User talk:GuruMannFitnessExpert

Hi GuruMannFitnessExpert! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

08:30, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guru Mann (March 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Cites no reliable, in-depth, independent sources that could be used to establish the notability of the subject. Note that the subject's own website is WP:PRIMARY, and that Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube are all unreliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Guru Mann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Guru Mann, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 10:54, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI

You have an obvious conflict of interest and you must declare it. Please don't write about yourself

Also read the following regarding writing an article

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to you or your organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the you claims or interviewing you. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls. You gave no references as defined above, only YouTube and social media links Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:24, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, not self-promoting like yours.
there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
The image was copied from your website, which claims copyright, so it can't be used here since it's not explicitly free to use for any purpose.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:20, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:GuruMannFitnessExpert/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:GuruMannFitnessExpert/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:09, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GuruMannFitnessExpert (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have understand why you were blocked me. And also understanding of the policy which I had against on Wikipedia. I had posted Unrefrenced spam links for my content because I am new on Wikipedia. I will not repeat this mistake again in future. For this happening extremely sorry, Next time I will create content according to guidelines make sure this will not against Wikipedia policy. And also use sandbox for making better content and approved by your team. If you approved my sandbox content then I will send request for review content. Hope Wikipedia team understands my request and unblocks my account. Thank you

Decline reason:

No, the links aren't the major problem. The major problem is your violations of WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and WP:PAID. You won't be unblocked to write about Guru Mann. Yamla (talk) 13:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It appears to me that the only way you can be unblocked is if you agree to not edit about yourself, your business, or anything related to your conflict of interest(this would include your field in general). If you are prepared to do that, please do so and tell what you will edit about instead. 331dot (talk) 13:33, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that this user now appears to be socking as User:Ganesh Periwal. —Wasell^(T) 16:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

~~ Hi team, i want to create biography page like this https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Roger_Snipes Please guide me how can i create this. ~~

To be unblocked, you will need to do as you have been asked above, including in my earlier comment. You will also need to address the socking. 331dot (talk) 09:29, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]