User talk:Ghostieguide

User talk:Ghostieguide/Archive 1 Archive 1 June 2005- Jan 2007

Any comments add them here. I will usually respond here on this page Ghostieguide 02:43, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user is a participant in
WikiProject Western Australia.

Convict era of Western Australia

~~Convictism~~ Convict era of Western Australia shaped up really nicely. Your push not only gained a G/A but was probably the first success for the new WP:WA. Looking forward to your next suggestion when you return. Unless you want to go for F/A?!? Regards Fred 11:24, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I cant take any credit for that one, I hardly had any input. Mostly the stirling work of Hesp. I would however love to see Fremantle prison or the roundhouse at FA status but its a lot of work, Freo article itself could be bought to GA status, its suprisingly poor considering its importance. Keep up the good work. Ghostieguide 12:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dyk: English born colonials distinguished themselves from 'native-born' with the terms Sterling and Currency. Dr brewer will an interesting source for true blue if phrases interest you.

I just read Hotel wikipedia, then WP:Beast, very amusing. Fremantle article has so many editors past and present it needs a concerted effort. You may know my bias, but Freo is more notable and interesting than Perth and worth a push toward F/A. Fred 13:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Present Arms in Dub

Present Arms in Dub redirects to Present Arms In Dub. You've kinda lost me with your explanation... sorry. Which page should be redirecting to which? -- Longhair\^talk 23:29, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

~~Present Arms is also a duplicate page, requiring a merge (or redirect) as you say. -- Longhair\^talk 23:30, 22 January 2007 (UTC)~~[reply]

Perhaps not, similar titles though. -- Longhair\^talk 23:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Present Arms in Dub is currently a redirect. I think you've still got your cache problem going on. Try adding ?action=purge (which will clear the cache) to the end of the URL for Present Arms in Dub and see if you see what I see; a redirect. -- Longhair\^talk 01:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List...

Hey you pointed me to an issue - I somehow have been disposed otherwsie - could you remind me the issue - sorry to be nuisance... SatuSuro 11:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Hey right in front of me - I have it. God what a mess there...SatuSuro 11:28, 28 January 2007 (UTC) Did my bit - If I had denied the haunted places in central java when I was doing fieldwork there - I might as well not have gone there at all! SatuSuro 12:19, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Palm Island ACOTF

Hi Ghostieguide, you seem to be interested in Australian history (well Western Australian History anyway :), but you did participate in the Torres Strait Islanders Collaboration, so I thought you might be interested in the Palm ACOTF which has gained a lot of momentum over the last week, or even if you would just like to leave your opinion here as to what needs to be done. Thanks, Wiki Townsvillia n 14:12, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Headsup

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Western Australia/WA Meetup#How about. Hesperian 04:26, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: List of haunted locations AFD

I added a comment supporting a keep. --The Argonaut 22:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There's a missionary for science unchecked at the article - there now... Satu Suro 02:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup

Good to meet up - plan to come down to freo in the next couple of weeks from the mountain tops up here in the hills - might try to meetup again - very interested in the walk tour thingy seeing that my business plan for the hills never got beyond square one... so hope to catchup again- cheers SatuSuro 08:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bertonex191300.jpg

From what I can tell, the previous image was licenced under Fair use, and the current image is freely licenced, being in the public domain. The old image has been deleted. There's a current push for more free images on Wikipedia, so I think we're stuck with what's currently there. -- Longhair\^talk 23:24, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost tour speedy delete

The speedy delete was for the previous version of the article. By all means, please feel free to start from scratch.

--Nealparr ^{(yell at me|for what i've done)} 00:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Inside Cover

Have you read Inside Cover today? Hesperian 01:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chuckle! —Moondyne 01:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nationl Hotel

I can think of various towns in australia where pubs burning down was a regular occasion - i think midland lost three that way... Satu Suro 23:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bushranger is now ACOTF

Hi. You voted for Bushranger, which has been selected as the new ACOTF. Please help to improve it if you can. You probably have some interesting material about any who were imprisoned in Fremantle. Thanks. --Scott Davis ^Talk 14:55, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comeback!

