User talk:Greg Tyler/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Greg Tyler. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Greg Tyler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Beacon (disambiguation). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Marek.69 talk 20:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Re: Welcome Message
Sorry, if I've upset the 'Red Link' image. Whoops. You could always blank it and request for it to be deleted. Cheers Marek.69 talk 20:46, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Ohai
Harumph ¬_¬ Amzi (Talk To Me) 21:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
JPEG-avi
Just a friendly note on JPEG-avi. I declined the speedy deletion request, as "poorly constructed" is not one of the speedy deletion reasons, it's an editing issue. If you don't feel comfortable fixing the article yourself, slap a maintenance tag such as {{copyedit}} or {{context}} on it, and let someone else have a stab at it. HTH.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:16, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Total wipeout editing
Well, I'll give some reasons. Sorry I did not see your message before.
1. It seems like advertising. To some, perhaps, it does, but to others it is a good source of information to turn to. That's why it is in "external links"
2. It lacks notability. Notability means, according to Wikipedia, "worthy of notice". Perhaps you do not feel the need to notice this site, but I am sure there are many Avid Fans who do. 3. It contains little information and does not further enhance the reader's knowledge of the subject. Wikipedia when it was first founded contained the same. This is a discussion board. By people entering it, It will become a larger resource. However, It does show precise instructions of how to get on the show, which the Wikipeda page does not.
4. It is not a reliable source."" There are many members that have been on the show "Wipeout" which Total wipeout was derived from. Another member is the Admin of a forum which has several links here on wikipedia. Certianly the site has more creditability then most of the people even writing the Total Wipeout page.
FOund a source in the Newham Recorder that acts toward WP:V and WP:N. Added it. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 06:52, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
I hope it will be useful for the article and the DYK. Best wishes, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 17:24, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:29, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
Facebook Poke Interpretations...
Hi Greg,
Although I respect your contributions regarding editing Wikipedia I have found your comment about calling my interpretation of Poke on Facebook "absurd" to be a form of unfair censorship. There are a large number of Facebbok users who have interpreted "the Poke" in many different ways, including the edit that I had added. It is important to point out that in the original Wikipedia definition of "Poke" the following words are used:
"...When we created the poke, we thought it would be cool to have a feature without any specific purpose. People interpret the poke in many different ways, and we encourage you to come up with your own meanings.."..."
Sincerely,
Facebook User
The poke feature allows one user to virtually poke another. Some users believe that the poke feature is some sort of Facebook foreplay. However, according to Facebook's FAQ section on the feature, "a poke is a way to interact with your friends on Facebook. When we created the poke, we thought it would be cool to have a feature without any specific purpose. People interpret the poke in many different ways, and we encourage you to come up with your own meanings." One such interpretation is the idea that a "poke" is another way of "teabagging" another user. Teabagging is the act of lowering one's testicles onto someones face, or into their mouth while they are laying down. Kind of resembles dipping a tea bag into a hot cup of water. In principle, this is intended to be a "nudge" to attract the attention of the other user. However, while many Facebook users, as intended, use the feature to attract attention or say hello,[12] some users[who?] construe it as a sexual advance. There are several applications on Facebook which extend the idea of the poke feature by allowing users to perform other actions to their friends (such as "kick" or "wave to"). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.252.210 (talk) 18:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
PhotoShare
Greg,
PhotoShare is an iPhone app similar to others listed including Twitterific. If you can suggest a modification to the language to reflect it not as advertising, but rather an option to tie in a visual perspective then that would be great. Again, your thoughts are welcome.
