make two points. Firstly, it's considered good conduct on Wikipedia that you engage in discussion with other editors when they bring up issues. Secondly, and maybe more importantly, do not create unreferenced articles in mainspace. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources. I'm happy to elaborate further or answer any questions you may have; please ping me with any reply. Schwede6609:07, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Hello there, You tagged this one with multiple speedies without paying close attentions to those criteria. A1 is not suitable as there are context that the subject is a film director. A3 is not suitable as the article definitely has content. G2 does not apply here as this is in no way a test edit. Please read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion and understand those criteria before nominating another article. Regards. Hitro talk10:39, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Just a heads up. These don't imply you've done anything wrong, but I don't think you've gotten the notification in the past. Nblundtalk22:06, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
Hi User:HC7, thanks for your various edits yesterday in the List of German composers. Since you were active in a few letter sections and in others not, I take it that you intend to continue, which is fine. But please follow WP editing rules, in particular:
1. Please use the long dash/hyphen (or "em-dash"), not the simple short hyphen.
2. For living persons, please don't write "(1970-present)" but "(born 1970)".
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 in North Korea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.
The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error, specifically formatting tags that are in the wrong order.
The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Change the signature as shown below, or make other edits to make the signature appear how you want it to appear.
Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.
Current signature: <font size="4">'''HC</font><font size="5">7</font><font size="1.5"><sup>''[[User talk:HC7|Leave me a message!]]''</sup>'''</font>
Fixed signature: '''<span style="font-size:large;">HC</span><span style="font-size:x-large;">7</span><sup>''[[User talk:HC7|<span style="font-size:small;">Leave me a message!</span>]]''</sup>'''
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Amazing Red, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 21:50, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
