User talk:GranWil

This is GranWil's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Epsa Music (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ca were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notability is bit shaky – many of the sources mention this company in passing only. Some seem suspiciously like churnalism, such as [1], where there is no by-line coupled with promotional wording.

Some statements are misleadingly cited. For example, nowhere in the NYT sources does it say "of Argentine tango and folklore, and has grown to become one of the most important record labels in South America, bringing together a diverse mix of production and distribution, A&R, and digital music assets.[3]" That marketing buzz reads like it was pulled straight from the company's website.

In "Together with DBN (Distribuidora Belgrano Norte), they were the pioneer companies in these services in Argentina." The source never mentions that they are "pioneers".

"Being the first company in Argentina to manufacture magazines, then cassettes, it was also the first company to have a machine to make compacts" This is supported by the company's official's own words; this kind of non-independent source cannot supprt a promotional claim like this.

And that's just the claims I checked – please review the sources to make sure they are reliable, independent, and supports the claim made in the draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Epsa Music and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GranWil! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:30, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Epsa Music has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Epsa Music. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 06:36, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Epsa Music (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gene93k was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Insufficient depth of coverage by secondary sources WP:CORPDEPTH. Coverage of partnerships and launches is routine in nature (churnalism).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Epsa Music and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

• Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Epsa Music

Hello, GranWil. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Epsa Music".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]