Thank you, Adam —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamJGSea (talk • contribs) 00:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I ADDED THIS COMMENT TO OUR PREVIOUS DISCUSSION ON MY PAGE, BUT WAS NOT SURE IF YOU COULD SEE IT SO I ADDED HERE AS WELL. THANKS, ADAM We offer a service like Twitpic -- except we offer a lot more. Anyone from PhotoShare can add his/her Twitter info into the profile page. So when a photo is uploaded to PhotoShare it generates a link posted to his/her Twitter account. I can send you a screen shot of my Twitter page if you'd like. So, while we do not mention Twit. . . in our name we offer services similar to those already posted. On this basis I would like to add the information back onto the Twitter page. Thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamJGSea (talk • contribs) 19:28, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Greg, I saw your message on my page and understand that the perspective should be from a user rather than from me in an unbiased fashion. We are already in conversation with our users about using Twitter so it is likely only a matter of time since many of quite tech savvy. Thanks again, Adam. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamJGSea (talk • contribs) 22:34, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
NPWatcher
Hi, Greg Tyler. I have granted you NPWatcher per your request here. After looking over a few of your contributions, your talk page, and your block log, I feel you can be trusted with the tool. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a note on my talk page. –Juliancolton | Talk 15:17, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:TweetDeck logo.png
Thank you for uploading File:TweetDeck logo.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk)(review) 15:38, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello. When you patrol new pages, acceptable articles or articles which have been tagged for deletion should be marked as "patrolled" using the link at the bottom right of the article. This saves time and work by informing fellow patrollers of your review of the page so that they do not duplicate efforts. Thank you. ∗ Smartse (talk) 16:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Twitter Mobile
Hi Greg,
Why was my Twitter Mobile page deleted, when it contained no blatant advertising when pages such as Twitterrific does nothing but advertise.
Twitter Mobile is a mobile client for Twitter - I do not understnd how I can say that without it being construed as advertising. I did examine many pages of like content and they seem to have no problems.
RandyWine (talk) 09:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
I was going to revert the same change that you reverted because it was unsourced and unclear on the chronology. However, for comparison's sake, I think it's worth considering that the Facebook article prominently touts Zuckerberg's Harvard credentials. Do you consider that inappropriate? --Notyourbroom (talk) 17:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi, I removed your speedy deletion tag, as the article has clear claims of significance/importance in my opinion, per my edit summary. decltype (talk) 01:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello
The Cleanup Barnstar | ||
its for that thing you did to the references section in List of Alex Rider characters. I've been trying to do it myself for 5 days but I couldn't. If you want to delete this I won't be offended.--Spongefrog (talk) 18:53, 7 April 2009 (UTC) |
Thankyou for saying thankyou--Spongefrog (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
I had that problem too, except I just added the underconstructin tag and let someone else do the hard work. It worked! Except i think its still a stub too.--Spongefrog (talk) 19:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Rollback
I have Tyler/Archive 1 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:10, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Tagging for speedy deletion
Hi there. I noticed you tagged Rafford railway station with speedy deletion criterion G11. Please review G11's wording and reasoning: It serves to delete articles which are written to promote its subject, by using blatantly promoting language and tone. Articles like this one, which only consist of the article name in the text can never meet this criterion (unless the article name itself is advertising). The page rather met criterion A3 for not having any real content (although it was mistakenly deleted as A1 by another admin). Please be more careful when tagging articles in the future, because each tag conveys a different message to the page creator. Some are positive (like test page, no content) while others can be perceived as assumptions of bad faith (vandalism, blatant advertising etc.). Regards SoWhy 12:16, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
NuclearWarfare (Talk) 13:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Green Front
Can you tell me why didn't you tell me that you proposed for deletion the Green Front article I have started? --Checco (talk) 06:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Green Front
Hi, the article Green Front has been proposed for deletion for the second time, I’m sorry, the main autor wasn’t informed about discussion which you attended too--Invitamia (talk) 12:00, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for the great tip on linking categories! I knew there had to be a way, because I've seen it done before, but I just never figured out how. I had made a note to myself to just click the edit button the next time I saw it, but I always forget. Thanks bunches for the great tip! Greg, I really appreciate it! — Ched : ? 17:57, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Encyclopaedia Metallum
Please see my reply in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Encyclopaedia_Metallum_(2nd_nomination). Evenfiel (talk) 17:44, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Deprod of Gangstar 2: Kings of L.A
I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Gangstar 2: Kings of L.A, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! MuZemike 16:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Prod
Ok then, could you tell me how to do that please? Do I write it after "concern ="
Thank you for informing me Ruyter (talk) 17:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
