User talk:Gurch/Archive 20

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Gurch. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 15

←

Archive 18

→

Your user page

I was very surprised to see blue, not red, after one of your comments. Darkspots (talk) 01:37, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

nothing to do with me Gurch (talk) 10:03, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Ah, but the color suits you. Even if I'm not too partial to the kittens. Darkspots (talk) 12:42, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Whaaaaat? What's wrong with the kittens?? :P delldot on a public computer talk 03:42, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Those are evil looking kittens. – iride scent 03:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

They are NOT! Well, the orange one's not. Because it's mastered the art of looking innocent. The black one's still working on that whole "covering up the fact that it wants to tear your face off" thing. delldot ∇. 01:35, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

No, they both look evil. Too much squinting on the eyes... Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 02:33, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

MfD

Its just a test I'm doing at the moment. Currently, I am one of the only editors who maintains MfD, until I can get the bot working again. Too often, when editors file an MfD, they ignore the date header and put it under the current one. I've placed commented date headers there so that when someone transcludes, you might double check. We don't have to use them, but I've also been using them for a few weeks in the closed discussions section, and they seem to be working there. I'm going off line now. Later gurch. Synergy 14:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Annoying bug in the new version of Huggle

I'm not sure if you take these sorts of comments, or whomever does it, but I'll simply start with you. In the new version of Huggle, I'm finding that every dialog box, when I click "cancel", it comes back up, and then if I cancel again, it comes up once more, requiring another cancel to finally quell it. miquonranger03 (talk) 21:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

- Most, if not all. I remember the "message user" tool, the box asking something along the lines of "you are trying to revert to another edit from the user who is being reverted", and, if I'm not mistaken, the "edit page" tool all having this problem at one time or another.
  - It's not too much of a problem, and if it seems to be an isolated incident, don't worry about it. :D miquonranger03 (talk) 22:07, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Seeing as I'm here – I can't replicate this one. – iride scent 03:58, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

I can actually confirm that this happens at least upon hitting "OK". Cancel I haven't tried. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 04:07, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I'm getting this now. Must be an intermittent thing as it sometimes works fine. – iride scent 20:17, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Now in addition to that, I'm getting the error message

ArgumentOutOfRangeException: StartIndex cannot be less than zero. Parameter name: startIndex at System.String.InternalSubStringWithChecks(Int32 startIndex, Int32 length, Boolean fAlwaysCopy) at Huggle.Page.get_Owner() at Huggle.Queue.MatchesFilter(Edit Edit) at Huggle.Processing.ProcessNewEdit(Edit Edit) at Huggle.Irc.ProcessIrcEdit(Object EditObject)

68.83.162.220 (talk) 15:53, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

actually, i'm miquonranger03 (talk) 15:54, 13 September 2008 (UTC) (forgot to sign in)

Talk:Nick Berg/Nunh-huh

I found Talk:Nick Berg/Nunh-huh and thought of deleting it, but it contains discussion. I thought of moving it to Talk:Nick Berg/Archive 1, but that was taken. I saw your name in the Archive 1 history. If you have some time, would you please look into this. Thanks. -- Suntag ☼ 14:01, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Regarding Huggle

Sorry to bother you about this, but I was very interested in using Huggle (seeing as VP is now discontinued), however I have been getting a constant "Unable to login" message and I'm not entirely sure why (I posted on the feedback page about this). Also, in case you were interested, on Vista Ultimate I am getting a null argument exception (at System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary`2.FindEntry(TKey key)) when starting up version 0.8.1. I apologise again for bothering you with this but I will appreciate any help :) --Razor ICE 10:16, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Yes, everyone and their dog seems to be getting this. It will be fixed in the next version, but when that version will be available, I have no idea. In the meantime, use the previous version of Huggle, which does not have this problem -- Gurch (talk) 17:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply, but I meant that I am getting an "Unable to login" problem with the older version, 0.7.12 (and I really want to use it xD). I'm not behind any firewalls or proxies, so I have no idea what could be causing it. Any ideas? Or is this what you were referring to? Well, thanks again :) --Razor ICE 13:25, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

