User talk:Gikü

RE

NPC :) Mario1987 08:58, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Feel free to join WP:MDL. New people from Moldova in the English WP are worth their weight in gold. :) Dc76\^talk 02:52, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

lol jk

Gikü (talk) 14:44, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 04:13, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

From Wikimania 2016. Best wishes. --Muzammil (talk) 11:30, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Roger that. Regards, --Gikü (talk) 12:08, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding a collaboration of Romanian and Urdu Wikipedias - I hope you remember our discussion. --Muzammil (talk) 09:56, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muzammil, of course I remember. I have to conclude some current projects first and then in august-september we'll set up a collaboration. Sincerely, Gikü (talk) 10:13, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Gikü on Vladimir Plahotniuc. Wikilaj (talk) 19:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Buna Gikü, mulţumesc de suport. La fiecare editare am scris explicatia, adecvata, conform politicilor Wikipedia. Mai devreme tu ai sters din articol cateva afirmatii, argumentând că sunt bazate pe referinte ce apartin subiectului. În acest caz toate afirmatiile inserate in acest articol care directioneaza spre jurnal.md, si jurnaltv.md vor fi sterse. Deoarece aceasta presa apartine oponetului său, Victor Topa si este una menita doar sa atace imaginea subiectului, sa dezinformeze, sa manipuleze opinia publica, cu privirte la acest subiect. Am obosit sa explic si sa aduc argumente la acest lucru. Wikipedia nu-mi apartine mie nici tie, nici celor mai avansati administratori. Politicile Wikipedia le cunosc la fel si regulamentul. Dacă doriţi să editaţi, editaţi neutru. Oare e atit de important pentru voi ca la fiecare frază să folositi cuvinte denigratoare si sa transformati informatia in defavoarea subiectului? Ce facem din Wikipedia o platforma de adunat bârfe? De exemplu aceasta fraza "Despite the fact he holds no governmental position, Plahotniuc is known for his control over the Government, judiciary branch, prosecution system and the anti-corruption bodies through the Democratic Party, "vassal-parties" and particular persons in the top of management of Moldovan institutions" a fost spusa mai sus cu alte cuvinte "Also, Plahotniuc was accused for traffic of influence over all Moldovan political class." Eu consider ca ea este irelevantă in acest context, şi nu este suficient de sustinuta cu surse externe. Mulţumesc! Wikilaj (talk) 21:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikilaj: I'm OK with re-inserting the paragraph I deleted on 770527331, with the condition that it is stated the statement is made by his own media. It will be fair, look:

"According to Publika TV, a TV channel owned by Plahotniuc, most of the controversies regarding Vlad Plahotniuc has been launched by controversial political figures, such as Sergiu Mocanu or Andrei Năstase"
some political analysts stated at an opposition channel Jurnal TV, that these events are part of a hybrid war

--Gikü (talk) 16:01, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Articles of Wiki Academy Albania 2017 has been nominated for discussion

Category:Articles of Wiki Academy Albania 2017, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:44, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Plahotniuc 2019

Hello, Giku! I am adding subtitles to the Plahotniuc article because the Controversy section is long and unwieldy. It looks to me like you know more about the rules than us Brits do, so if I am violating any rules, please let me know. I want to be sensitive to all involved and also present a balanced set of information. Thank you, AlbertPenfold —Preceding undated comment added 12:16, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ACDS Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ad Orientem (talk) 03:33, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with the Vladimir Plahotniuc article reported at WP:ANI

See the ANI discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User AlbertPenfold. You have edited Plahotniuc's article in the past, so you might want to comment. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:17, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

6th Millionth Article

The community has determined that you were a runner-up to the 6th million article, having created Lidia Kulikovski in the same minute as the 6th millionth. Congratulations, and thank you for your work here! CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 22:05, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CaptainEek: My pleasure! Gikü (talk) 22:28, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good article. I remember with pleasure my own visit to the public library in the early 2000s.--Ipigott (talk) 10:41, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: That particular one (Hasdeu Municipal Library)? Gikü (talk) 10:52, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in connection with the 125th anniversary. I also coordinated Pulman and Calimera which you mention in the article. If you intend to create more biographies of women, you might find it useful to join wp:Women in Red.--Ipigott (talk) 11:12, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ipigott: Woah, that's neat! This library helped me out a number of times when I needed a free-of-charge venue for Wikipedia-related workshops, awarding ceremonies, and informal meetings. Mariana Harjevschi, who became head of the library after Kulikovski's retirement, was very open and helpful in hosting the first #1lib1ref in Moldova, back in 2018.

