User talk:GuardGoose

Welcome!

Hello, GuardGoose, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Gun laws in Colorado. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Viriditas (talk) 09:52, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm Dhtwiki. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to New York City have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dhtwiki (talk) 21:00, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Killing of Harambe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Meters (talk) 22:04, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Sicilian Americans are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages.
I understand that you added your personal opinion in good faith, but if you have reliable sources to back up your personal contention start up a new thread (instead of tacking in onto a nondescript thread years old), and bring your sources to the new thread. Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:49, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Lil Peep

Well, a Twitter post isn't really ideal as a source - in general, Twitter is not a WP:RS, and if Peep himself claimed it, we would need to treat that as we would any WP:SELFPUB. I think if a good source is found to substantiate his ethnicity, and the assertion that he held a valid Swedish passport, then that's all information that makes sense to include in the "Early Life" section, where heritage is typically addressed. He's clearly not Swedish by nationality (even if he is Swedish by ethnicity and may have held Swedish citizenship), since he was born in and lived in the United States his entire life. That distinction should be clear in the article. Chubbles (talk) 20:07, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]