User talk:Goodpeoplework

Please Review the Page-http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/K.P_Joseph_Kalarickal

Authority Control has been introduced, Article is now connected to other wiki articles, and the styling has been modified according to wikipedia guidelines. Please review the page

Goodpeoplework, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Goodpeoplework! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join experienced editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from experienced editors. These editors have been around for a long time and have extensive knowledge about how Wikipedia works. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from experts. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of OCR Services Inc

Hello Goodpeoplework,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged OCR Services Inc for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

===Unspecified source/license for File:GMI-logo.png=== Logo

Thanks for uploading File:GMI-logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 07:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tavola Shop Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tavola Shop Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Global Media Insight for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Global Media Insight is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Media Insight until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 12:25, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:GMI-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:GMI-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Global Media Insight

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Global Media Insight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Media Insight. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SITH (talk) 12:17, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Goodpeoplework. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Thjarkur (talk) 12:23, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Global Media Insight (September 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Global Media Insight, which has already discussed the subject.

If you disagree with the deletion, you may appeal it at Deletion Review. Resubmitting in both draft space and article space without any indication that this draft is different from the deleted draft is disruptive.

This draft has been Rejected by a reviewer in the Articles for Creation review process. DO NOT resubmit this draft or attempt to resubmit this draft or prepare or submit a draft that is substantially the same as this draft without discussing the reasons for the rejection. You may request a discussion with the rejecting reviewer, or you may request a discussion with the community at the Teahouse. A discussion will not necessarily agree to a resubmission. If this draft is resubmitted, or an attempt is made to resubmit this draft or an equivalent draft, without addressing the reasons for the Rejection, a topic-ban or a partial block may be requested against the submitting editor, and the draft may be nominated for deletion.

You may ask for advice about Rejection at the Teahouse.

Robert McClenon (talk) 17:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Specifically this consulting agency by the same name. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79)[[User talk:ReaderofthePack|,

Sir, I am a wiki user from India. Trust me I have no connection with the company you have mentioned, i have not even heard about a company like that. I am telling 100 percent truth. Trust me on this please.

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Goodpeoplework (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

nicesimpleguy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am not a spammer Sir. Trust me. Humbly request you to please unblock me

Decline reason:

Pretty clear likelihood of WP:UPE here. "Trust me" isn't sufficient, given the history of your edits. Yamla (talk) 10:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have you been paid to come on to Wikipedia and create articles? The type of articles you're creating, paired with the tone of the deleted article (Global Media Insight) gives off the strong impression that there is undisclosed paid editing. Now while you can edit with a conflict of interest or as a paid editor, there is a very, very specific way that you have to go about this. One is that the paid editing must be disclosed and another is that if you wish to create new articles, you should go through the Articles for Creation process. There are other key aspects to this that is detailed in the information posted above. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:50, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yamla ReaderofthePack,

Honestly its getting very intimidating to edit wikipedia. I have only attempted 3 articles one is a writer, other are two companies. Yes I promise I will go through the article for creation process from now on. I have not got any compensation for this. Please reconsider. You can block me indefinitely if i create any more articles directly in the article space. I wont repeat my mistakes. (Goodpeoplework (talk) 11:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Global Media Insight

Hello, Goodpeoplework. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Global Media Insight, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Global Media Insight

Hello, Goodpeoplework. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Global Media Insight".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:10, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daemaar Group

Hello, Goodpeoplework. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daemaar Group, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daemaar Group

Hello, Goodpeoplework. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Daemaar Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:17, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]