User talk:Gharouni/Archives/2021/October
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Gharouni. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
Technical news
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
Arbitration
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
Miscellaneous
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
Administrators' newsletter – October 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.
- Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.
Technical news
- DiscussionTools has superseded Enterprisey's reply-link script. Editors may switch using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features.
Arbitration
- A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
- Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
- The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.
Miscellaneous
- Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
- The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
AfC notification: Draft:Toomaj Salehi has a new comment
Your submission at Articles for creation: Toomaj Salehi (October 26)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Toomaj Salehi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Toomaj Salehi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Gharouni!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Bilorv (talk) 23:36, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
|
- @BilorvThanks for your warm message. However,
I believe this refusal is rather political. Not even based on wiki policies listed.I don't have questions to ask as I have enough experience in wikipedia. Thanks again for the offer. Your's sincerely, Gharouni Talk 00:27, 27 October 2021 (UTC)- This is a very strange assumption on your part. I have very little knowledge of Iranian politics, as you can likely tell from the topic areas I edit, but I certainly oppose their government's actions here. If you have sufficient experience on Wikipedia then you will know that we should first consider WP:BLP1E. We find it inapplicable (criterion #2, Salehi is not low-profile) and so WP:BIO1E is the policy we should next turn to, where we see that it would be more common to have an article on the incident of arrest than on a biography of Salehi. However, evaluating the topic under Wikipedia:Notability (events) we find that the incident has not received sustained coverage, at least not according to the sources in the article (all from a couple of weeks in September, none from October), and as such I did not recommend an article on the incident itself, instead declining the draft as not demonstrating notability. — Bilorv (talk) 00:38, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Bilorv Thanks for your comment. I apologise if I jumped into conclusion quickly. Regards, Gharouni Talk 01:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is a very strange assumption on your part. I have very little knowledge of Iranian politics, as you can likely tell from the topic areas I edit, but I certainly oppose their government's actions here. If you have sufficient experience on Wikipedia then you will know that we should first consider WP:BLP1E. We find it inapplicable (criterion #2, Salehi is not low-profile) and so WP:BIO1E is the policy we should next turn to, where we see that it would be more common to have an article on the incident of arrest than on a biography of Salehi. However, evaluating the topic under Wikipedia:Notability (events) we find that the incident has not received sustained coverage, at least not according to the sources in the article (all from a couple of weeks in September, none from October), and as such I did not recommend an article on the incident itself, instead declining the draft as not demonstrating notability. — Bilorv (talk) 00:38, 27 October 2021 (UTC)