Please contact via email soon Satu Suro 14:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I am sure I owe you a round? Satu Suro 07:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Departing

Sorry to hear that you're leaving us. Bon-voyage and all that and if you get a chance, logon over there. —Moondyne 04:54, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a pleasure working with ya. You know, you're still allowed to contribute to WA article, even if you're not actually here. ;-) Hesperian 04:58, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sad to see you go, hope life treats you well! Was a pleasure to meet you at the first meetup as well. Orderinchaos 12:18, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Regarding edits to Salad Fingers

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Ghostieguide! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \burbandictionary\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 08:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly... this is the reason I give up on editing Wikipedia... it all just too hard. Ghostieguide 08:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If it's any consolation I reverted your version as soon as I saw this message. Welcome back... even if only for a minute. Hesperian 08:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jeffrey

I'm struggling to see an excuse to resurrect it, because I can't find a source. If you can show me a reliable third party source of any description, I'll undelete it for you.

Some cynical advice: most speedy deletion patrollers only look at an article for about two seconds before they decide whether or not to delete it. Probably the deleter saw the words "second banana", didn't know what it meant, and presumed the whole article was a joke. Therefore appearances are everything; if that page had been linked and categorised, it probably would have survived. Mention that he was born in Providence, Rhode Island (the only other encyclopaedic information I could find on him) and you're a little closer. Find out in what year he was born, and what awards he was won, and you're nearly there. And references. Ironically, even an {{unreferenced}} tag would help.

Watch this. Your version was:

[cut]

My version would be:

[cut]

See my point? Hesperian 11:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... wrong article... original text was: Mark Jeffrey b(1825-1903) was an English convict transported to Australia, He was known as "Big Mark" The grave digger on the Isle of the Dead Cemetery at Port Arthur, Tasmania. His autobiograpy provides an insight into convict life.

Mark Jeffrey

Ref www.wood-ditton.org.uk/markjeffrey.htm

1 accessed 29Janauary 2006

Mark Jeffrey, A Burglars Life, ISBN 0-9750123-0-4 Printing Authority of Tasmania

 This Australian biography article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

Retrieved from "http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Mark_Jeffrey"

Copied from google cache Ghostieguide 12:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well! Now you know what the problem was. Some utter fuckwit overwrote your article with an article on a non-notable traffic reporter, and it was deleted. The admin that deleted it really ought to have checked the article history before deleting, but I'm sure you'll find it in your heart to forgive him. I shall undelete immediately. Hesperian 12:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thematic interpretation

It wasn't deleted; it was overwritten with a redirect. And by a non-admin. Your version is still in the history here. What that means is you don't have to jump through hoops or beg permission to restore it. Work it up in your sandbox, and when you're ready, just overwrite the redirect. I'll put it on my watchlist. Shout out if you need a hand. Hesperian 13:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Thunderstruckposter.jpg

Hello Ghostieguide, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Thunderstruckposter.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Ghostieguide/Sandbox. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 01:25, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your Back?

Hey noticed you edited your user page does that mean the ghost is back Gnan garra 23:13, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hope so. Hesperian 01:40, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:PresentarmsCover..jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:PresentarmsCover..jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Presentarmsdub.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Presentarmsdub.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're not around much, I have sorted out both of the above, so they don't get deleted. You still need to provide your source (e.g. the URL you downloaded them from) else they could still get tagged {{no source}} and deleted. Hesperian 23:32, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:38, 11 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter

WikiProject Australia publishes a newsletter informing Australian Wikipedians of ongoing events and happenings within the community and the project. This month's newsletter has been published. If you wish to unsubscribe from these messages, or prefer to have the newsletter delivered in full to your talk page, see our subscription page. This notice delivered by BrownBot (talk), at 21:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Back

-D Hesperian 03:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Great welcome back, are you here here of over there here.? Gnan garra 03:42, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008

The December 2008 issue of the WikiProject Australia newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. This message was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 07:23, 17 December 2008 (UTC) [reply]

NowCommons: File:Rolls Royce Silverghost AX201 restore1.jpg

File:Rolls Royce Silverghost AX201 restore1.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Rolls Royce Silverghost AX201 restore1.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Rolls Royce Silverghost AX201 restore1.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:30, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rolls Royce Silverghost AX201 restore2.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Rolls Royce Silverghost AX201 restore2.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:31, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rolls Royce Silverghost AX201 restore3.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Rolls Royce Silverghost AX201 restore3.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 14:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA reassessment of Bon Scott

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Bon Scott/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:24, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

Wikipedia:WikiProject Australian Roads/RfC:Infobox Road proposal

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 05:49, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wild Goose

Your article from 2006 is mentioned and pictured at DYK on the front page in 12 minutes Victuallers (talk) 23:49, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:FremantlePrisonartwork4.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FremantlePrisonartwork4.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Evad37 [talk] 04:11, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Did you know nominations/James Walsh (convict)

Ghostieguide, I'm glad you've decided to give DYK a try. However, there are a number of issues you'll need to clear up with this nomination if you wish it to proceed.