See the discussion here: Wikipedia:Huggle/Feedback/Archive 7#Unable_to_login_with_non-unified_accounts --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 10:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Huggle is just plain superb

I have been a Huggle user for 6 months now and I can honestly say it would be impossible to fight vandalism without it. The work you have done is appreciated by all. I just wanted to let you know. --CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 10:43, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Blue_Öyster_Cult_-_(Don't_Fear)_The_Reaper.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Blue_Öyster_Cult_-_(Don't_Fear)_The_Reaper.ogg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ★ Bigr Tex 01:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

It does have a fair use rationale. One simply needs to look carefully for it. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 01:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Didn't I decline this exact same request from you last month? – iride scent 01:54, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

[1] - different person. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 02:30, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

These taggings are presumably down to someone using a semiautomated tool too fast without fully reading the material they're tagging, or not reading the instructions on how to use it correctly. I'm sure I've heard that somewhere else, but just where escapes me for the moment. – iride scent 02:49, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Of course, it could also be someone who has been reviewing rationales for 18+ months, using a semiautomated tool, who while generally liberal about rationales thinks that Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline's recommendation that the rationale include "What purpose does the image serve in the article?" is important.

The fact that the word 'rationale' was nowhere on the page did make it look at first glance as if nobody had tried to create a rationale. On further review, this summary does a better job of covering the other necessary components for a rationale than most WP:Music Samples I've looked at in the last couple of months.

I still think that it would be good to include a rationale for how the presence of this particular bit of non-free music significantly increases readers' understanding of (Don't Fear) The Reaper.^* For instance, is it for identification, illustration, or commentary? How does it fulfill that role in the article? ★ Bigr Tex 16:59, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I've been huggled!

LOL, thanks for the laugh. Hi, Gurch. I'll have to *twinkle* you back, since I don't think Huggle works on a Mac. TravellingCari 20:47, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

indeed it is. It's also the one I'm most familiar with having lived in Japan. I think I've come to associate you, by way of discussions on Iri's talk, with the wiki-Huggle. :) TravellingCari 20:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

You otter drop me a note

Haven't talked to you in a while. :( How you doing? delldot ∇. 04:39, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Huggle

How come everytime I open Huggle, it breaks, and tells me I have to send the error report to Microsoft? Thanks, A^{(Reply!,Contribs!)} 11:32, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Because it's broken -- Gurch (talk) 12:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay, so I definitely don't want to update from 7.12 yet, right? 128.187.0.178 (talk) 17:19, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Okay, so how do I fix it? A^{(Reply!,Contribs!)} 19:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Study programming, get a job at the WMF as a software developer, and rewrite MediaWiki. The faults are down to changes in the MediaWiki software, not Huggle itself. – iride scent 19:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Or take the slightly easier option of waiting until I fix it -- Gurch (talk) 21:44, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Like all your headers say huggle... are you tired of that word yet?

In response to your latest post to my talk page: Hahaha, <3.

I downloaded the old version of Huggle like a week ago. I know it's broke, but it's still boss. You're brilliant, Gurch. Let me know when you've coded around the jacked MediaWiki changes, and I'll upgrade.

Mad luv and sniggles ;) Jennavecia ^(Talk) 23:33, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

~Huggle~

I just couldn't resist adding to the pile on of "Huggle" section headers! Hugs right back atcha, Gurch! Ariel♥Gold 02:29, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Thankyou

Thankyou for being a pleasure to work with during my time on WP, I really appreciate it. You've even got a mention on my userpage. ;) *BIG HUGS* Lradrama 07:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Wording

Hi. In reminding User talk:Jeff G. to use the shared IP clause at the end of his revert warnings, he brought to my attention that you created the template he used and to make you aware of the improper omission as well. For more informaiton you can link to his talk page. Best Regards 45Factoid44 (talk) 21:19, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