DYK nomination of CHERUB (organisation)
Hello! Your submission of CHERUB (organisation) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Smallman12q (talk) 00:44, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of CHERUB (organisation)
I have nominated CHERUB (organisation), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CHERUB (organisation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. SpinningSpark 11:34, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
Twitter GA Nomination
I have reviewed your GA nomination of Twitter and have placed it on hold for fourteen days - it still seems like constructive contributions are made to the article. Please see my comment at Talk:Twitter/GA1. Please feel free to respond there. Cheers, Vicenarian (talk) 16:51, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Vicenarian (talk) 14:28, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Dear Greg Tyler,
I have seen your post about American Club (eikaiwa) and responded with comments. There is another person who also responded with a post. Because I'm not sure you saw them I've chosen to write you on this page. You can find the posts at the links below. Thank you very much for your time and thoughtful consideration. Sincerely, Rayjameson (talk) 07:28, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/American_Club_(eikaiwa)
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:American_Club_(eikaiwa)
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Exleops
Rayjameson (talk) 07:28, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Adminship
Yeah I knew I had to do one more stage, how exactly do you add it to the main RfA page? Sought | Knock Knock | Who's There? 20:21, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
- Thank You, I'm 99.9 % sure I did it correctly, I'm here, Thank you for your help Sought | Knock Knock | Who's There? 23:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Typo team
Hi there, I just corrected a small typo on your user page, hope you don't mind. decltype (talk) 22:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: time since last edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
--Cybercobra (talk) 03:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Straw poll on displaying time since last edit
Hi, you weighed in on the "display time since last edit on article" discussion at the Village pump. I have now started a straw poll on the subject at WP:Village pump (proposals)#Straw poll. Your opinion would be appreciated. --Cybercobra (talk) 04:44, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Computerjoe's talk 16:58, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
From Bates
Greg,
I realize I had insufficeint data to support my facts of Wii Sports Resort, and i say facts for a reason. However, one pivotal resource would be Nintendo's demos from this year's E3 in L.A. Also if you had studied my listed Japanese site more closely, you would have easily found all of my information valid. If you still do not believe me, visit http://wii.com/jp/articles/wii-sports-resort/ so you may watch the videos & witness the truth of that I had spent my time typing, only to be deleted. I have spent countless hours researching my topic ever since a preview of it last year at E3 so I find myself very well informed on this topic. When you find that you had falsely accused my data, if possible, could you undo the changes you have made, if it is a simple task.
Oh! and one more thing, on the Japanese official website their is a picture of Wuhu Island, I implore you to compare it to the picture given in the Wii Fit manual of the unnamed island that you jog on. The resemblance is incontrovertible. They are exact duplicates of one another. If you still to not find my data adequate, maybe you should do some research yourself, as I have spent my entire previous year doing such. Remember to observe the links and videos attached to the websites carefully, as anyone should do, and may I be proven right and restore my hard work.
-Edgar Allen Bates —Preceding unsigned comment added by E. A. Bates (talk • contribs) 18:08, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
Greg,
Thank you very much for looking into this subject. However, if you cannot find much information, for it was hard even for myself, I shall just simply wait until the game nears launch and scout out all of the information I can locate. Thank you for understanding.
-Bates —Preceding unsigned comment added by E. A. Bates (talk • contribs) 12:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Wii Sports Resort
Woops sorry! This is a bit embarrassing, aha. I should have been more careful. Megata Sanshiro (talk) 00:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks, it is surprisingly easy to make. :) \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 06:47, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
UBX
I see what you mean and I understand you concern, feel free to edit the box whenever you want, however you want. Although I don't understand your theory, please see User:Scarce/box. I removed the feature that pulls up the subpage name. It only mutates with templates. ---Scarce |||| You shouldn't have buried me, I'm not dead--- 09:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Like I said, "feel free to edit the box whenever you want, however you want" ---Scarce |||| You shouldn't have buried me, I'm not dead--- 09:21, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
The WPVG Newsletter (Q2 2009)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 2, No. 4 — 2nd Quarter, 2009
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2009, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 15:24, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Ost (talk) 22:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: Commons grant, license change, new chapters, usability and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia and kidnapping, new comedy series
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Food and Drink
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Cheers!
~~~ has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!
You were right. My gravest mistake this week was to assume there was a case to weaken where obviously none was stated. This most definitely deserves at least one pint of your favourite festive beverage.