In what regards Women in Red, I feel like I am already part of the project, albeit not formally a member. On behalf of Wikimedians of Romania and Moldova User Group, I did a couple of workshops in Chișinău (along the lines of "women, for women, about women"), as well as online projects like 16 African Women. I will continue this kind of projects, and simply writing women's biographies, depending on time available. Bonne chance! Gikü (talk) 11:51, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

Hi Gikü,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck

HI Gikü,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, domnule Giku !

Mikechirco este un vandal recidivist și contribuțiile lui nu au ce căuta aici. Bravo, domnule Giku ! Can t you do more than that? Am creat numeroase pagini utile, despre personaje necunoscute, dar importante, in ciuda obstacolelor pe care dvs si Dan Mihai Pitea mi le tot stergeti. Cu adminii de pe Wikipedia in engleza ma inteleg foarte bine. Totusi, vad ca cu dvs si cu domnul Pitea nu se poate discuta. Stergeti pagini scrise corect gramatical, dar nu sunteti in stare sa eliminati adevaratele vandalisme (de exemplu, pe pagina scriitorului Ion Hadarca a scris mult timp ca e hot si ca traieste in Cuba. Eu eram blocat, dar am reusit cumva sa sesisez aceasta eroare, si a fost stearsa). Daca modificarile pe care le-am adus paginii ro:Constantin Condrea nu sunt bune, de ce nu aduceti dumneavoastra altele? Nu conteaza cine face modificarile, ci ce modificari sunt facute. M-ati mai blocat pentru ca spuneti ca nu stiu sa formatez o pagina. Dar, pana sa editez eu, pagina ro:Victor Gomoiu era plina cu link-uri care duceau la site-uri care o promovau pe Gabriela Firea, ca ce mult a muncit ea la spitalul Gomoiu. Nu v-ati deranjat sa le editati pe alea, dar sa ma blocati pe mine v-ati deranjat. Vandalul ce sunt. Tot incerc sa fac pagini despre persoane necunoscute din istoria noastra. De la militari, politicieni la preoti si artisti. Pagini care deja exista in alte limbi, dar nu in romana. Le traduc, dar nu motamo. Ca nu-s robot. Cat despre pozele cu scriitori sterse, ele sunt folosite si pe Wikipedia in rusa. Deoarecce persoanele despre care scriu nu prea sunt prezente pe internetul romanofon, m-am gandit ca ar fi fost interesant sa aduc si niste poze, tot de la surse din limba rusa. Vandalul ce sunt. Vandal recidivist, ati spus-o chiar dvs. Presimt ca dupa acest comentariu o sa-mi iau ban permanent, dar aia e, risc. Sau poate va deschideti ochii si va dati seama cine sunt adevaratii vandali.

Cu stima si respect, Mike Chirco aka Ramses

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikechirco (talk • contribs) 11:23, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You won

Felicitari dle Giku, ati invins. Nu o sa mai editez pe Wikipedia in Romana. Wikipedia in romana va ramane saraca in informatii, datorita dvs si dlui Pitea. Felicitari pentru aceasta victorie. I hope that you are proud of yourself — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikechirco (talk • contribs) 18:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sleep?

Domnule admin, dormiti? Pagina USR e vandalizata de 2 zile si nu o modifica nimeni. Eu daca fac o modificare in 5 minute deja mă blocați. https://ro.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniunea_Salva%C8%9Bi_Rom%C3%A2nia RAMSES$44932 (talk) 18:56, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Călin Georgescu

Hi, thanks for your message to me. I left a reason for my removal in my edit summary, which was that the content at the time of my revision was clearly biased and problematic in the context of the election. I appreciate that you have restored the paragraph with the problematic language removed. I may have rushed to get the problematic content down, when I should have just amended it, apologies.

I separately requested the article be protected on account of some of the problematic edits the page has received recently, which I think presents a risk of Wikipedia providing misinformation during an active election. StudyBeer (talk) 13:03, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]