I'm being friendly. Don't act like I'm attacking you. User talk:Jeff G.‎ told me you were the reason he didn't add it for a shared IP and to tell you. Perhaps you should add a notation for users to use that for shared IP's. I was told to tell you becuasehe used your template soI did. It's not me singling you out. Relax! 45Factoid44 (talk) 21:42, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Edit to User talk:Iridescent

I rolled this edit back because it appeared to be vandalism. Just thought I should let you know in case there was a reason for it. Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 10:49, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

I was testing what happened if you tried to edit a page longer than 2 KB on a Nokia 6500. Apparently, bad things -- Gurch (talk) 10:51, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Classic or slide? Darkspots (talk) 10:52, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Slide. Though I don't suppose that makes much difference - Gurch (talk) 10:54, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Apparently not. Darkspots (talk) 10:55, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Ah, thought it was testing of some sort. :) Best, PeterSymonds (talk) 10:56, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha Gurch, get a decent phone! Nokia = fail XD ——Possum (talk) 10:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

(unindent) I thought the software had checks to ensure that the entire text of the revision goes through before it saves it. If not, that's a bug. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:00, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

It does. The text gets truncated by the browser's input field, the submitted request is syntactically correct. So to the server, the result is indistinguishable from that produced if the browser loads the full text of the page, and the user then erases most of it before saving -- Gurch (talk) 19:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Beattie Burger

I already deleted that once. Two years ago -- Gurch (talk) 17:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Hug

I'm sure you have an excellent reason for undoing my recent edit to Hug, but you didn't leave it in the edit summary. Knowing your reasoning would likely help my editing, so if you'd be so kind . . . --otherlleft (talk) 00:37, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Internal Wikipedia software, which does not meet our inclusion criteria, does not merit a mention in an unrelated article -- Gurch (talk) 10:39, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

The policy is understandable, but what does one do when one is searching for Huggle the software, and gets redirected to Hug? I think it's reasonable to steer people in the right direction, just as we do with terms like Vandalism.--otherlleft (talk) 14:14, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Huggle

Is it possible for you to release to source code so I can port it over onto MacOSX?Jab843 (talk) 04:12, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

http://code.google.com/p/huggle/source/checkout. It's .NET, though -- Gurch (talk) 10:37, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Your recent actions

Hee hee, very funny. :P ›mysid (☎∆✎) 09:11, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Hey

Hi Gurch!

I just wanted to take a minute to let you know how awesome you are. If you ever want to take the plunge, ping me so I can nom (or at least co-nom). J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 02:15, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Uh... LOL. You have read this and this, haven't you? -- Gurch (talk) 03:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I have seen both of those, although I admit I don't know the circumstances that led to the second one. Unless you blocked Jimbo or deleted the Main Page, my offer stands. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 03:40, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I requested it -- Gurch (talk) 13:32, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

greek huggle

Hi, is there any chance we may update the greek vandalometer automatically with huggle??

--Dimorsitanos (talk) 20:47, 26 October 2008 (UTC) from greek wikipedia

Image:Nick_at_laptop_lol.png listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nick_at_laptop_lol.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Localisation

Hi there Gurch, just a quick message, I translated the German localisation page for Huggle at Meta. Regards So Why 11:53, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Hi there. I saw this and I have added it into the next version of huggle. Thanks for your help :) ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 12:07, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Sure, no problem. If you haven't seen it, portuguese is translated as well. Regards So Why 12:23, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Yep that one has already been added :) ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 12:26, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Image to File namespace change

Hey gurch. I cant catch you on irc so I thought I would post this link here in case you havn't already seen it. [2] ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 15:47, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Don't object to proposals in limbo

There seems to be something building about your essay. We want to know if you consider this essay parody humor or not. If it's parody, it will be tagged as such; if not, it will be moved to a subpage of your user page for running against general consensus. you have 48 hours to contact me before a moving or tagging will take place.--Ipatrol (talk) 22:32, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

my essays are entirely serious from the perspective of whatever mental state I happen to be in when I write them :/ -- Gurch (talk) 04:41, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Huggle and welcome warnings