That being said, careful about overfeeding, it is said that the bridges become a real mess if they go for the last wafer-thin mint. :)
MLauba (talk) 22:33, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Big Brother in Wiki
Greg, this reminds me of George Orwell, if you know what I mean. "...There is some fairly substantial evidence here, where I suggest that Witizen might be preparing to "rally support" and Rich church mouse replies...". Compare signatures! What's next, DNA? I can save your time for further investigations and tell I share computer with Witizen. Maybe you need more detail about our relationship? No problem, I can tell. I deleted his remark, because I do not want any further fighting. But I agree that editors only talk about formal rules, investigate ridiculous "crimes", but do nothing to improve article. You may kill the article, but the bigger problem of competence will remain, no matter how you hate us for our criticism, call me sock or whatever. And I will talk about it aloud, because I want to make Wikipedia better. Rich church mouse (talk) 22:55, 16 July 2009 (UTC)Rich Church Mouse
- Thanks for your answer. Sounds like you are enjoying what you're saying. Very sad, if someone knows about flaws, does nothing to improve, or to help others people who care. Rich church mouse (talk) 16:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Rich Church Mouse
- In that case perhaps you kindly do something to stop this shameful SPI? At least undo your part. I don't particularly publicizing my intimate life details, especially sharing them with Wiki editors (many of whom seem teenagers, or behave like ones). Rich church mouse (talk) 17:31, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Rich church mouse.
- Ah... Well, go ahead. Just throw me out. Bravo, amigo. Rich church mouse (talk) 17:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Rich church mouse.
- In that case perhaps you kindly do something to stop this shameful SPI? At least undo your part. I don't particularly publicizing my intimate life details, especially sharing them with Wiki editors (many of whom seem teenagers, or behave like ones). Rich church mouse (talk) 17:31, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Rich church mouse.
- Thanks for your answer. Sounds like you are enjoying what you're saying. Very sad, if someone knows about flaws, does nothing to improve, or to help others people who care. Rich church mouse (talk) 16:54, 17 July 2009 (UTC)Rich Church Mouse
Real life
I'm bemused by your comments on the AEE talk page. What do you do in RL that explains this? Peter Damian (talk) 21:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- [edit] Oh you write about Twitter [1]. Actually what is Twitter? Peter Damian (talk) 21:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. I'm a v old person. Nearly all my professional life has been based on the premiss that you succeed based on your expertise. In turn, the difficult task of choosing and paying experts to do a job is best done by reference or by consulting other experts, as well as checking people out yourself - but the problem is how to decide whether someone else is an expert, when you are not yourself an expert on the subject. My experience over 40 years has been mostly that when people choose experts at a particular job, they choose on the basis of expertise, rather than being 'nice' or good-looking or something like that. So I was quite surprised that an association of experts should be so viciously attacked like this.
My background is 6 years of editing Wikipedia and increasing frustration in battling vested interests and points of view. Hope that explains things - I was really upset by the attacks. Peter Damian (talk) 08:27, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
- Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
- Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
- Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
- News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
- Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 09:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Category:States and territories established in 2008
Just saw that you reverted this. There are a number of micronations in this and related categories. user:Good Olfactory seems to think this is reasonable, see his talk page. I don't, I see this as Wikipedia acknowledging these are states or territories. (Note I won't be online for about 6-8 hours now). Dougweller (talk) 07:46, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: WMF elections, strategy wiki, museum partnerships, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Dispute over Rorschach test images, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:23, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
- Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
- News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:43, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
Six degrees of Wikipedia listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Six degrees of Wikipedia. Since you had some involvement with the Six degrees of Wikipedia redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). cesarb (talk) 01:09, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Lololol
Space pirates! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.25.193.206 (talk) 23:17, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
- Balls, I think I messed up. 82.25.193.206 (talk) 23:20, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
NOTIFY
Hi, Greg - you'd offered some help on the wording of the NOTIFY essay. I don't think that it necessarily has to be lengthy or detailed; I had in mind something roughly like this:
“ | When you seek sanctions against a user, it is expected that you notify them by posting a message on their talk page. There are two sides to most stories, and it is only fair that the accused is given notice and opportunity to be heard.
