User talk:Gj2020

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 3 sections are present.

Maharana Bhupal Government Hospital moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Maharana Bhupal Government Hospital. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 22:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for the feedback. I will try to find more reliable sources for this article and make it sound more natural. Also, can you help me find any policy that explains what type of content is considered promotional or advertising? Gj2020 (talk) 21:06, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NOTPROMO and MOS:PUFFERY, which should hopefully give some idea of what is not allowed. The phrase "With a dedicated team of doctors, nurses, and support staff, MB Hospital continues its legacy of providing high-quality healthcare, upholding its mission to serve the people of Rajasthan with compassion and excellence." is one example of a promotional phrase filled with puffery. Do you have a connection to this hospital? Helpful Raccoon (talk) 21:15, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Again thank you for the help. I'll read both policies and will try to write it again if I find any more reliable source, otherwise I think I'll put it on hold for now. And not I don't have any connection with it as it's government hospital, Just wanted to write about it cause it's Udaipur's Biggest Goverment hospital that's all. Gj2020 (talk) 21:27, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Gj2020, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 19:08, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Study Table (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Potentially suitable for Wictionary, this is a WP:DICDEF

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Study Table and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gj2020! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:47, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: WoodenStreet has been accepted

WoodenStreet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:07, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maharana Bhupal Government Hospital (November 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Maharana Bhupal Government Hospital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 16:05, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for letting me know. Gj2020 (talk) 19:03, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste and related articles

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ekdalian (talk) 08:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]