Hi Gurch, I've noticed that when I welcome vandals with {{subst:welcome-anon-vandal|Article|me=WereSpielChequers}} if it doesn't work and they go on vandalising, hugglers tend to give them a level 1 warning rather than a level 2 warning. Is this because of the edit summary I use, or does Huggle not treat the welcome-anon-vandal template as a level 1 warning? Ϣere Spiel Chequers 12:13, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Likely the latter, huggle doesn't use the edit summary to find warning levels. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 14:29, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Actually it does, but it doesn't know the summary "Welcome Warning", and information derived from the summary is overridden by information derived from the page text; {{welcome-anon-vandal}} lacked the identifying comment that most warning templates have, which Huggle uses to determine the level of a warning. I have added such a comment; once the next version of Huggle is released it will correctly interpret it as a warning -- Gurch (talk) 18:05, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks Gurch, as I often patrol RC looking at small edits by IPs with redlinked talkpages that is one of my favourite templates. Ϣere Spiel Chequers 01:25, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Quick question

Hey Gurch, long time...I have a quick Huggle question for you. Am I mistaken in believing that Huggle was only for people with access to rollback? I remember we had a discussion some months back where you said the next release (at the time) was going to require rollback access in order to operate. Has this been changed, was it never implemented, or am I just misremembering? I asked because I noticed a user without rollback rights who was using Huggle. Thanks, Metros (talk) 00:15, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

ATM Huggle requires rollback if Wikipedia:Huggle/Download is to be correct, so I'm a tad puzzled as well. Sam ^Blab 01:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

It works with or without rollback, but on this project is limited (unless recompiled with code changes) to users with the rollback permission -- Gurch (talk) 01:21, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Nevermind, I just noticed what I did. I was forgot to put "User:" before the user's user name in the logs. Whoops. False alarm. Thanks though! Metros (talk) 01:24, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Hey

I created a (probably stupid) logo for huggle in my free time just for the heck of it. What do you think? TNP (formerly Jonathan) 20:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

I think it looks like a giant pill. TNP (formerly Jonathan) 20:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Well at least it isn't a rip-off of a KDE icon like the current one -- Gurch (talk) 21:05, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Believe it or not, the text is based off of Myriad Pro. Just a little tweaking, and it looked like a ball of goo mysteriously spelling "huggle". I don't know where I got the "goo" idea, just playing with Inkscape. TNP (formerly Jonathan) 03:40, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

the logo looks like a rapid release capsule you take when you enter the matrix... -_- why oh why didn't I take the blue pill??!? - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 18:25, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dire Straits - Money for Nothing.ogg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Dire Straits - Money for Nothing.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Stupid Motorist Law Article

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the Stupid Motorist Law in which you removed the tag calling into question the article's "worldwide focus". While I concede that you were correct in questioning how an article on an Arizona local law could have "worldwide focus", I would like to point out my comments on the article's Talk page in which I propose that the article should be expanded to include information on similar laws in other jurisdictions, which should clear up any questions regarding the article's "worldwide focus". I have also had a discussion regarding this article with User:Exit2DOS2000 who agrees with me that the article should be expanded. --TommyBoy (talk) 23:07, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Update

Thanks for the amendment to my User page regarding Huggle. Can you send me the latest version of the software as the one I have been using is now out of date. Kind regards--Calabraxthis^(talk) 14:45, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Huggle/Download -- Gurch (talk) 19:32, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which recently passed with 126 in support, 22 in opposition and 6 neutral votes.