First, the article is too short. DYK nominations need to have a minimum of 1500 prose characters, and as it stands now there are only 1176 prose characters.

Second, you have not provided a hook with your nomination. As I'm sure you've noticed on Wikipedia's main page, each entry for Did you know has an entry that starts with "... that", and goes on to mention something interesting about the article; there is a bold link to the article itself so people can learn more. When you created the nomination template, you neglected to add this interesting information. Note that the fact(s) must be found in the article, and each fact must be given an inline source citation in the article by the end of the sentence where it appears.

I have moved the nomination to the proper spot on the nominations page, under April 6 (the day the article was created, based on UTC time). Nominations should always be placed under a date, which ought to be in the Current nominations section if you have nominated the article on time. You will want to add a hook as soon as possible to prevent the nomination from being closed, since every nomination requires a hook.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me. Best of luck! BlueMoonset (talk) 21:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

Hello! Your submission of James Walsh (convict) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for James Walsh (convict)

On 1 May 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article James Walsh (convict), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that intricate artworks on an Australian prison cell wall that were discovered by accident almost a century later are thought to be the handiwork of convict James Walsh? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Walsh (convict). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, James Walsh (convict)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 14:37, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ghostieguide. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Fair Use in Australia campaign update

I'm writing you this followup message, as you took the time to vote in support of a Wikipedia banner campaign for the introduction of Fair Use in Australia.

After much planning and coordination with the WMF, Australian Digital Alliance, and Electronic Frontiers Australia, as of Monday the banner-campaign is active on English Wikipedia to a portion of logged-out readers in Australia (technical details). The banners direct people to this page on Meta: FairCopyrightOz. That page, alongside lots of information, further directs people towards the campaign website faircopyright.org.au where Australians are invited to write to their local MP to express support of Fair Use. If you are interested in supporting this campaign, please, send a letter yourself using the template letter provided at that link.

Furthermore, and with the support of the ADA & EFA, we have received fantastic media coverage - with article "Fair Use: Wikipedia targets Australians in bid to change the law" appearing on page 2 of the Sydney Morning Herald and page 10 of the Melbourne Age on Monday's edition. It was for a time the 3rd most read article the Fairfax website, and Fair Use was "trending" on Twitter in Australia. We are running the account @FairCopyrightOz on twitter, and we are tracking other press-mentions on the talkpage on Meta.

Today, day 2, we published a detailed post about the campaign on the Wikimedia Blog, ran an "Ask Me Anything" Q&A session on the Australia page in Reddit, and [by happy coincidence of timing] the article History of fair use proposals in Australia appeared on the en.wp mainpage as a Did You Know. [The creation of that "history of..." article was a specific request arising from in the community consultation in which you voted].

And, most importantly, in a little more than a day nearly 800 letters to MPs have been sent encouraging them to support the Productivity Commission's recommendation to adopt Fair Use in Australia. I urge you - please add your own message.

Sincerely, Witty lama 17:02, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ghostieguide. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Fremantleprisonmap.jpg

The file File:Fremantleprisonmap.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 15:09, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

very late notice

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/Perth/50 - apologies for late notice - hope you are able to make it or some time!! JarrahTree 04:49, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops.. So missed that! Todlers change priorities. Perhaps next year. Ghostieguide (talk) 13:58, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ghostieguide. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

south flank

wow no category or project tag or reference section (welcomeback,again...) trustyou are not inPerth in the comingweek (gonna be very hot) or if you are you havegood ac JarrahTree 12:43, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its been a very long time.. Im so rusty.. I created the page because couldn't believe it wasn't there!.. Figured someone would notice.. Im a little less time poor now.. (had kids) so perhaps I can dip my toe in the water a little once again. Good to see a few familiar faces. Ghostieguide (talk) 12:56, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not many - most have slunk away into the woodwork - very few left active - lotsa smoke and mirrors

the 20th Birthday of Wikipedia is in January - will keep you posted... JarrahTree 13:05, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

so you back in town/editing potential again? JarrahTree 01:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yep.. Hi. I think so. I have a little more time now the kids have grown a bit. I seem to be a little rusty, so im dippimg my toe in. I would like to cocentrate on the WA convict stuff. It seems a little all over the place at he moment. Ghostieguide (talk) 03:04, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good on you! There are quite a few neglected areas in oz history - good to have the aspiration! JarrahTree 11:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:01, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]