User talk:Gundappa swami

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Garhi Pukhta, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 18:43, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Garhi Pukhta because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 11:40, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Garhi Pukhta. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 16:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Garhi Pukhta. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 17:26, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

You continue to add unsourced and WP:OR content to Garhi Pukhta. Please refrain from doing so as that might result in a block. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 17:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history at Garhi Pukhta shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

December 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — MusikAnimal ^talk 18:01, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Garhi Pukhta. — JJMC89 (T·C) 10:43, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:24, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Garhi Pukhta. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:32, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:07, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Garhi Pukhta. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]