Thanks for my cute neutral vote :)
• If you want to reply to this message please use my talk page as watch listing about 150 pages is a bit messy •
·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 23:07, 5 November 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of CAT:

es-wiki

Please, see my report. I hope this could be easely solved :) Cheers. Dferg, ^Yes? _¿dígame? 21:04, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Disappearing

Sorry to confuse you. Glad you and others tracked me down. Hope all is well in your world. StarM 23:38, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Huggle Cookie

RockManQ ^(talk) has given you a Huggle cookie! Huggle Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a Huggle Cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of Huggle Cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

AfD nomination of Masuk High School

An article that you have been involved in editing, Masuk High School, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masuk High School. Thank you. Eastmain (talk) 02:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Gurch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Gurch (talk) 05:42, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

hahaha! Nice. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:38, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

lulz

nice edit on Addshore's userpage... - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ guestbook ♦ contribs} 18:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

I have to agree nice edit :P (oh wait am i meant to be saying that :O) BAD GURCH!!! [= [= ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 19:02, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

thanks

hi!thanks for creating huggle but please,could you modify it? people are "happy" when they got it and now some people are using it as a vandal tool.could you make a new version that enables the user to view the edit before reverting it?thank you--Revim (talk) 09:26, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean by "view"? It currently shows the differences between the edit and the previous revision; I'm not aware of any clearer method of showing the information -- Gurch (talk) 09:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

o hai

*snuggleglomp* لenna vecia 06:11, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Whitelist Question

Gurch, I like your program and software, Huggle, I have seen it in action beofre, and I was impressed. Yet, I was wondering what casued be to not be on the whitelist. I never vandalized, got speedied, and such. I rollbacked myself twice. Sorry for disturbing you. Zuzzerack (talk) 03:05, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

hugs

^_^ *mega huggles back*¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 20:06, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Huggle

What's the point of providing an option for use on Meta if the vandalism rate on that project is so low? -- IRP ☎ 22:07, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

It was requested. It doesn't currently work on Meta anyway. -- Gurch (talk) 22:35, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Can you please help me to finish resolving this CTJF83Talk 04:11, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

I hate to be a pain, but I'd really like to get Huggle working again. CTJF83Talk 20:41, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Can you help me or not? CTJF83Talk 18:18, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

hugs

*snuggles* delldot ∇. 06:46, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

*cuddles* delldot ∇. 03:49, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Just missed you! Come back? delldot ∇. 03:58, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

You naughty vandal you....

I mean all these warnings. When will you ever learn ;) StarM 13:04, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Congrats

Huggle is now a recognized word, no doubt thanks in part to your efforts: http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-world-europe/20081117/EU.Britain.New.Word/ –xeno (talk) 18:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

I think that is more due to the affectionate sort oh huggle, which is something anime fans came up with, than the software -- Gurch (talk) 23:14, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

`twas a wee joke sir –xeno (talk) 05:20, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if it helps, but I first saw the word in question in print in February 1983, on a poster advertising "National Huggle Week". It was apparently an initiative to spread the happiness of Valentine's Day a little wider. Philip Trueman (talk) 11:26, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Request

Hey Gurch!

If it's not too much trouble, and you get a chance, could you upload Huggle's entire project file to Google Code? Your new version has continued producing a random glitch on my system, and I think I could fix it. No one I have spoken to has been able to replicate the bug, so I think it's a problem with my hardware, unfortunately, I cannot figure out what is causing it. Thanks, J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:14, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Er... as far as I'm aware the entire project is on Google Code. What's missing? -- Gurch (talk) 05:13, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

heh, nothing. I was trying to compile it in the C# environment. :/ Whoops. Sorry for bugging you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 06:17, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Resolved

I helped J.delanoy fix the problem in IRC. 67.177.43.241 (talk) 01:52, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

O_o wasn't logged in when I replied there. Sory bout that. Vandalism Destroyer | Need to complain to me? 01:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

RE: Rollback for Huggle

Hi, i have been reverting changes for a while and am finding it hard to keep having to refresh the pages for recent changes.

A friend who also Patrols recent changes segestes using Huggle, in which i have since downloaded it. According to huggle i do not have the rollback permission, and yet i have been using rollback on pages.

help?