Notification is expressly required on various administrator noticeboards. For example, the Admin's noticeboard and ANI require that you "inform other users and editors if they are mentioned in a posting, or if their actions are being discussed" or are even "the subject of a discussion." The Wikiquette Alerts noticeboard requires that you "[n]otify the reported user(s)." And when you file a formal sockpuppetry investigation request, you must "[n]otify all the users you are accusing." These warnings, however, are not isolated, unrelated provisions applicable only to the pages containing them. Rather, they are manifestations of a broader judgment by the community that both sides of a dispute should be heard. This principle applies to any public action you take that is designed to get another user into hot water, whether it is on an administrator's noticeboard, an article talk page, an administrator's talk page, etc. |
” |
That's pretty rough, and any input would be appreciated. The metaphor that I'm looking for to describe the explicit notification requirements, and which is eluding my grasp, is that I want a word or term that denotes a series of islands that appear seperate on the surface but that are in fact all interconnceted peaks in a single undersea mountain. I just can't think what that term is (I had thought archipelago, but apparently not).- Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 00:23, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- If the metaphor is sound but there isn't a word, I'll try just writing it out concisely as an illustration. Re judgment/judgement, it seems to be an American English / British english difference. Certainly the no e form prevails in the context I'm most familiar with, e.g. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) or FRAP 36; Fowler's confirms the intuition, noting that while both are correct, the include-e form prevails in British everyday usage, the no e form prevails in British legal usage and universally in American usage (third ed. 1996 at 426). - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 16:21, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- I'm tempted to suggest following the guidance of Mr. C (viz., that great philosophical writing that "Es are good"), but I fear that would mark my age. ;) I've created it per your suggestion at the village pump (i.e. at Wikipedia:Notification with a redirect from WP:NOTIFY), and feel free to edit it as you'd like. :) - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 16:35, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
- Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
- News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:15, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Is Blip.FM not well known?
A lot of Twitter accounts I follow seem to use it. Admittedly I can't think of a media reference to it. If I were to get a figure for what percentage of Twitter users use it, would It be notable?----o̴̿c̡̯̗̗̲̤͆͊̔̄c͖͇͌͂̏̍̎ọ̥͈͎̭͒n͇͈͔͚̰͈͖ͩ͌̆̆o̼͕̺̯̫̭ͣͪ̍ͬͪ̈ (talk) 22:12, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
WP:VG/N tool
Do you know what happened to your cool conversion tool? MrKIA11 (talk) 14:23, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- OK, np, take your time. I just wasn't sure if you were aware of it. Thanks, MrKIA11 (talk) 19:59, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
- Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Renaming {{otheruses4}}
I've started a new thread on Template_talk:Otheruses4#Request_move_discussion about moving {{otheruses4}} to a less esoteric title and I'd like to invite you to the discussion. Cheers, Sligocki (talk) 20:36, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
- Flagged protection and patrolled revisions: Misleading media storm over flagged revisions
- Flagged protection background: An extended look at how we got to flagged protection and patrolled revisions
- Wikimania: Report on Wikimania 2009
- News and notes: $2 million grant, new board members
- Wikipedia in the news: WikiTrust, Azerbaijan-Armenia edit wars
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 17:02, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009
- From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
- News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Please update your status with WP:VG
Dear WikiProject Video games member,
You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in the recent months.
The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.
All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:
- Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
- Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)
Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009
- Opinion essay: White Barbarian
- Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
- Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
- News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009
- New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
- Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
- News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The WPVG Newsletter (Q3 2009)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 2, No. 5 — 3rd Quarter, 2009
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2009, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 04:13, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009
- From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
- Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
- Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
- News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
- Dispatches: Sounds
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
- News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
- In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
- Interview: Interview with John Blossom
- News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
- In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
- Article contest: Durova wins 2009 WikiCup
- Conference report: WikiSym features research on Wikipedia
- Election report: 2009 ArbCom elections report
- Audit Subcommittee: Inaugural Audit Subcommittee elections underway
- Dispatches: Wikipedia remembers the Wall
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: Project banner meta-templates
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
- New pages experiment: Wikipedians test the water at new page patrol
- German controversy: German Wikipedia under fire from inclusionists
- Multimedia usability: Multimedia usability meeting concludes in Paris
- Election report: Arbitration Committee candidate nominations open 10 November
- News and notes: Ant images, public outreach, and more
- In the news: Beefeater vandalism, interview, and more
- Sister projects: Meta-wiki interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser begins
- Bulgarian award: Bulgarian Wikipedia gets a prestigious award
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Several candidates standing
- In the news: German lawsuit, Jimbo interview and more
- Sister projects: Wiktionary interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
- Uploading tool: New tool for photo scavenger hunts
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Nominations closing November 24
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser continues
- News and notes: Government stubs, Suriname exhibit, milestones and more
- In the news: The Decline of Wikipedia, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election begins December 1, using SecurePoll
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
- From the editors: 250th issue of the Signpost
- Editorial: A digital restoration
- Election report: ArbCom election in full swing
- Interview: Interview with David G. Post
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
- Election report: Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
- Election report: ArbCom election result announced
- News and notes: Fundraiser update, milestones and more
- In the news: Accusation of bias, misreported death, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
Another gentle ping from WP:VG
Dear Greg Tyler,
You are receiving this message because either [[Category:WikiProject Video games members]] or {{User WPVG}}
is somewhere in your userspace, and you are currently listed in the "Unknown" section on the project's member list.
