User talk:George6VI

Welcome!

Hello, George6VI, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Deb (talk) 12:39, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Citation

I apologise. Feel free to add it back. The Ninja5 Empire (Talk) 06:51, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pretenders

I have created the article Head of the former Chinese imperial clan‎ for your material. The "line of successor" articles are a series focusing on living pretenders. That's not your article is about. No one else has expressed support for what you are doing, so you can't claim WP:CONSENSUS for these changes to longstanding practices. The other 50 articles on the template have the same issues. The obvious solution is a common format. Whiff of greatness (talk) 15:37, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not because a common problem do I need to neglect the truth and history. I don't remove the contents; I just made the original ones merged into a bigger ones. - George6VI (talk) 15:39, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article moving

Line of succession to the former Chinese throne is a long established article with numerous contributors. If you want to rename it, please open a discussion at WP:RM. If you want to delete it, open a discussion at WP:AFD. Decisions on Wikipedia are by consensus supported by reliable sources. Chinese Wiki and "the truth" do not qualify as reliable sources. Whiff of greatness (talk) 03:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see that despite my advice above, you have once again renamed this article.[1] Given the history, you had to know this would be a controversial move. It should therefore be done by RM. If you don't revert, I'll take this to ANI. Whiff of greatness (talk) 10:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, George6VI. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

French monarchs family tree (simple)

Hi,

On the French monarchs family tree (simple) page, you made the following edit about eight months ago:

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=French_monarchs_family_tree_(simple)&diff=787791645&oldid=787776637

There is a mistake in this edit. The father and grandfather of Henry IV of France are both shown as the same person, Charles, Duke of Vendome. This was his grandfather, it is correct, but the father of Henry IV was Antoine of Navarre. The information was correct before you changed the page. I do not know how to make the correction (it is very confusing), and I am afraid that I will make some bigger mess, therefore I request you to please make the change quickly.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.182.183.64 (talk) 07:13, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I do know the correct genealogy, but this must be a typo. - George6VI (talk) 08:43, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question

You asked who could fix a template problem that never gets fixed. Perhaps the people who would fix the problem are at WP:VPT.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:40, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. - George6VI (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, George6VI. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi George6VI! You created a thread called I need advice (suitable place) for editing a template at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adventure Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elle. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

I saw your question at the help desk about archiving Facebook pages. Please leave edit summaries with your edits. It helps others follow what you are trying to do, and also helps prevent vandalism. Happy editing. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 19:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adventure Time

I just wanted to again say "thanks!" for all the awesome work you've done to the AT page. I love the images.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 16:54, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced claims in BLPs

Hi George6VI, I deleted the content you added to Andrew Lee (entrepreneur) because it was unsourced speculation that violated Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people. Please keep in mind when editing such biographies that all contentious material must be supported by an inline reference to a reliable source. --Joshua Issac (talk) 12:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Joshua Issac: I don't think that is so-called "unsourced". In existing references, there are only sources about Andrew claiming himself to be a royalty, but there is no source to prove that he genealogical is one. If you ever read House of Jeonju Yi, notable Joseon/Korean royalties have a clear family relation, but there is no such person called Andrew Lee in the family tree. As his claim is already dubious, it is reasonable to note those, so I am adding it back. - George6VI (talk) 13:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If it is not unsourced, please add the source. WP:BLP specifically warns against what you are doing, which is using original research and synthesis to back up claims that are not actually supported by reliable sources. I have removed the claim again per WP:BLPREMOVE. I have started a discussion on the BLP noticeboard; please add any further comments to Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Andrew Lee (entrepreneur) to keep the discussion in one place. --Joshua Issac (talk) 16:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Wikisource history/漢書

Template:Wikisource history/漢書 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Did Q28 make a mess today? 04:44, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Crown Princess Gonghoe

Hello! Your submission of Crown Princess Gonghoe at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:08, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Crown Princess Gonghoe

On 31 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Crown Princess Gonghoe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that King Seonjo considered necromancy for Crown Princess Gonghoe's funeral because her remains were lost during the 1592 Japanese invasion of Korea? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Crown Princess Gonghoe. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Crown Princess Gonghoe), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Input on Using "Bang Chan" Throughout the Article

Hi,

I hope you're doing well. I'm currently involved in a discussion on the talk page of Bang Chan, under the topic "Weird comment about name," regarding the consistent use of "Bang Chan" throughout his article, rather than reverting to just "Bang" after the initial mention. While one editor prefers to use "Bang" for subsequent references, others are fine with keeping "Bang Chan" throughout the article, as is common in similar cases. I’ve noticed that there are other articles, such as Gong Yoo, Megan Thee Stallion, and Lee Know, where the two-word name is consistently used throughout without reverting to the surname. Additionally, according to MOS:BIOEXCEPT, we are allowed to use a two-word name if the person is widely known by it, or if they have clearly declared and consistently used this as their preferred style. In this case, an overwhelming majority of reliable sources also follow this format for "Bang Chan."

Since you have experience in similar projects, I believe your input would greatly help in reaching a consensus. If you have the time, can I ping you there, could you kindly share your opinion on this matter? Your perspective would be very valuable to the discussion.

Thank you so much for your time, and I look forward to hearing your thoughts!

Best regards, RDWolfgang (talk) 05:24, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:53, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]