Many Thanks, Kira

Kirachinmoku (talk) 18:45, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

You may be confusing Twinkle's revert feature for the special user-right rollback. Rollback must be requested here. Calvin 1998 ^(t·c) 22:09, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Chuggle

Hi, I am writing a clone of Huggle in python (pyKDE in fact) for using it on linux. At the moment only the buttons of revert, whitelist and next-diff work, and there are a lot of things to fix/improve, but I just wanted to let you know :). The project is hosted in http://code.google.com/p/chuggle/ .Chabacano (talk) 19:43, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Ok. I did the changes and clarified everything. It is worth noting that I'm not using huggle's code.Chabacano (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Please stop

Your merge of WP:WAR and WP:WHEEL does not appear to have been based on any sort of discussion or consensus. This may not be your intention, but the effect of your actions has been disruptive. Please talk about such major changes first. I undid your good faith changes (and rolled back the redirect changes because it was easier to fix the large number of them with one click). Please, please, please discuss before merging policies. Thank you. Jehochman ^Talk 14:34, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Same goes for the merge of WP:3RR with WP:EW. There is a little discussion there but hardly what anyone could call consensus. Mango juice^talk 14:39, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Agree there isn't consensus, but disagree with the misuse of rollback tool - please be more careful with its use. A non-admin would probably have it revoked for actions like that, which are, in a way, edit warring. – How do you turn this on (talk) 15:07, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Let's not be silly. When a large number of redirects need to be fixed, it is stupid to have to do everything by hand. I believe an argument could be made that the merger without discussion was highly disruptive and unproductive edit. By extending more good faith to the user, I do not endanger myself for using rollback to fix a large quantity of redirects quickly. Jehochman ^Talk 16:04, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

I see nothing wrong with Jehochman's use of the rollback tool.--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 16:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Apologies; didn't realise it was more than one revert. I assumed Gurch only redirected the one page. Sorry, my mistake. – How do you turn this on (talk) 17:20, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Not everything has to be based on consensus. If it were, nothing would ever get done. -- Gurch (talk) 15:44, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

However, when dealing with official Wikipedia policy, boldness should be tempered with caution. Read the {{policy}} template at the top of the pages: "Any edit to this page should reflect consensus." Policies are meant to be reflections of community-wide practice and consensus. Unilaterally rearranging our policies/guidelines is not really tenable if we want a stable editing environment. In this case, the bold, revert, discuss cycle should really be the "discuss, consensus-based edit, discuss more" cycle. Merging these pages may be a great idea, but the community can't know that until you put forward your arguments as to why it should be done. Propose the merger on the talk pages of those pages you want to merge/move, and let other editors comment. Less drama all around. Cheers, and keep up the boldness (with caution, of course)!--Aervanath lives in the Orphanage 16:23, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Your user page

MfD

Annoying bug in the new version of Huggle

Talk:Nick Berg/Nunh-huh

Regarding Huggle

Huggle is just plain superb

Fair use rationale for Image:Blue_Öyster_Cult_-_(Don't_Fear)_The_Reaper.ogg

I've been huggled!

You otter drop me a note

Huggle

Like all your headers say huggle... are you tired of that word yet?

~*Huggle*~

Thankyou

Wording

Edit to User talk:Iridescent

RfD nomination of Beattie Burger

Hug

Huggle

Your recent actions

Hey

greek huggle

Image:Nick_at_laptop_lol.png listed for deletion

Localisation

Image to File namespace change

Wikipedia:Don't object to proposals in limbo

Huggle and welcome warnings

Quick question

Hey

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dire Straits - Money for Nothing.ogg)

Stupid Motorist Law Article

Update

RfA thanks

RfD nomination of CAT:

es-wiki

Disappearing

Huggle Cookie

AfD nomination of Masuk High School

lulz

thanks

o hai

Whitelist Question

*hugs*

Huggle

*hugs*

You naughty vandal you....

Congrats

Request

RE: Rollback for Huggle

Chuggle

Please stop

~Huggle~

hugs

hugs