Jump to content

User talk:Goodnightmush/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5→Archive 7

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.


The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 4, Issue 45 24 November 2008 About the Signpost
From the editor: 200th issue 
ArbCom elections: Candidate profiles News and notes: Fundraiser, milestones 
Wikipedia in the news Dispatches: Featured article writers — the inside view 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Volume 4, Issue 46 1 December 2008 About the Signpost
ArbCom elections: Elections open Wikipedia in the news 
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System Features and admins 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Volume 5, Issue 1 3 January 2009 About the Signpost
From the editor: Getting back on track 
ArbCom elections: 10 arbitrators appointed Virgin Killer page blocked, unblocked in UK 
Editing statistics show decline in participation Wikipedia drug coverage compared to Medscape, found wanting 
News and notes: Fundraising success and other developments Dispatches: Featured list writers 
Wikipedia in the news WikiProject Report: WikiProject Ice Hockey 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

California Musical Theatre edit war

Two editors on California Musical Theatre refuse to edit in good faith and one is becoming harassing.

The consensus (so far the only other two are myself and DionysosProteus)is that the spelling for theatre on the article should be theatRE. However User:Bhuck refuse to stop making reverts to his decided spelling. On the article Proposition 8 the member left a hidden message next to the text for California Musical Theatre; !--sic -- in California they are using the non-US spelling for the proper noun--.

Also User:DionysosProteus refuses to stop adding information in the lead that goes against consensus and editing in good faith. Even after I added the exact wording to the "History" section as a compromise. He continues to accuse me falsely of vandalism.

It is clearly an edit war. I know placing "Protection" on an article is a last ditch effort and is not something you do lightly.....but this may just need it now.--

This is clearly attempts by both members to push an agenda and their own POV. Amadscientist (talk) 00:53, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Roman forum

Crap! If you get a sec could you also take a look at the Roman forum article. It appears to be under attack be random vandals.....I mean REAL vandals. Constant reverts seem to be going on now for just over a month.--Amadscientist (talk) 01:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

I have made formal requests

Sorry for taking up space on your talk page for these situations. I discovered the proper page to request protection. I've never had to actualy request a page be protected so I didn't know thare was a place for that, but thanks!--Amadscientist (talk) 03:34, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

I need a favor

If you have time and could look into this situation with the California Musical Theatre article and then get back to me with what you percieve was the actual problem. I have been spoken to in ways that would blow your hair back in other discussion previuose to this, and yet when I simply ask someone not to be an ass that is held against me as incivil when I am being accused of being a vandal.

I have not been blocked but have been told i did make 4 reverts. 3 on the 11th of January and one that they say is the fourth revert on the 9th of January. No explanation has been made other than to say that was the fourth revert. I do not undertand this at all. I am not asking for you to step in just view the discussion page, the edits and reverts and the 3rr violation complaint and if you undertand what is going on......could you explain it to me?

There was no discussion at all about my being accused of vandalism, there was an actual accusation that there was no consensus for me to revert to begin with when the Wikipedia policy states silence is consensus and I was not silent. So there was no consensus for Dionysis to make his change. Wiki policy also states that continuing to place information back over and over again without consensus is vandalism which is what Dionysis was doing along with calling me a vandal over and over.

Even if you agree with the others I am hoping you will at least take the time to leave me a message on my talk page....which I have blanked along with my User page. My not understanding doesn't make me right, but it does cause me a great deal of stress and makes me percieve a manipulation of the system against the wikipedia policy.--Amadscientist (talk) 07:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 2 10 January 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: December themed Main Page Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 19:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 3 17 January 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes: New board members, changes at ArbCom Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: Featured article writers—the 2008 leaders WikiProject Report: WikiProject Pharmacology 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:37, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 4 24 January 2009 About the Signpost
Jimbo requests that developers turn on Flagged Revisions Report on accessing Wikipedia via mobile devices 
News and notes: New chapters, new jobs, new knight and more Wikipedia in the news: Britannica, Kennedy, Byrd not dead yet 
Dispatches: Reviewing featured picture candidates Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Delivered at 04:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC) by §hepBot (Disable)

Wikipedia Signpost, January 31, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 5 31 January 2009 About the Signpost
Large portion of articles are orphans News and notes: Ogg support, Wikipedia Loves Art, Jimbo honored 
Wikipedia in the news: Flagged Revisions, Internet Explorer add-on Dispatches: In the news 
WikiProject Report: Motto of the Day Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 21:30, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost, February 8, 2009

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 5, Issue 6 8 February 2009 About the Signpost
News and notes: Elections, licensing update, and more Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's future, WikiDashboard, and "wiki-snobs" 
Dispatches: April Fools 2009 mainpage WikiProject Report: WikiProject Music 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:00, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 16, 2009

The Signpost
Volume 5, Issue 7
Weekly Delivery
2009-02-16

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist.
If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 06:44, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

First Edit Day

Happy First Edit Day, Goodnightmush/Archive 3, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Versus22 talk 07:13, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — February 23, 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 8, which includes these articles:

The kinks are still being worked out in a new design for these Signpost deliveries, and we apologize for the plain format for this week.

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 01:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 2 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 08:11, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost — 9 March 2009

This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 23:32, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


The Wikipedia Signpost  — 16 March 2009

Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) at 22:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 23 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 30 March 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 20:03, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

MSNBC

Hey. I'm telling many different people that I need help in cleaning up my article: History of MSNBC: 2008-Present. Thanks.--Mapple001 (talk) 19:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 6 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:05, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 13 April 2009

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 16:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 20 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:32, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

The Wikipedia SignpostWikipedia Signpost: 27 April 2009

Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:15, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Battle of Camp Hill

Battle of Camp Hill. I think you need to be a little more careful when using AWB (I know when I use it there and I am fixing many pages I make similar errors). Which makes more sense? "All physical traces of Camp Hill fight have passed away. The ground has been all built over, and the site of the Birmingham earthworks is covered by streets." or "All physical traces of Camp Hill fight have died. The ground has been all built over, and the site of the Birmingham earthworks is covered by streets."[1] --PBS (talk) 14:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert

Thanks for the quick revert on my talk page :) I always appreciate it. Jamesofur (talk) 20:54, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Thankyou and apologies

Thank you for reverting my edit on the article Computer-generated imagery; It was an embarrassing mishap of me editing what I thought was my own User copy of the page, but was in fact the actual page; Rpgsimmaster (talk) 22:11, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

My talk page

Hi, I saw you reverted some stuff on my talk page. I have no idea why this person is removing everything and why I'm the only page they're even doing it to. Very odd indeed. Thanks though. DX927 (talk) 02:48, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Goodnightmush/Archive_3&oldid=1242735756"