User talk:Globalr

Soviet Union-Tonga relations

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Soviet Union-Tonga relations, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Soviet Union–Tonga relations. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:05, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of Diplomatic missions in Sudan

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of List of Diplomatic missions in Sudan, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of diplomatic missions in Sudan. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About the pages listed above...

I've redirected the Sudan one to the original page, and someone else redirected the other one. --Alinnisawest,^{Dalek Empress} (extermination requests here) 18:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Romania–Palestine relations

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Romania–Palestine relations, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Romania-Palestine relations. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan-United Kingdom relations

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Pakistan-United Kingdom relations, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Pakistan–United Kingdom relations. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:48, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Fences and windows (talk) 22:40, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Pakistani diaspora

Please do not duplicate pages with a new title. If you would like to learn more about moving pages, please see the guidelines on this subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Fences and windows (talk) 22:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Foreign relations of Peru

I am sure this was not vandalism, but is there any particular reason why you hacked Kosovo out of the list? The content seems well-sourced. Aymatth2 (talk) 02:30, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Kosovan–Serbian relations has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 00:42, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want a redirect,[1] discuss it on the talk page. Fences and windows (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Or start a Request for Comment. Fences and windows (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Multinational Force - Iraq. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. I understand that there are reliable sources on both sides of the issue. I am not making a decision on this, but I'm quite sure that this is an edit war over the reliability of sources, and not blatant vandalism. Therefore, WP:EW applies. I suggest you pursue dispute resolution, starting with a discussion on the article talk page. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 19:28, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]