User talk:Gmforrest

Welcome!

Hello, Gmforrest, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like National Peoples Action, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Acroterion _(talk) 04:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of National Peoples Action

A tag has been placed on National Peoples Action requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Acroterion _(talk) 04:52, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

National People's Action

I see the article was already deleted once. I tagged your new version to highlight some problems it has. The principal issue is the lack of reliable third-party sources that can help establish the notability of this organization. Wikipedia is generally very inclusive when it comes to these types of subjects, but if you do not add references that help establish notability, it will probably be deleted. See WP:FIRST for a general guide on how to write articles and WP:CORP for information about what constitutes notability for organizations. And don't hesitate to ask for help if you need it. §FreeRangeFrog 05:21, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I came by because the addition you made to Community Reinvestment Act was unsourced. I did a search for: "Gale Cincotta" Community Reinvestment Act and found and added a source, but came by to tell you that if you add unsourced statements to articles, they're likely to be reverted. So it's better to do a google search for a source before adding anything.

I see that you are having trouble with your new article. After doing a bit of googling, it seems obvious that the group is notable and should have an article. But, you have to cite sources, otherwise it'll be deleted again. To help you out, here are the results from a google search on news articles for the group's name "National People's Action". Drop me a message if you need help on how to do google searches. Also drop me a message if the article is the subject of an WP:AFD again.

LK (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree; NPA is a notable network of community organizations and has long been in need of a credible article, particularly in the light of the recent burst of interest in community organizers. It does need the kind of work specified above, and more. Please allow us some time to get it shaped up. Dwalls (talk) 08:31, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - Thanks for the suggestions and help. I'm very new to this (as you can tell) and will be sure to adhere to Wiki guidelines as I move forward.Gmforrest (talk) 22:02, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]