The member list is meant to provide a clearer picture of active membership. It is recommended that you update your status if you plan to regularly:
- Edit video game-related pages in the Article namespace
- Participate in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)
Members listed in the "Unknown" section will be removed from the membership list and category at the end of January 2010. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.
Sincerely, the Video Games WikiProject (delivery by xenobot 21:49, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
- News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The WPVG Newsletter (Q4 2009)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 2, No. 6 — 4th Quarter, 2009
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2009, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:10, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
- News and notes: Fundraiser ends, content contests, image donation, and more
- In the news: Financial Times, death rumors, Google maps and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
- From the editor: Call for writers
- 2009 in review: 2009 in Review
- Books: New Book namespace created
- News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
- News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Wikipedia's birthday and more
- In the news: Wikipedia on the road, and more
- WikiProject report: Where are they now?
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
- BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar
- Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century
- News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more
- In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?
- WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hi Greg Tyler,
I notice that you've been doing some great work regarding CHERUB and Henderson's Boys. Please consider joining the CHERUB and Henderson's Boys task force, an effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of CHERUB and Henderson's Boys. If you would like to participate please pop over to the project page where you can join the project and see an open list of tasks that you can help with. Thank you for your time. |
Regards, Rock drum (talk·contribs·guestbook) 19:05, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
- News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more
- In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more
- Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
- News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
- In the news: Macmillan's Wiki-textbooks and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Mammals
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
- Reference desk: Wikipedia Reference Desk quality analyzed
- News and notes: Usability, 15M articles, Vandalism research award, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Severe Weather
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
- News and notes: Financial statements, discussions, milestones
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Java
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
- News and notes: A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs
- Dispatches: GA Sweeps end
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Ireland
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
I have nominated List of Twitter services and applications, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Twitter services and applications. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ZacBowling (user|talk) 11:32, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
- Wikipedia-Books: Wikipedia-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts
- News and notes: Explicit image featured on Wikipedia's main page
- WikiProject report: Percy Jackson Task Force
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
- Sister projects: A handful of happenings
- WikiProject report: The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
- News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup
- Features and admins: This week in approvals
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The WPVG Newsletter (Q1 2010)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2010, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 16:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
- Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
- News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
- From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars
- Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders
- News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Wikipedia advertising, and more!
- In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!
- Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010
- Book review: Review of The World and Wikipedia
- News and notes: iPhone app update, Vector rollout for May 13, brief news
- In the news: Government promotes Tamil Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U.S. Roads
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010
- From the editor: Reviewers and reporters wanted
- Commons deletions: Porn madness
- Wikipedia books launched: Wikipedia books launched worldwide
- News and notes: Public Policy and Books for All
- In the news: Commons pornography purge, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Birds
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010
- News and notes: Backstage at the British Museum
- In the news: In the news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Essays
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010
- News and notes: New puzzle globe, feature for admins, Israel's "Wikipedia Bill", unsourced bios declining
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Saints
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010
- Photography: Making money with free photos
- News and notes: Wikimedians at Maker Faire, brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Zoo
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010
- From the team: Changes to the Signpost
- News and notes: "Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more
- Free Travel-Shirts: "Free Travel-Shirts" signed by Jimmy Wales and others purchasable
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Comedy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010
- News and notes: Pending changes goes live, first state-funded Wikipedia project concludes, brief news
- In the news: Hoaxes in France and at university, Wikipedia used in Indian court, Is Wikipedia a cult?, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010
- Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons
- News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U2
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010
- Objectionable material: Board resolution on offensive content
- In the news: Wikipedia controlled by pedophiles, left-wing trolls, Islamofascists and Communist commandos?
- Public Policy Initiative: Introducing the Public Policy Initiative
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Ships
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010
- Wikimania preview: Gearing up for Wikimania in Gdańsk
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Children's Literature
- Features and admins: This week's highlights
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010
- UK COI edits: British politicians accused of WP cover-ups
- News and notes: Board changes, Wikimania, Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Article ownership, WikiProjects vs. Manual of Style, Unverifiable village
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Apple Inc.
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010
- News and notes: Politician defends editing own article, Google translation, Row about a small Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Up close with WikiProject Animals
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom to appoint CU/OS positions after dumping election results
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010
- News and notes: New interwiki project improves biographies, and other news
- In the news: Wikipedia leads in customer satisfaction, Google Translate and India, Citizendium transition, Jimbo's media accolade
- WikiProject report: These Are the Voyages of WikiProject Star Trek
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Discussion report: Controversial e-mail proposal, Invalid AfD
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010
- News and notes: Canadian political edits, Swedish royal wedding, Italian "right of reply" bill, Chapter reports
- In the news: Gardner and Sanger on why people edit Wikipedia, Fancy and frugal reading devices, Medical article assessed
- WikiProject report: Always Expanding: WikiProject Images and Media
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
- News and notes: FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee
- In the news: Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more
- Sister projects: Strategic Planning update
- WikiProject report: Chocks away for WikiProject Aviation
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 16 August 2010
- WikiProject report: A Pit Stop with WikiProject NASCAR
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom releases names of CU/OS applicants after delay
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 23 August 2010
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Cryptozoology
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision of climate change case posted
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 30 August 2010
- In the news: Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: Studying WikiProject Universities
- Features and admins: Featured article milestone: 3,000
- Arbitration report: What does the Race and intelligence case tell us?
The Signpost: 6 September 2010
- Book review: Cognitive Surplus, by Clay Shirky
- WikiProject report: Putting articles in their place: the Uncategorized Task Force
- Features and admins: Bumper crop of admins; Obama featured portal marks our 150th
- Arbitration report: Interim desysopping, CU/OS appointments, and more
- Technology report: Development transparency, resource loading, GSoC: extension management
The Signpost: 13 September 2010
- News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes
- Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment
- Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration
- WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab
- Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 20 September 2010
- From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost
- News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes
- In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories
- Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 September 2010
- News and notes: French million, controversial content, Citizendium charter, Pending changes, and more
- WikiProject report: Designing WikiProject Architecture
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 4 October 2010
- WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes
- Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news
The Signpost: 11 October 2010
- News and notes: Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more
- In the news: Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Smithsonian Institution
- Features and admins: Big week for ships and music
- Dispatches: Tools, part 3: Style tools and wikEd
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 18 October 2010
- News and notes: Wikipedia fundraiser event, Frankfurt book fair, news in brief
- WikiProject report: Show Me the Money: WikiProject Numismatics
- Features and admins: A week for marine creatures
- Dispatches: Common issues seen in Peer review
- Arbitration report: Climate change case closes after 4 months
- Technology report: Video subtitling tool, staff vs. volunteer developers, brief news
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q3 2010
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 2 — 3rd Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q3 2010, the project has:
|
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:38, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2010
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 3, No. 3 — 4th Quarter, 2010
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q4 2010, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:43, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2011
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2011
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 02:44, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2011
The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 4, No. 2 — 2nd Quarter, 2011
Previous issue | Next issue
Project At a Glance
As of Q2 2011, the project has:
|
Content
|
–MuZemike 14:16, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Greg Tyler/Archive 1! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Orphaned non-free image File:Nivio logo.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Nivio logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 11:48, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Big Rigs.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Big Rigs.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:07, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Greg Tyler/CHERUB (organisation)
User:Greg Tyler/CHERUB (organisation), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Greg Tyler/CHERUB (organisation) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Greg Tyler/CHERUB (organisation) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Magioladitis (talk) 17:31, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:IT Manager 3.png)
Thanks for uploading File:IT Manager 3.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:25, 30 March 2013 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:SSX blur screenshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:SSX blur screenshot.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. RJaguar3 | u | t 03:42, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Possible removal of AWB access due to inactivity
Hello! There is currently a request for approval of a bot to manage the AutoWikiBrowser CheckPage by removing inactive users, among other tasks. You are being contacted because you may qualify as an inactive user of AWB. First, if you have any input on the proposed bot task, please feel free to comment at the BRFA. Should the bot task be approved, your access to AWB may be uncontroversially removed if you do not resume editing within a week's time. This is purely for routine maintenance of the CheckPage, and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You will be able regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:36, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Club Caribe title screen.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Club Caribe title screen.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Greg Tyler. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |